ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

BreitSF · 15 April 2017, 12:17 AM

Hi Everybody, wondering if anyone else has gone from a GMT Ceramic or SubC back to the older versions. I'm thinking of making this trade (hopefully with some cash coming my way).

I originally traded a 16610 for the 116710 last Fall and have been missing my old Sub ever since. I'm thinking that means I need to go back.

Chad072 · 15 April 2017, 12:21 AM

The crazy thing would be to keep something you're not completely satisfied with.

douglasf13 · 15 April 2017, 01:19 AM

We all like different things, so just go for it. I never thought I'd trade my SubDate for an Exp II, and it's the only watch I've worn since.

LuminousMaximus · 15 April 2017, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad072

The crazy thing would be to keep something you're not completely satisfied with.

His reasoning is sound...

brandrea · 15 April 2017, 01:21 AM

Not crazy at all.

I wouldn't count on any money coming your way Infact, you'll most likely have to add funds for a decent example

997.2 · 22 December 2018, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandrea

Not crazy at all.

I wouldn't count on any money coming your way Infact, you'll most likely have to add funds for a decent example

Agreed. The aluminum bezels pricing is going to where it should be. Up. They’re bangers. I totally support a trade for a preceramic sub!!

HogwldFLTR · 15 April 2017, 01:42 AM

Went from 114060 >>> 14060!!! Been there and done that; I can happily live with the non-C!!! Much prefer the 14060.

Snow-Dweller · 15 April 2017, 01:50 AM

Personally, I wouldn't be able to go back to the older bracelet.

reed · 20 December 2018, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snow-Dweller

Personally, I wouldn't be able to go back to the older bracelet.

I love so many older and vintage references, but I can't get over how insubstantial the bracelets and clasps feel. I admit I wish it didn't bother me.

CPRWATCH · 20 December 2018, 11:32 PM

Sold my SubC for this , & definitely no regrets .

sensui · 15 April 2017, 01:50 AM

It's never too late.....just swap the watch if you're not feeling it. I would just have reservations when it's a hot piece that's still going up in value...then you have to think more carefully.....not the case here.

c41006 · 15 April 2017, 01:53 AM

Change it!

dman · 15 April 2017, 01:59 AM

Like trading a perfect steak for another perfect steak. Both great timeless watches. Wear what makes you smile.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Cru Jones · 15 April 2017, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dman

Like trading a perfect steak for another perfect steak. Both great timeless watches. Wear what makes you smile.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This! :-)

lhawli · 15 April 2017, 02:07 AM

I went 16610 to 116710 to 116610 and I love the new SubC date.

The GMT for me was too busy, especially the bezel and I found the functionality in today's world, where I can use my cell to tell time back home.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Robbyman · 15 April 2017, 02:12 AM

I had 116610, sold it after 2 years as it never did it for me. The watch has was a major disappointment when I had always wanted a Sub but it was the wrong Sub.

Bought a BLNR and wore that for a year, still have it and prefer the slightly narrower lugs over the SubC.

Bought a nos 16610 about three weeks ago as an impulse buy with the blessing of the missus. It is the watch I always wanted.

The BLNR will go now I think as i feel it is too bulky and big and blingy against the Sub.

I will be left with the 16610 and a white dial DaytonaC. I will then add an Explorer or OP red grape I think.

Those ceramic watches are just too over the top for me.

BreitSF · 15 April 2017, 02:54 AM

Thanks for making me feel better about this everyone.

SeaDweller50 · 15 April 2017, 03:17 AM

Go for it. Why not? The 16610 is the ultimate classic Rolex.

AK797 · 15 April 2017, 03:40 AM

I wouldn't, 5 digits are looking less apealing to me every day.

997.2 · 22 December 2018, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

I wouldn't, 5 digits are looking less apealing to me every day.

I would, five digits are looking more appealing to me every day.

The Libertine · 15 April 2017, 03:45 AM

I would take that 5 digit Submariner all day long over the current generation GMT.

HL65 · 15 April 2017, 03:53 AM

I would for sure and opposite of Neil 6 digits are looking less appealing to me every day. I love my 5 digits and to me they are perfect! So yes go for it - why not!

