ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 August 2016, 11:16 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Nico Shittass
Location: Niger
Watch: Still looking
Posts: 3
|
Why would Rolex File off the serial number
I have a Rolex Sea Dweller 4000 for the past forty years. It is (was) in perfect condition until it went to Rolex South Africa for a service.
Today I took it in to have valued for insurance and then I was asked what happened to it, it is not authentic.... WHAT? Yes, Rolex filed off the numbers on the side of the watch! Heaven knows why. They also replaced the back with one that has no markings at all. Is this what Rolex has become? The serial number was 8358076 purchased on 11/02/1986. I have totally lost all respect for Rolex and would never even mention its name again as well as refrain from wearing this piece of junk. |
19 August 2016, 11:25 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Umm. You took it to a Rolex service center? Don't think they'd do that.
What did they say when you asked about these issues? |
19 August 2016, 11:29 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,225
|
If my calculations are correct, you've had it for 30 years and not 40. The pictures aren't very clear but in any case you should contact the Rolex service centre in the first instance about your experience.
__________________
There's no such thing as a Submariner No Date, it's simply Submariner. You don't call a Porsche 911 Turbo, a Porsche 911 Turbo No S. www.instagram.com/sutatshorology Post Your Rolex/Tudor Watch Weight (PYRTWW) |
19 August 2016, 11:33 PM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,314
|
Where did you buy the watch from?
|
19 August 2016, 11:36 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: Bucks, UK
Posts: 1,096
|
Looks like the end links have worn the S/N. quite common.
Was it Rolex who told you it was not authentic or some jeweller? Looks like you've still got the original case back. |
19 August 2016, 11:36 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
|
Something doesn't add up here...
|
20 August 2016, 03:17 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Watch: 126610LV and SMP
Posts: 1,645
|
|
19 August 2016, 11:48 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
19 August 2016, 11:54 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 13
|
The serial number on that part of the case isn't deeply engraved, and the bracelet can wear it off. You can still make out part of the serial number from the photos (076).
They haven't purposely got rid of it during a service. |
19 August 2016, 11:55 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
|
Did you get to keep the original case back?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
19 August 2016, 11:58 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Someone
Location: Somwhere
Watch: Tudor LHD
Posts: 1,001
|
I do t think Rolex would file a serial number. I owned a 5513 and the number was hard to read and looked a lot like yours why I don't know but with a loupe the number was found. Good luck and I hope this all get resolved for you.
|
20 August 2016, 12:09 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Post the service paper pls.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
20 August 2016, 12:31 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Watch: 16622,BLNR,116500
Posts: 1,009
|
"There's a flaw in the slaw" R. Coltrane
|
20 August 2016, 12:32 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I can see the ending 076 on the case. Can't see the rest because of the glare of the flash.
Your installed case back doesn't seem to be a SD case back. It should have writing on it. Need better pics, service papers, etc
__________________
member#3242 |
20 August 2016, 12:36 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Helloooooo!
|
20 August 2016, 01:42 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 300
|
I nearly had heart attack once when I took off the bracelet of a 2006 Submariner that wasn't cleaned in a while and couldn't see the serial number, a quick bath and a brush did the trick.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk |
20 August 2016, 01:45 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 300
|
The only problem I see here is that they fitted the wing case back, I wouldn't mind too much as it looks like they gave back the old one, it's just a matter of going back to the RSC and telling them to put on the correct case back. Other than that everything looks ok.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk |
20 August 2016, 02:37 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 252
|
I'm not commenting either way on the OP's specific situation but a couple of years ago Jaeger Le Coultre polished everything off the back of my Reverso when it was in for a service. The watch didn't even need that much of a polish, it only had a few surface hairline marks, and the back didn't even need to be polished. Serial number, reference, water resistance etc all completely gone.
The Swiss manufacture also over polished a treasured vintage watch with an inscription to my grandfather nearly removing it and didn't do the work I specifically sent it back to Switzerland for. I got a telephone call from the US CEO at the time to apologize and they re-engraved the Reverso but that was it. The engraving looked like an after market addition. I lost all respect for and confidence in that brand after that. All I am saying is does happen, even at the upper levels of watchmaking. |
20 August 2016, 02:51 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Unknown
Posts: 289
|
My watch is only a year old and the model number under the end link is starting to wear.
Did you check the serial number before sending it in? My guess is that the end link wore it off over time. |
20 August 2016, 03:13 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
|
20 August 2016, 03:11 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
As others have said, you can still clearly see the word "steel" and 076 in that horrendous picture.
I'm sure the rest of the numbers are there. Just much shallower. So they obviously didn't file the number off. More likely the bracelet has made it harder to read over that amount of time.
__________________
Rolex Datejust 41 126334 | Omega Speedmaster Professional Hesalite | Cartier Santos Large | Tudor Black Bay 58 |
20 August 2016, 03:20 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
Where exactly was the service done?
That's endlink rub/wear, its NORMAL. To the OP, why do you think ROLEX filed off your serial number and not the bracelet end link rubbing/wearing it off over 30 years? The answer is probably somewhere along the lines of why 1986 to now is 40 years. Not sure why a submariner caseback was put on, I have my skepticism that this was done at RSC. |
20 August 2016, 03:34 AM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,019
|
Some 'splainin' to do methinks.
The photo's don't back up the narrative. An RSC would not do anything described by the OP...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
20 August 2016, 03:45 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Um. Hard to believe that was worked on by RSC.
|
20 August 2016, 03:49 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
I think that the OP is full of it.
|
20 August 2016, 05:31 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
|
20 August 2016, 08:44 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,067
|
There's a lot that's off.
Right off |
20 August 2016, 04:03 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Unknown
Posts: 289
|
By his standards I'm 40.
That doesn't sit well with me... |
20 August 2016, 04:05 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
|
20 August 2016, 05:22 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Unknown
Posts: 289
|
|
Tags |
calm down , vintage |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.