AD kinda scolded me!

[Lefty-P]

I called a local AD today to see if they sold leather or croc straps. She asked which watch I was going to use it for. I told her a Submariner. She proceeded to strongly advise me to never alter my Rolex in any way including the bracelet. And that they would not install the strap for me. I told her I just wanted to purchase the straps and install them myself. I currently use mostly Nato and rubber straps anyway. She went on and on about what a mistake I was making.
I then called another branch of the same AD and he said " Sure! Come on in and let me show you a few options. "



Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

[Old Expat Beast]

The first one was right. The second one just wants your money.

[The Libertine]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

The first one was right. The second one just wants your money.

[GFONG]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

The first one was right. The second one just wants your money.

This!

[Lordofrolex]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

The first one was right. The second one just wants your money.

Everest straps are a pretty well known thing in the rolex community as well as putting a vintage leather strap on a vintage sub. Personally don't think anything is wrong with this.

[Old Expat Beast]

Originally Posted by Lordofrolex

So you're against everest type straps? I mean its kind of wrong to get mad at someone for altering there watch. Its there watch they can do whatever they want with it. If they choose to void there warranty that should be there choice. And who doesn't want to put a nice vintage leather strap on a nice vintage sub.

I think everest straps for rolexes is such a common thing that its almost expected to have a everest strap for your sport model rolex for those beach days.

I have a pam and an AP and like to change up the straps on both. Don't think it diminishes anything about the watch.

I meant that the AD, a representative of Rolex, was right to stick to Rolex company policy.

[Hairdude1]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

I meant that the AD, a representative of Rolex, was right to stick to Rolex company policy.

agree

[Lordofrolex]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

I meant that the AD, a representative of Rolex, was right to stick to Rolex company policy.

Well yeah I understand what your saying in terms of keeping policy.

[LuminousMaximus]

I can see both sides here...

OK.

[Investr]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

The first one was right. The second one just wants your money.

X2!!! I despise NATO straps. They make the watches look cheap! Sorry...

[ming the merciless]

Originally Posted by Investr

X2!!! I despise NATO straps. They make the watches look cheap! Sorry...

Me too.

[DawgByte]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

The first one was right. The second one just wants your money.

Agree 100%!

[Punishher7]

The manager of the first ad may be interested to know the sakes tactics of their employees. That's poor salesmanship pure and simple.

[Mick P]

Originally Posted by Punishher7

The manager of the first ad may be interested to know the sakes tactics of their employees. That's poor salesmanship pure and simple.

It may well be poor salesmanship but the salesperson was making a decent effort to protect the image of the brand. I very much doubt if Rolex really want people slapping a croc strap on a Submariner. It is somewhat infadig.

Regards

Mick

[Punishher7]

Originally Posted by Mick P

It may well be poor salesmanship but the salesperson was making a decent effort to protect the image of the brand. I very much doubt if Rolex really want people slapping a croc strap on a Submariner. It is somewhat infadig.

Regards

Mick

He was wanting to put a rolex strap on a rolex watch. I really don't see the problem.

[Mick P]

Originally Posted by Punishher7

He was wanting to put a rolex strap on a rolex watch. I really don't see the problem.

If you can't see the problem then there is little more that can be said.

[Punishher7]

Originally Posted by Mick P

If you can't see the problem then there is little more that can be said.

It annoys me at times that Rolex acts like we are leasing these watches from them. I understand they want their stock original but if a guy wants to change the strap on a watch that he bought and paid for where's the problem?

With that said, I also understand that they are not obligated to nor should they honor warranty on a watch that has had the case opened outside of an RSC.

This is changing a bracelet for a strap... Too much kool-aid drinking if you ask me.

[Javier2.0t]

Originally Posted by Mick P

If you can't see the problem then there is little more that can be said.

I think you might have had too much of that Kool-Aid.

AD's are selling rubber Everest straps. why shouldn't I be able to put any strap I like on my couple of thousand dollar watch? To protect the brands identity?

[2th_doc]

Originally Posted by Mick P

It may well be poor salesmanship but the salesperson was making a decent effort to protect the image of the brand. I very much doubt if Rolex really want people slapping a croc strap on a Submariner. It is somewhat infadig.