Chewbacca · 15 April 2017, 03:58 AM

do it.

HogwldFLTR · 15 April 2017, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HL65

I would for sure and opposite of Neil 6 digits are looking less appealing to me every day. I love my 5 digits and to me they are perfect! So yes go for it - why not!

Totally agree except for watches which weren't made in 5 digits!

Daytonaman799 · 15 April 2017, 04:47 AM

love the 5 Digit watches. The only 6 Digit watch I truly love unabashedly in the Exp II. I wish you could use the bracelets on the 6 on the 5's bec I think they are simply nicer looking watches. I would go back if you aren't happy.

Vishy26 · 15 April 2017, 05:08 AM

Have 116610 and 16610, currently am wearing only the five digit submariner. Though the ceramic version looks more attractive, it doesn't look like a watch to my eyes. I don't have 116710 but I can tell you, even if I do, I would still prefer 16610 over it. I think the only other five digit ref that comes close to it or equals it is 16710

douglasf13 · 15 April 2017, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vishy26

Have 116610 and 16610, currently am wearing only the five digit submariner. Though the ceramic version looks more attractive, it doesn't look like a watch to my eyes. I don't have 116710 but I can tell you, even if I do, I would still prefer 16610 over it. I think the only other five digit ref that comes close to it or equals it is 16710

I think the 16610/16710/16570 triplets will be missed more and more as time passes, since they were essentially the same tool watches where you "pick your function." It just depends what you want. I mean, I actually traded my 16610 in for a 16570, which would be heresy on this forum.

Vishy26 · 15 April 2017, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by douglasf13

I think the 16610/16710/16570 triplets will be missed more and more as time passes, since they were essentially the same tool watches where you "pick your function." It just depends what you want. I mean, I actually traded my 16610 in for a 16570, which would be heresy on this forum.

Agreed, with its white dial, 16570 serves as a good change up

.

mailman · 15 April 2017, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Libertine

I would take that 5 digit Submariner all day long over the current generation GMT.

A month ago I considered flipping a 116610LV for a 116710LN. After a few days I came to my senses and flipped the LVC for a pristine and complete set 16610LN. I couldn't be happier

The other two serious choices were a 16600 and 4 Line 14060M...which I love

Quote:

Originally Posted by douglasf13

I think the 16610/16710/16570 triplets will be missed more and more as time passes, since they were essentially the same tool watches where you "pick your function." It just depends what you want. I mean, I actually traded my 16610 in for a 16570, which would be heresy on this forum.

I agree with your thoughts on the triplets

I also don't think you're crazy for the flip you made. I've considered the 16570'a few times. I actually love that reference. I use the bezel to time things more than I do a second time zone. One never knows though

yjfang · 15 April 2017, 05:15 AM

I did. Most 6 digit references have disproportionate watch cases with the over sized lugs. The right way to make a bigger watch is with the new 43MM Sea Dweller. Notice how the lugs are not over sized and with wider bracelet.

15 April 2017, 12:17 AM	#1
BreitSF "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Florida Posts: 40	Am I crazy? Trading a 116710 to go back to a 16610 Hi Everybody, wondering if anyone else has gone from a GMT Ceramic or SubC back to the older versions. I'm thinking of making this trade (hopefully with some cash coming my way). I originally traded a 16610 for the 116710 last Fall and have been missing my old Sub ever since. I'm thinking that means I need to go back.

15 April 2017, 12:21 AM	#2
Chad072 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Houston, TX Watch: Out! Posts: 298	The crazy thing would be to keep something you're not completely satisfied with. __________________ Citizen BL5250-02L & AT0100-51A Casio G-Shock GW6900-1 Seiko SKX007 & SRP313K2 Omega SMP 2254.50 Rolex Submariner 16610

15 April 2017, 01:42 AM	#7
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,693	Went from 114060 >>> 14060!!! Been there and done that; I can happily live with the non-C!!! Much prefer the 14060. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

15 April 2017, 01:50 AM	#8
Snow-Dweller 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Clive Location: The Alps Watch: collections change Posts: 6,284	Personally, I wouldn't be able to go back to the older bracelet. __________________ . The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.

