ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

BNA/LION · 12 October 2016, 03:55 AM

Good looking machine, minus the rear wing affixed to the trunk lid. IMHO

See Article here:
http://mbworld.org/articles/spied-me...mpaign=content

Tri-Tip · 12 October 2016, 03:56 AM

Lose the wing, make the trunk lid match the rest of the car, price it under $100K, and it's a winner!

kilyung · 12 October 2016, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tri-Tip

Lose the wing, make the trunk lid match the rest of the car, price it under $100K, and it's a winner!

I thought it was supposed to be priced around $70k?

GoingPlaces · 12 October 2016, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

I thought it was supposed to be priced around $70k?

C63S Coupe can be had for around 90K loaded. That's plenty of car.

returntorolex · 12 October 2016, 09:29 AM

Didn't see the Nurburgring lap time....under 7:45?

rr-nyc · 12 October 2016, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by returntorolex

Didn't see the Nurburgring lap time....under 7:45?

There haven't been timed laps at the ring for a while now

texex91 · 12 October 2016, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoingPlaces

C63S Coupe can be had for around 90K loaded. That's plenty of car.

And sold for $60k

1st amg · 12 October 2016, 10:03 AM

I have seen the C63S coupe in the flesh, and it is stunning. The lines actually resemble the S coupe. It looks classy and aggressive all at the same time. The previous generation C63 coupe were horrendous. The C63S coupe is a home run. This R coupe looks a little off with that massive wing.

Etschell · 13 October 2016, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tri-Tip

Lose the wing, make the trunk lid match the rest of the car, price it under $100K, and it's a winner!

its carbon for a reason.

Wesley Crusher · 12 October 2016, 04:16 AM

Cool looking car. In sure the wing is totally functional so removing it would be counterproductive.

I do not like the black/CF trunk, though. It looks like it belongs on a 1990s Civic, not a 100K+ Mercedes.

keschete · 12 October 2016, 04:22 AM

I agree they need a revamp past the rear tires.

Rolex addict · 12 October 2016, 05:01 AM

Meh. I'll get out there and smoke it in my Crown Vic!!

Etschell · 13 October 2016, 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex addict

Meh. I'll get out there and smoke it in my Crown Vic!!

or your minivan loaded with a c6 engine?

RW16610 · 13 October 2016, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

or your minivan loaded with a c6 engine?

Hahahaha

dysondiver · 12 October 2016, 05:03 AM

looks like a hyundi coupe ,,, too much going on with body lines and curves and things ,,, sort of like the nissan juke , tries too hard.
not for me.

keschete · 12 October 2016, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dysondiver

looks like a hyundi coupe ,,, too much going on with body lines and curves and things ,,, sort of like the nissan juke , tries too hard.
not for me.

My little rhyme for the Nissan is "the Nissan Juke makes me wanna Puke"

Dr.Brian · 12 October 2016, 05:20 AM

I don't love the lines either, but I'm sure it's a hell of a ride.

TheRolexKingofLV · 12 October 2016, 05:29 AM

I think it might look alot better if it were black or silver.

I'm sure it's a beast though

77T · 12 October 2016, 05:27 AM

The wing won't make it to final production methinks. It's prolly there to test handling without the driver risking an oversteer incident.

As for Hyundai - they copied the 63's lines long ago so the Sonata looks like an M-B.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ruud Van Driver · 12 October 2016, 05:32 AM

Apart from that ghastly rear wing, I really like it. Way too expensive for me though.

Should give Seth some pause for thought as he recovers

TheBluePrince · 12 October 2016, 05:54 AM

C Coupe is a pretty car on the outside.

The inside is horrid with the awful stick on style fake iPad screen like in the A Class. Lowers and cheapens the car. I would not buy one solely because of this.

blassy · 12 October 2016, 06:08 AM

this sums up my thoughts..........

RW16610 · 12 October 2016, 06:55 AM

This one might have to grow on me in time. Great car I'll bet but not for me.

Dyim · 12 October 2016, 10:47 AM

I guess that's MB's answer to M4 GTS?

rr-nyc · 12 October 2016, 03:58 PM

The wing will be on the production model just as it is on an M4 GTS. There would be no point to put it on a test mule to increase downforce and then remove it for the general public

Rock · 12 October 2016, 05:10 PM

Starts at $163K here in Australia. Doubt you'd get it on the road for under $170K.
Don't mind the side and rear styling but feel the front is not as attractive as previous models. I'd rather have the new 6 speed manual Jaguar F Type Coupe any day.

p.s. notice how the plastic fronts & rears are gradually creeping towards the middle of the cars.

Andad · 12 October 2016, 09:54 PM

I like the shape of and enjoy driving my old '07 AMG

but I think they have lost the plot with the new exterior designs.

DeeTee · 13 October 2016, 01:12 AM

I just can't get over the trunk and tailights.
Whenever Mercedes shrinks down a car (S to C, CLS to CLA) it just doesn't come out right.

But you get the same car for 1/3 of the price, so I guess compromises have to be made.

Danny83 · 13 October 2016, 01:56 AM

Here is a pic of one I saw I thinks its nice Larry

Lukedequ · 13 October 2016, 04:09 AM

**Drools uncontrollably**

But yea, that black tail should be changed. Maybe it'll be an option when they release it in the US...

