Authenticate this Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001

[Ac2100]

.
Its me again..

So, I found this datejust I like as well, and I need your help again to authenticate this.

Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001.

IF this is authentic, which whats is the best deal? the 16013 or 16233 from 1991 (I have added a picture last in this thread)
It is my first Rolex watch, and I am a newbie in this field so I really appreciate your help.

The 16013 has the box with.

[Ac2100]

The first pic is 16013, the last 16233.

[GLADIATOR]

Movement genuine.
I would like others comments on the bracelet, that has some concerns if all original and/or correct end links and clasp
A

[crowncollection]

Originally Posted by Ac2100

.

Its me again..



So, I found this datejust I like as well, and I need your help again to authenticate this.



Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001.



IF this is authentic, which whats is the best deal? the 16013 or 16233 from 1991 (I have added a picture last in this thread)

It is my first Rolex watch, and I am a newbie in this field so I really appreciate your help.



The 16013 has the box with.

16013 ceased production 1987


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ac2100]

Thank you for your reply.

The seller just wrote me that the watch is from 1988, and not 2001- would that change anything or is there to many red flags?

[dera]

Yes definitely not 2001. Looks good, box not original to the watch (and impossible to say if it is real based on those pics).

[jvmartin]

original 16013... just make sure that's what actually arrives.

[freefly]

The hands on the 16013 look a bit off.
Near the center stack you can see what looks like either Like oil smudges or possibly generic plated hands where the plating has come off.

[Ac2100]

Originally Posted by Ac2100

.
Its me again..

So, I found this datejust I like as well, and I need your help again to authenticate this.

Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001.

IF this is authentic, which whats is the best deal? the 16013 or 16233 from 1991 (I have added a picture last in this thread)
It is my first Rolex watch, and I am a newbie in this field so I really appreciate your help.

The 16013 has the box with.

Okay, so you would say that this is an authentic Rolex 16013 Dera & Jvmartin?
But freefly, you would say it is a fake?

[freefly]

Originally Posted by Ac2100

Okay, so you would say that this is an authentic Rolex 16013 Dera & Jvmartin?
But freefly, you would say it is a fake?

Not "fake", just that there is an issue with the hands on the white-dial 16013. Could be generic plated hands.
Also, the bezel appears to be aftermarket. Not 100% on the dial either (would need to see a straight-on high-res pic).