20 December 2018, 11:32 PM	#10
CPRWATCH "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Real Name: Paul Location: Chester UK Watch: Rolex GMT Master Posts: 4,600	Sold my SubC for this , & definitely no regrets . Attached Images

15 April 2017, 01:19 AM	#3
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,622	We all like different things, so just go for it. I never thought I'd trade my SubDate for an Exp II, and it's the only watch I've worn since.

15 April 2017, 01:21 AM	#5
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,090	Not crazy at all. I wouldn't count on any money coming your way Infact, you'll most likely have to add funds for a decent example

15 April 2017, 01:50 AM	#11
sensui 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 12,443	It's never too late.....just swap the watch if you're not feeling it. I would just have reservations when it's a hot piece that's still going up in value...then you have to think more carefully.....not the case here.

15 April 2017, 01:53 AM	#12
c41006 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Joshua Location: Atlanta Watch: Pelagos Posts: 7,933	Change it!

15 April 2017, 01:59 AM	#13
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	Like trading a perfect steak for another perfect steak. Both great timeless watches. Wear what makes you smile. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

15 April 2017, 02:07 AM	#15
lhawli "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Montreal, QC Posts: 1,256	I went 16610 to 116710 to 116610 and I love the new SubC date. The GMT for me was too busy, especially the bezel and I found the functionality in today's world, where I can use my cell to tell time back home. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]

15 April 2017, 02:12 AM	#16
Robbyman "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Blighty (England) Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub Posts: 1,517	Am I crazy? Trading a 116710 to go back to a 16610 I had 116610, sold it after 2 years as it never did it for me. The watch has was a major disappointment when I had always wanted a Sub but it was the wrong Sub. Bought a BLNR and wore that for a year, still have it and prefer the slightly narrower lugs over the SubC. Bought a nos 16610 about three weeks ago as an impulse buy with the blessing of the missus. It is the watch I always wanted. The BLNR will go now I think as i feel it is too bulky and big and blingy against the Sub. I will be left with the 16610 and a white dial DaytonaC. I will then add an Explorer or OP red grape I think. Those ceramic watches are just too over the top for me.

15 April 2017, 02:54 AM	#17
BreitSF "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Florida Posts: 40	Thanks for making me feel better about this everyone.

15 April 2017, 03:17 AM	#18
SeaDweller50 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Sandy Location: England. Watch: 14060M 2 liner Posts: 3,204	Go for it. Why not? The 16610 is the ultimate classic Rolex.

15 April 2017, 03:40 AM	#19
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	I wouldn't, 5 digits are looking less apealing to me every day.

15 April 2017, 03:45 AM	#21
The Libertine Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Mike Location: BOS Watch: 16710;14060;214270 Posts: 6,375	I would take that 5 digit Submariner all day long over the current generation GMT.

15 April 2017, 03:53 AM	#22
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,006	I would for sure and opposite of Neil 6 digits are looking less appealing to me every day. I love my 5 digits and to me they are perfect! So yes go for it - why not! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

15 April 2017, 03:58 AM	#23
Chewbacca Banned Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: CJ Location: Kashyyyk Watch: Kessel Run Chrono Posts: 21,112	do it.

15 April 2017, 04:47 AM	#25
Daytonaman799 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: NYC/South Fl Watch: Rolex, Patek Posts: 3,693	love the 5 Digit watches. The only 6 Digit watch I truly love unabashedly in the Exp II. I wish you could use the bracelets on the 6 on the 5's bec I think they are simply nicer looking watches. I would go back if you aren't happy.

15 April 2017, 05:08 AM	#26
Vishy26 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Krishna Location: Australia Posts: 611	Have 116610 and 16610, currently am wearing only the five digit submariner. Though the ceramic version looks more attractive, it doesn't look like a watch to my eyes. I don't have 116710 but I can tell you, even if I do, I would still prefer 16610 over it. I think the only other five digit ref that comes close to it or equals it is 16710

15 April 2017, 05:15 AM	#30
yjfang "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: JF Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 Posts: 1,426	I did. Most 6 digit references have disproportionate watch cases with the over sized lugs. The right way to make a bigger watch is with the new 43MM Sea Dweller. Notice how the lugs are not over sized and with wider bracelet.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)