Some different views of the Deep Sea

[clbcpa]

Alot of the posts from TRF members refer to wanting to see the size of the Deep Sea in person. Rather than wait, I have tried to take several shots of the Deep Sea comparing size to other models while on my wrist. Some are not the greatest shots but I hope these will help. Please for give the quality and the date on the camera as I had to change battery and did not reset.

[valentine]

thanks for the pics! that thing IS a monster! but beautiful....and Is next on my list right after bluesy! nice collection carey.

[JF23]

Great comparisons Carey.

[worktolivelife]

Thanks for your efforts

steve

[Z-Sub]

Somehow I still like "the other watches" in your photos better than the DSSD

[scottjal]

Originally Posted by Z-Sub

Somehow I still like "the other watches" in your photos better than the DSSD

X2

Thanks for posting Carey, excellent comparison shots!

[clbcpa]

It is quite large but its not the face that is striking. It is the thickness.. The weight is heavier than a normal Sea Dweller but not nearly as heavy as the all gold daytona at 220gms!. IMHO the best feature is the glidelock system. It is awesome for varying bracelet size quickly! Hope to see that in other models!

[Clarence]

Amazing to me that they put a 20 mm bracelet on that thing. Looks ridiculous. Whatever is layin around, eh?

[nocampo]

Originally Posted by Clarence

Amazing to me that they put a 20 mm bracelet on that thing. Looks ridiculous. Whatever is layin around, eh?

Look on the brighter side, a bigger bracelet would have definitely added to the cost of DeepSea.

-Nelson

[chevycorvette]

i do not mind the thickness. but i can not take it when rolex relocated the word (original gas escape valve & the ring lock system) from the back of the case to the dial area.

it is like relocating ur back door and use it as ur front door.

[Falck]

Nice pictures!!!

The date on the Deep Sea hangs a little down??

[allill]

I like your screensaver, I have the same one. Man, the Deep Sea is huge!

[Falck]

See the 3rd picture! The date look like its hanging!! Does the date start to change so early?????

[Octopus]

What an utterly ridiculous watch.

[toph]

great pictures. it is not the size thats wrong (43mm is fine)- it is the fatness and bulk of it that puts me off.

[clbcpa]

Originally Posted by toph

great pictures. it is not the size thats wrong (43mm is fine)- it is the fatness and bulk of it that puts me off.

Exactly!

[Trurolexer]

Just PERFECT!!!

You have A PERFECT COLLECTION!!!

[clbcpa]

Originally Posted by Trurolexer

Just PERFECT!!!

You have A PERFECT COLLECTION!!!

Thanks very much!

[cstegall]

Carey,

Thanks so much for the comparison pics. I have been wearing a YMII for a bit so the top view size of the watch is not that outrageous. Even the thickness looks a lot like my clown watch. The fact that the dial looks out of proportion to the watch design is what puts me off a bit.

Still a Rolex, still a nice watch and the next time I am visiting the Titanic I will make sure that the DSSD is down there with me!

[jdc]

Thanks for sharing, the pictures are quite striking, especially comparing the thickness between the Daytona and DSSD

[Falck]

Look on 3rd pic! The date seem to hang???

[DL477]

Thanks for giving good comparison photos. It is REALLY BIG in size but your wrist is thick enough to match her.

[swatty]

Thanks for those great pics , Its to fat for me

[walds11]

Thanks for the pics Carey. Way yo big and thick for my liking. That thing must feel like a ton on your wrist.

[Oscar]

The more and more I see that big hunk of metal I want one...........

[clbcpa]

I do wonder what it would have looked like on a larger than 20mm bracelet. I am finding myself be careful not to bump into doorways, desks, etc because I am aware of the thickness. Dont know if I will get used to that. To be honest. I wish Rolex had just added the glidelock and blue lume( which I think was a really good idea for diving) to the regular Sea Dweller and forgotten about the huge change in depth which is practically unusable anyway. Could the plan all along have been for this to be a short run production watch?

I dont really think so myself but might make for any interesting discussion.

[toph]

Originally Posted by clbcpa

I do wonder what it would have looked like on a larger than 20mm bracelet. I am finding myself be careful not to bump into doorways, desks, etc because I am aware of the thickness. Dont know if I will get used to that. To be honest. I wish Rolex had just added the glidelock and blue lume( which I think was a really good idea for diving) to the regular Sea Dweller and forgotten about the huge change in depth which is practically unusable anyway. Could the plan all along have been for this to be a short run production watch?

I dont really think so myself but might make for any interesting discussion.

yeah it is interesting. why did the make it look so fat. for me it just ruins the refinement of a rolex which i find so attractive. i personally think sales might drop off in fairly short space of time - But that is just what i think.

[clbcpa]

Also, I see where a couple of members are asking if the date is hanging. It is not. I think its just the image angle from the camera

[redshirt1957]

Thanks for the side by side comparisons. I think I will want one in 20 years, if I am still alive and kicking.

[Tony-GB]

FANTASTIC PICS!!

Love the YM & DS comparison. Hmmmmm..... Want one now.....

Thanks for sharing