ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
2 February 2017, 09:03 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ND
Posts: 511
|
Collectible?
Going to be in the market for a lnib 16610 full set. Should I try to find one of the later year subs with engraved rehaut? Could they some day be considered a collectible transition model? Does anybody that has a 16610 wish it had the engraved rehaut? When I had my last 16610 I didn't really think about it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 February 2017, 09:17 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
I've got a m serial with the engraved rehaut and between the lugs. I doubt it will ever considered a collectible or given a big premium. If you want collectible go for a 16610LV
__________________
|
2 February 2017, 09:21 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Socal
Posts: 861
|
Engraved rehaut or not there so many 16610 out there they are not rare. Just buy what you like and enjoy it.
|
2 February 2017, 09:20 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
|
Collectible, I doubt it. Just far to many out there in the world, and with only minimal changes over such a long production run. Engraving or otherwise....
Just find the best condition watch you can, for a price you are happy with, and enjoy it for years to come. The value will then be, that it was your watch to hand down to the new generation of your family. Don't you already have a 16610?
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
2 February 2017, 09:46 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ND
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
|
|
2 February 2017, 09:24 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 40
|
My personal choice would be the model with SEL and lug holes. I believe model years A, P, K, Y - approx. 1999 to 2003 - not sure there is a huge collectable difference for any of the 16610. I would be more interested in condition and papers.
Rob |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.