Regards



Mick

Good point. I didn't look at it from that perspective.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Jack Bauer]

Originally Posted by Mick P

It may well be poor salesmanship but the salesperson was making a decent effort to protect the image of the brand. I very much doubt if Rolex really want people slapping a croc strap on a Submariner. It is somewhat infadig.

Regards

Mick

Yeah I don't see how a croc strap on a Sub doesn't cheapen the watch a little bit. Also reckon if I were going to defile a watch I'd pick a Michael Kors or one with less value. But it's all relative I'm sure to how significant your watch is to you.

That being said, gimmie a pair of genuine croc shoes or wallet any day of the week.

[2th_doc]

I don't think the 1st sales associate was very knowledgeable. I dont think changing a strap is altering your rolex in a sense that your warranty is voided. Simply put your original bracelet back on. Now if you have diamonds set in your oyster or let Bamford get a hold of your watch thats different.
The 2nd sales associate knew exactly what your intentions were and therefore was more helpful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Punishher7]

Originally Posted by 2th_doc

I don't think the 1st sales associate was very knowledgeable. I dont think changing a strap is altering your rolex in a sense that your warranty is voided. Simply put your original bracelet back on. Now if you have diamonds set in your oyster or let Bamford get a hold of your watch thats different.
The 2nd sales associate knew exactly what your intentions were and therefore was more helpful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree.

[Snow-Dweller]

I disagree with some of the comments above. It's your watch, and you can do whatever you like with it.

[hbk25]

Yeah I got a dirty look and snicker from a salesperson at an AD asking me, "What did you do to your milgauss?" when she saw this NATO. Rubbed me the wrong way.

Then another time, different AD, they politely explained the "keep it oem" policy, and that regrettably they would not be able to make the swap, but sure, "take a look at our different straps that would fit."

And of course at "my" AD, they showed me some recommendations, sold, then swapped out the bracelet for me. No questions asked.

[japenney]

Its your watch wear whatever strap you like on it. However I understand an AD refusing to do the change as I get the "upholding the brand image" argument. There are many ADs these days losing their official status for sillier reasons from what I have heard.

[Punishher7]

Originally Posted by japenney

Its your watch wear whatever strap you like on it. However I understand an AD refusing to do the change as I get the "upholding the brand image" argument. There are many ADs these days losing their official status for sillier reasons from what I have heard.

The ad not doing the work makes sence, but refusing to sell a strap does not.

[Maxy]

Originally Posted by hbk25

Yeah I got a dirty look and snicker from a salesperson at an AD asking me, "What did you do to your milgauss?" when she saw this NATO. Rubbed me the wrong way.

Really.. "What did you do to your milgauss?"

[pigman08]

Originally Posted by hbk25

Yeah I got a dirty look and snicker from a salesperson at an AD asking me, "What did you do to your milgauss?" when she saw this NATO. Rubbed me the wrong way.

Then another time, different AD, they politely explained the "keep it oem" policy, and that regrettably they would not be able to make the swap, but sure, "take a look at our different straps that would fit."

And of course at "my" AD, they showed me some recommendations, sold, then swapped out the bracelet for me. No questions asked.

Proper answer to that question: "Whatever the hell I want... It is MY Milgauss"

[Dr. Prunesquallor]

Originally Posted by hbk25

Yeah I got a dirty look and snicker from a salesperson at an AD asking me, "What did you do to your milgauss?" when she saw this NATO. Rubbed me the wrong way.

Then another time, different AD, they politely explained the "keep it oem" policy, and that regrettably they would not be able to make the swap, but sure, "take a look at our different straps that would fit."

And of course at "my" AD, they showed me some recommendations, sold, then swapped out the bracelet for me. No questions asked.

I'm a big believer in "to each their own", but IMHO the high polish of the Milgauss case and the strap are a bit at odds.

[hbk25]

Originally Posted by Dr. Prunesquallor

I'm a big believer in "to each their own", but IMHO the high polish of the Milgauss case and the strap are a bit at odds.

I'm kind of conflicted with this watch. The bracelet is perfect in terms of comfort (more so than the exp ii/oyster lock, which is either too tight, too loose, too something). But I can't seem to enjoy it due to the pcl's.

So yeah I'm experimenting. Nice thing is, watches are bought & paid for, so no one can stop me from this strap madness!