|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
18 October 2016, 02:00 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Nick
Location: CT
Watch: Rolex, Lange
Posts: 185
|
Questions on PAM 560
Would a PAM 560 look good in this collection? How does it look size wise on my wrist? This is the top contender for my next purchase.
|
|
|
|
18 October 2016, 04:36 AM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Great collection you have and its fit you well
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2016, 05:13 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,964
|
OT, that AP RO is 41mm? It looks bigger than the 40mm Milgauss with much longer lug to lug :)
And yes, you need a PAM ;)
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
|
|
|
|
18 October 2016, 05:20 AM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Nick
Location: CT
Watch: Rolex, Lange
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2016, 05:17 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
A pam would fit nicely in your collection.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
|
|
|
|
18 October 2016, 05:21 AM
|
#6 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Nick
Location: CT
Watch: Rolex, Lange
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 October 2016, 06:04 AM
|
#7 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
"Yes" and "great"! Pre-congrats on the new addition.
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2016, 12:19 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
|
yes....looks great, enjoy
__________________
dp just living the dream chicago, usa chgo_risti on IG |
|
|
|
|
19 October 2016, 12:32 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Dave
Location: E.U.
Watch: ing the GBP fall.
Posts: 320
|
A really super collection, and the 560 looks great.
I actually went to buy the 352 but after trying them found the 560 a much better fit for me. I think the flat back and not a bubble back helped me. Look forward to more pics of "your new" 560 Here's mine ...... 
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2016, 02:34 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
|
Definitely need a PAM
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
|
|
|
20 October 2016, 03:36 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
|
Nice collection that certainly needs a Panerai added.
Looks good, big but not overhanging!
__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one. |
|
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 02:51 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Gerald
Location: Rub Al Khali
Watch: Zenith EP tricolor
Posts: 27
|
Absolutely, its about time a pam muscles its way in that collection. Yes agree with checking visually vs your physique as camera wristshot (esp from phones) are a bit distorted. Lug to lug vs your wrist is perfect though. Base pams are always winners and you have there the sandwich dial which i prefer (latest series are painted). Good luck! Also 562 with its ti case has a warmer feel
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
