ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 April 2017, 11:00 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
47mm???
After selling my 510 a few years ago, the Panerai bug has bit me again as my small collection is begging for one. In all seriousness, I am missing the versatility that a Panerai brings (with its strap changes) and generally just the clean and unmistakable look of Panerai. I always thought a 44 was too big but realized that after owning a 510, you either go big or go home with a Panerai...within reason of course.
I was (and still am) pretty close to pulling the trigger on the 533 - love the look of the ecru dial, appreciate the technical complications, etc. A lot of love for the 233 on the forum and don't get me wrong, love it too...but just felt a little 'cold' and more tool watch oriented after trying it on a few times. And I think I like having that extra 3 or 9 on the dial. That said, I recently tried on the 422. Never really considered it due to the size. And wow...blown away at how much I loved it on the wrist. The hands, the dial, the manual movement, the PR on the back...just ticking every box for me. Not to mention the huge delta in price (in retail anyway)! It sat flatter than the 233 and the 335, both of which I did get to try on and I'm assuming the 533 will feel the same. Felt like it spread the size better. And after spending a few mins with the 422, honestly didn't even feel that large. Taking a step back from the mirror, didn't look that much larger than a 44 other than on paper. Won't go into wrist size and all that stuff but here are some old pics of the 510 on my wrist and some shot of the 422. Seeking honest opinions...is the 422 too big on my wrist? Will I get tired of the 422 due to it being 'large'? Will not be as wearable as a daily due to the size? While I think it's at home on leather, is it as wearable on rubber? Feedback needed and thanks in advance. |
26 April 2017, 11:15 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Norway
Watch: Sea-D, Sky-D
Posts: 134
|
Wear what you're comfortable with, but IMHO it looks best if the lugs don't go outside your wrist...
|
27 April 2017, 12:11 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
|
I absolutely adore the 422 and its next on my list with the hope of getting it sometime this year. With that said it causes me much sadness to say this, but my honest opinion is that I think it looks a bit too big for your wrist. The 44mm you can get away with, but the 47mm just seems a little too big.
For reference this is what it looks like on me... |
27 April 2017, 12:27 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 159
|
I'm a big guy (6'6" ish), and my 47mm Breitling feels huge. I couldn't imagine wearing one of i was under 6'2".
|
27 April 2017, 01:28 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
In these close-up, blown up shots, it looks a little big, but not insane. With thin straps and not much tail, I think you could be fine. And if it's a weekend/casual watch, even better.
But, most important is what you think. |
27 April 2017, 01:33 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Thanks for the early repossess...yeah I'm on the second to the last hole on a standard strap. Even with the 44 there is minimal overhang of the lugs and I was wearing it pretty low on the wrist when trying on the 422. Will spend some more quality time with it this afternoon...get to wear it a little further up the wrist as I typically do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 April 2017, 01:38 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Yes
Posts: 1,509
|
Pams are supposed to be big bold watches. I think the oversized look is great.
|
27 April 2017, 03:23 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 134
|
As much as I love the look of the 422, I think the lug overhang would stop it for me, but just my humble opinion
|
27 April 2017, 03:59 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Watch: White 116500LN
Posts: 876
|
I was in exactly the same situation as you. Had my eye on the 533 but then saw the 422 and was hooked on it. I was also unsure about size and asked opinions on it however I have slightly bigger wrists than you. Just slightly and was given the all clear. It's a bit big on you but I say if you personally love it and won't have regrets. Then go for it!
Now my recently acquired one ;) |
27 April 2017, 10:04 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Hahaha! I just replied to your post! Good thing we weren't at the same
AD!!!! After comparing several models, the 422 was just amazing on the wrist...everything about it from the manual wind, PR indicator, and those gold hands...just amazing. Yes, largest watch I own but honestly did not seem bigger than the 44 on the wrist. And actually I think I was more concerned that the 533 sat higher and the total watch just felt bigger. Love everything about my 422 and excited to be back in the club. Looking forward to adding to the "which Pam are you wearing today" thread :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 April 2017, 11:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Such a brilliantly photogenic piece.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 April 2017, 12:34 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
I'm glad you decided to get it, it looks awesome! Such a cool, badass watch.
To answer the original question - yes it looks big. It's designed to be a big, sporty watch, so it looks just as it's supposed to on you. Panerai doesn't make 47mm watches for people with 10" wrists, they make them for regular people like us who want cool big watches. Congrats! |
27 April 2017, 12:38 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Very nice congratulations
|
27 April 2017, 09:11 PM | #14 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
|
Quote:
OP, congratulations, I think it looks fantastic |
|
6 May 2017, 05:13 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 149
|
Looks great OP, nice pics!
Quote:
|
|
27 April 2017, 02:28 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
Good work going for it! Enjoy & congrats.
|
27 April 2017, 07:48 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
Nice congrats
|
27 April 2017, 08:47 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Looks fantastic, congrats
__________________
|
27 April 2017, 08:54 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Watch: White 116500LN
Posts: 876
|
Oh that is fantastic! Well done! So glad you went ahead with it :)
|
27 April 2017, 09:29 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
|
Congratulations.
|
30 April 2017, 09:50 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Honeymoon weekend with the 422...just loving everything about it. The gold hands really pop when there's just the tiniest bit of light.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 April 2017, 10:59 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
|
Good on yer for going with what you like. Yes, it looks a bit big but then PAMs are supposed to be big. They're not for wallflowers and the shy & retiring types. Congrats
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
1 May 2017, 12:56 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
I have the same body type as a Jose Aldo of the UFC. I rock the 47mm w/ panache. |
|
30 April 2017, 11:09 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,230
|
Do not judge Panerai on size alone. Granted, if you're a skinny dude who prefers to wear tank tops or very slim fitting clothing, a big watch may seem out of place on your wrist. However, if you pair a watch with a chunkier clothing (e.g., a winter sweater) you should be fine. Your outfit and the way you wear the watch counts matters as much as the size.
__________________
Collector and buyer of Lange, VC, Patek | 2 FA Enabled |
30 April 2017, 10:56 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
|
Don't look back! Awesome watch!
|
30 April 2017, 11:48 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Thanks for all the positive comments. And naturally, watches always look bigger on these blown up pics. But as with all watches, really need to try them on to see how they wear on the wrist. Tried to a DSSD and a Big Pilot just to compare and those watches felt and looked way too big on my wrist.
|
6 May 2017, 09:11 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: London
Posts: 18
|
I would love a 47mm, the 00673 is the dream right now. Trying not to trade in me 0012 and pay the difference!
|
6 May 2017, 11:02 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
7 May 2017, 07:18 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Still on honeymoon
|
12 May 2017, 01:08 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,718
|
Presents from my AD! Lovely surprise...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.