12 October 2016, 09:29 AM	#5
returntorolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Real Name: Steve Location: Atlanta Watch: Jackie Stewart DD Posts: 5,661	Didn't see the Nurburgring lap time....under 7:45? __________________ Rolex - Tudor - Omega - Breitling - Oris - Grand Seiko - Timex - Casio - Ocean Crawler - Ganymede - American Waltham - Seiko - Gruen - Arethusa - Citizen - Sinn - Nodus - Formex

12 October 2016, 04:22 AM	#11
keschete "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Kaya Location: Louisiana Watch: 116500 Posts: 3,575	I agree they need a revamp past the rear tires. __________________ GMT II BLNR, Submariner, Submariner Serti, Datejust, Daytona C, TT Yacht Master, Hulk Submariner, Pepsi GMT II

12 October 2016, 05:20 AM	#17
Dr.Brian 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: CA dreamin' Watch: ing the market. Posts: 5,906	I don't love the lines either, but I'm sure it's a hell of a ride. __________________ -Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色

12 October 2016, 05:29 AM	#18
TheRolexKingofLV "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Trace Location: Vegas/Bay Area Posts: 9,234	I think it might look alot better if it were black or silver. I'm sure it's a beast though __________________ Official Host "The Penthouse Party" Las Vegas 2018 Instagram @tracenunes

12 October 2016, 05:27 AM	#19
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 42,024	The wing won't make it to final production methinks. It's prolly there to test handling without the driver risking an oversteer incident. As for Hyundai - they copied the 63's lines long ago so the Sonata looks like an M-B. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

12 October 2016, 03:56 AM	#2
Tri-Tip "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: CA, USA Watch: Out!!! Posts: 6,474	Lose the wing, make the trunk lid match the rest of the car, price it under $100K, and it's a winner!

12 October 2016, 10:03 AM	#8
1st amg 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: nicholas Location: ottawa canada Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai Posts: 10,410	I have seen the C63S coupe in the flesh, and it is stunning. The lines actually resemble the S coupe. It looks classy and aggressive all at the same time. The previous generation C63 coupe were horrendous. The C63S coupe is a home run. This R coupe looks a little off with that massive wing.

12 October 2016, 04:16 AM	#10
Wesley Crusher "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Wes Location: Holosuite Posts: 6,345	Cool looking car. In sure the wing is totally functional so removing it would be counterproductive. I do not like the black/CF trunk, though. It looks like it belongs on a 1990s Civic, not a 100K+ Mercedes.

12 October 2016, 05:01 AM	#12
Rolex addict Banned Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: The Enabler Location: South Cackalacky Watch: me crash my bike Posts: 5,564	Meh. I'll get out there and smoke it in my Crown Vic!!

12 October 2016, 05:03 AM	#15
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	looks like a hyundi coupe ,,, too much going on with body lines and curves and things ,,, sort of like the nissan juke , tries too hard. not for me.

12 October 2016, 05:32 AM	#20
Ruud Van Driver "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chopped Liver Location: S. Wales Valleys Watch: Mickey Mouse Posts: 9,926	Apart from that ghastly rear wing, I really like it. Way too expensive for me though. Should give Seth some pause for thought as he recovers __________________ 116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 *"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

12 October 2016, 05:54 AM	#21
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	C Coupe is a pretty car on the outside. The inside is horrid with the awful stick on style fake iPad screen like in the A Class. Lowers and cheapens the car. I would not buy one solely because of this.

12 October 2016, 06:55 AM	#23
RW16610 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Rommel Location: Toronto Canada Watch: 116710LN Posts: 9,203	This one might have to grow on me in time. Great car I'll bet but not for me.

12 October 2016, 10:47 AM	#24
Dyim "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 2,237	I guess that's MB's answer to M4 GTS?

12 October 2016, 03:58 PM	#25
rr-nyc Liar & Ratbag Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Renato Location: NYC / Miami Beach Watch: Rolex Daytona Posts: 5,344	The wing will be on the production model just as it is on an M4 GTS. There would be no point to put it on a test mule to increase downforce and then remove it for the general public

12 October 2016, 05:10 PM	#26
Rock 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Rocky Location: Australia Watch: Grail:Bluesy Posts: 17,850	Starts at $163K here in Australia. Doubt you'd get it on the road for under $170K. Don't mind the side and rear styling but feel the front is not as attractive as previous models. I'd rather have the new 6 speed manual Jaguar F Type Coupe any day. p.s. notice how the plastic fronts & rears are gradually creeping towards the middle of the cars. __________________ Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."

13 October 2016, 01:12 AM	#28
DeeTee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Los Angeles Watch: Netflix Posts: 3,978	I just can't get over the trunk and tailights. Whenever Mercedes shrinks down a car (S to C, CLS to CLA) it just doesn't come out right. But you get the same car for 1/3 of the price, so I guess compromises have to be made.

13 October 2016, 04:09 AM	#30
Lukedequ "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Luke D. Location: Los Angeles Watch: Favre Leuba SeaSky Posts: 11	Drools uncontrollably But yea, that black tail should be changed. Maybe it'll be an option when they release it in the US...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)