ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 August 2016, 11:32 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
People looking down on Tudor and "starter rolex models"
I just want to say that I have seen a couple of comments with people looking down on Tudor and entry level rolex like "I would not wear a Tudor because it would be like I couldnt afford a Rolex". Along this same vein there have been comments about the explorer 1 and no date sub being something you only buy if you cannot afford a sub or date version.
I appreciate the Tudor brand and all Rolex models for different reasons ! I remember last year I had a sub, Daytona, and explorer 1 in my collection and many people told me to get rid of the explorer because it adds nothing, for example. I argued that it added a simple clean watch but many did not think it deserved a place? Well I guess the purpose of this post is that we should try to stay positive and embrace the diversity in peoples collections and the choices they make. Now here is a picture of my new favorite watch :). Stay positive :) Have a great evening, Josh |
5 August 2016, 11:38 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Agreed, although I guess I haven't really seen much in that regard in these forums. I think people stay pretty civil around here. FWIW, even though I don't own a Tudor, I currently like more watches in the Tudor lineup than in the Rolex lineup.
|
6 August 2016, 12:29 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,231
|
Quote:
That said, I don't understand why many popular watch forums push Rolex and Tudor together, you don't see Acura and Honda sharing the same posting space, it could naturally lead to arguments. I'm a hardcore Rolex loyalist, I never considered a Tudor and never would. I don't have anything against those that like the brand, but frankly over at WUS the Black Bay threads do get tiresome to weed through. |
|
5 August 2016, 11:42 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 223
|
I haven't seen any of that. The closest was in the "entry level Rolex" thread, but even then there wasn't much like that. I actually see a ton of support here and guys wearing Platonas congratulating someone on their first OP. Overall I think the Rolex forum is the nicest watch forum around (people wise)
|
12 August 2016, 07:41 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 12,000+ Lakes!
Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR
Posts: 840
|
Quote:
|
|
12 August 2016, 08:41 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: BLNR, CHNR
Posts: 94
|
Hello gents. You can call Tudor anything you like, but this beauty below, get me more compliments than my BLNR.
|
12 August 2016, 12:45 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
|
I wore my Heritage chrono Blue today (on the strap, my summer preference) and had two unsolicited comments. One was from an acquaintance who I never pegged as much of a watch guy, who has a well-worn acrylic crystal Sub date. The other was from a guy wearing an Omega Planet Ocean. The only comment I've ever received on my BLNR was from a guy who was also wearing one. Your pic kind of makes me want to put the oyster bracelet back on mine!
|
5 August 2016, 11:43 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 51
|
I have noticed that, in my honest opinion, if you are buying watches because how much they cost or for their 'status', you aren't a watch enthusiast. If you look down on any watch and judge someone for wearing it (unless it's a fake, bad homage, etc) you're are not welcome in the watch community. Every watch was built for a reason and carry's significant history (explorer 1 after the summit of sir edmund hillary, Tudor's past.., etc). BTW, i love the pelagos! I have a black bay black and im in love. Could I afford a Rolex sub instead? yes.. did i want this one more? yes :)
|
6 August 2016, 04:24 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Unseen Thailand
Watch: LN/LV/BLNR
Posts: 543
|
Quote:
|
|
6 August 2016, 04:48 AM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 1,070
|
Quote:
|
|
5 August 2016, 11:46 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116333
Posts: 415
|
Tudor is really good brand and Tudor watches are very nice. Especially if you need a "daily beater" or are involved in physical activities (e.g. I would not go for some trips to countryside where physical activities involved with PM or TT Rolex watch).
Yes, Explorer I can be considered as "entry level" Rolex, some people like it so not. Everything depends on subjective preferences. For example, I do not like Explorer I but Explorer II (polar) is exceptionally nice watch. Milgauss is a very unique Rolex and I guess you like it or hate it. I like it very much, but I like Daytona more :) So that's why my 2nd Rolex will be Daytona-C or TT Daytona. |
5 August 2016, 11:55 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Jay
Location: East and West
Posts: 1,894
|
Explorer 1, especially the newer update (and the vintage variants) is a darn good watch!
|
5 August 2016, 11:58 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
Let people say what they want. Being bothered by comments like that only prove them right. Wear in good health.
|
14 August 2016, 01:01 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
|
Yup. I honestly just don't understand why people care at all what anyone else thinks about their material purchases. Along the same lines, I find it baffling that there are so many "which one should I get" threads. Get what YOU want.
|
5 August 2016, 11:59 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
|
Maybe I don't read the threads completely enough but I don't recall anyone in here demeaning someone for buying a Tudor. That would seem very out of place for this forum... It amazes me in a good way how complimentary people are in here. How many days do 3 or 4 people post an incoming Sub? Every post is full of congrats and never a sarcastic comment about "how original" or some such thing. So cheers to us! finding that anywhere in life is rare, especially on an Internet forum.
|
6 August 2016, 01:21 AM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,771
|
Quote:
|
|
6 August 2016, 02:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
5 August 2016, 12:02 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,211
|
I haven't seen any of that here. Tudor is a great brand. My only issue is the non in house movement that many have but that's not exclusive to Tudor. Wear what you enjoy. Who cares what others think?
|
5 August 2016, 12:10 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Anuradha
Location: Sri Lanka
Watch: 16234,116613LN
Posts: 345
|
Think about cars - Mercs. Usually you get into Mercs through C or E class. Smaller, Cheaper and less complicated models. Nobody buys a S as the first car. So entry level Rolexes follow the same logic.
Tudors are another brand from my point of view. They have their own merits and downside also. My 2 cents worth. |
5 August 2016, 12:12 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Jackie Stewart DD
Posts: 5,661
|
Love Tudor
__________________
Rolex - Tudor - Omega - Breitling - Oris - Grand Seiko - Timex - Casio - Ocean Crawler - Ganymede - American Waltham - Seiko - Gruen - Arethusa - Citizen - Sinn - Nodus - Formex |
5 August 2016, 12:21 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
Some people buy up the model line of cars/watches because of status, and others buy what suits their needs. I'd personally take a Sub over a DayDate, regardless of cost. |
|
5 August 2016, 12:30 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
Just to be clear, the vast majority of posts here are supportive and positive, this is an excellent forum and a great community. I just meant this to be a little reminder that we should try to stay positive even tho sometimes we forget :)
|
5 August 2016, 12:40 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Kent
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 611
|
I read a lot of the posts here, and I haven't seen anything like what you are describing. Can you link to them?
__________________
"Bond reflected that good Americans were fine people and that most of them seemed to come from Texas." -Ian Fleming, Casino Royale Rolex Sea-Dweller 126600 | Omega Seamaster 300 MC | Breitling Navi 01 |
5 August 2016, 12:43 PM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
Quote:
Sent by my pet Gekko
__________________
Follow me on Instagram to see my watch journey @Japenney |
|
5 August 2016, 12:30 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
I just buy what I like and don't care what other people think.
|
5 August 2016, 02:17 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: D-Blue, GS SBGE001
Posts: 695
|
|
5 August 2016, 11:02 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Disneyland, Calif
Watch: 20th Moon, ND Sub.
Posts: 931
|
|
6 August 2016, 05:26 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jansky
Location: Midwest
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 610
|
|
5 August 2016, 03:03 PM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
|
|
5 August 2016, 11:03 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.