ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 January 2017, 07:02 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
|
Pricing Differentials (aka Justifying the Platona)
I have always thought the pricing differential of the Daytona between stainless steel and platinum was crazy. $12,400 vs. $75,000. But the real life difference is a lot less. The 116500C has a "market" price north of $15,000 and the 116506 is about $45,000-$50,000. Still a giant difference for the same watch made with different materials. I readily admit that.
But I was googling the AP 15400, just to see what it was. The stainless steel (watch and bracelet) retails for $16,900. In "pink gold," it is $64,800. Now that is egregious! OK, I'm justifying. But still... Thoughts?
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016) |
16 January 2017, 07:08 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,223
|
I'd say for the amount of Platinum you get, compared to other Platinum watches, the Platona is a bargain.
|
16 January 2017, 07:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
The counter argument is you still get the same movement you get in the base watch. Alternatively look at the price point of the pt version and ask yourself which other watch you could buy. E.g. a lightly owned Lange Datograph in pt with a phenomenal movement and a date thrown in.
|
16 January 2017, 08:10 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,223
|
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2017, 11:51 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
A lot
If you go to a site with a Lange forum then you will find out why the Datograph is so highly regarded: it's like the difference between a Porsche 911 Turbo vs a Pagani Huayra.
|
16 January 2017, 08:03 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,509
|
For me owning the PT version is about certain feelings I get when wearing it...I guess I mean the intangibles. It's not about the metal. (other than the weight, which is awesome!) Owning the Platinum version, IMHO, is just special. Maybe some other owners can chime in with what I'm trying to express. :)
|
16 January 2017, 08:11 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,223
|
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2017, 09:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
|
Oh, I am completely thrilled with the Platona. This was kinda tongue in cheek. But also just a comparison of SS vs. Pt premiums for watches in the same line.
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016) |
16 January 2017, 08:12 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: GMTII / DaytonaC
Posts: 252
|
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2017, 08:11 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
|
No need to justify, just do it!!! You won't regret it. Feel free to skip the urine remover, though.
|
16 January 2017, 11:25 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: LSU
Watch: Constantly changes
Posts: 3,815
|
|
16 January 2017, 08:12 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Not egregious when the AP SS can easily be bought for less than the D500 and that AP RG can be bought for under 50K like the Platona, it's really all the same and yes it's all pretty crazy.
|
16 January 2017, 09:53 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Yeah...when you get into PM, rational thought kinda goes out the window.
Actually, this really begins when you start looking at spending thousands of dollars on a watch. OK...I've got to ask, Chad, what are two guys with Platonas doing with urine remover? |
16 January 2017, 09:59 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
|
Just a typical trip to Target with Dr. Tom and family.
|
16 January 2017, 11:23 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,122
|
|
16 January 2017, 10:08 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
I can buy a timex for 10 bucks.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
16 January 2017, 10:20 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Watch: RG Olive DD40
Posts: 1,795
|
Whew. Gotta stop looking at pictures of the 116506. Must resist temptation!
|
16 January 2017, 10:49 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
Quote:
Also, you can't compare retail and "market" price. |
|
16 January 2017, 11:32 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
|
Quote:
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ex...mm-and-15450-3 "The pricing of the 15400 is as follows: In steel it is $16,900. In pink gold on a leather strap as seen above, it is $33,800. In pink gold on a pink gold bracelet, it is $64,800. " I clearly should have checked multiple sources or realized that the article was five years old and were no longer representative.
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016) |
|
16 January 2017, 11:37 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2017, 11:04 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 118
|
I'm just curious why gold watches are less expensive than platinum - looks like gold is actually the same price or even slightly more expensive at the moment
|
16 January 2017, 11:33 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
Quote:
Im sure there are other reasons I don't know about, or forgetting to mention too. |
|
16 January 2017, 11:50 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2017, 04:58 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116333
Posts: 415
|
I think that it does not matter that Pt is more dense than Au. Pt watch are perceived as top of the line and that's why they are priced so high. Difference in material costs is quite small comparing to the difference of price between gold and platinum watches.
|
16 January 2017, 03:07 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
Platinum is only $32,000 per kilo! So calculate how much Rolex and in fact every watch company is making on precious metals - its actually a staggering huge margin.
Your paying for the manufacturing not the gold content. |
16 January 2017, 03:55 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
|
This is reserved for my 10th anniversary with wife next year. Such an amazing watch...pictures do it no justice and the presence on your wrist is breathtaking. Once a certain trusted seller with identical wrist size let me wear his....it was over for me.
|
16 January 2017, 05:30 PM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Have you checked the price of a platinum AP or PP? I think you'll find that Rolex was CHEAP in comparison.
|
16 January 2017, 07:15 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,332
|
The amount of gold or platinum in a PM watch amounts to a few thousand dollars. That is not what sets the price of PM watches. It is marketing. SS < TT < Gold < Pt. Any PT watch is more exclusive than Gold which is more exclusive than TT... SS etc.
Years ago I had my wife's engagement and wedding rings custom made. The difference in cost between using gold and pt was the cost of the material. Not twice the cost. It was itemized on the quotes they gave me based on the market price of the material. I'm sure if you are machining these metals there might be a difference in labor, but the large price difference in these watches is for exclusivity. A big reason their market value drops so quickly as used watches. |
16 January 2017, 10:17 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 249
|
As others have stated, the cost price of raw materials, extra machining costs etc. are only a small part of the pricing premium - the rest is emotion, perceived rarity, looks & marketing - this article is excellent on the topic: http://quillandpad.com/2016/12/18/he...recious-metal/
|
16 January 2017, 10:53 PM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
None of it really makes sense. Buy what you like the most.
I went through the same thing with the BLNR vs BLRO but knew which I preferred. I stopped trying to justify it and just did it. Zero regrets. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.