ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 April 2017, 01:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Kat
Location: UK
Watch: Seiko GS SD GMT
Posts: 83
|
Venturing into vintage
Hey everyone,
I'm being tempted by a good condition all white 1680 Sub from 1978. It's watch only at £6500. Is that a fair price? And will it be a good choice for daily wear? My alternative is to buy a not-quite vintage SD with drilled lugs. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Regards, Kat |
30 April 2017, 02:54 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
You may want to post pics of the said piece. A brief description doesnt tell us if it is original or if the parts are service replacements which will diminish the value.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
30 April 2017, 05:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Kat
Location: UK
Watch: Seiko GS SD GMT
Posts: 83
|
Images lifted from vendor website
Thanks in anticipation. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Regards, Kat |
30 April 2017, 06:12 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
Pearl looks luminova to me, insert may be service replacement entirely, hands look different than dial plots, case looks very polished. Could just be the ultra harsh light in the dealer prepped photos though. I'll leave it to someone more knowledgeable regarding the asking price being high or not.
|
30 April 2017, 06:14 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
Is HQ Milton the seller? Looks like their pictures
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
31 May 2017, 04:35 PM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
Nope. They don't use that harsh of lighting...and they also don't use a clear plastic watch holder. I'm embarrassed to call that out because it means I've spent way too much time "shopping" on their site...
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
1 May 2017, 07:39 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Quote:
|
|
1 May 2017, 08:56 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.Wales
Posts: 253
|
Looks like this is from Watchfinder?
I think you can do better for £6,500. Replacement hands and bezel insert, case isn't terrible but has seen a fair bit of polishing. I'd continue looking. |
1 May 2017, 11:45 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
|
Replacement hands would bug the heck out of me every time I looked at it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1 May 2017, 04:01 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Kat
Location: UK
Watch: Seiko GS SD GMT
Posts: 83
|
Thanks for all the feedback and comments so far. Pics are taken from The Watch Gallery.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Regards, Kat |
1 May 2017, 06:06 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
The insert is a replacement with Luminova Pearl, the dial is an original mk2 although the colouring on the plots looks uneven in the photo's. In the first photo the hands look like they may be replacements but in the second taken at an angle they look like they COULD be original. It has seen a few polishes. £6,500 is cheap for a White 1680 in the UK, there is a very limited supply and the two on Chrono 24 are both advertised at £8k. At the end of the day there are much better examples (although difficult to find in the UK at present), it depends on what you are willing pay and compromise on. Personally I'd pass and be prepared to pay more
|
1 May 2017, 11:21 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
Get the nicest condition example that your budget will allow. If that means buying a newer watch then that's what you should do, you'll be happier in the long run.
|
31 May 2017, 06:52 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Kat
Location: UK
Watch: Seiko GS SD GMT
Posts: 83
|
Venturing into vintage
Thanks again, folks.
I've ended up with a 2002 16710 Pepsi instead. And within less than 4 weeks, I am now considering a (polished) Fat Lady v an unpolished 2000 16600 SD which costs about £1k less. I'm really tempted by the pristine SD (without the usual NOS price tag) but the 16760 would continue the GMT story quite nicely (I also have a BLNR). As always, I'd be grateful for any comments and advice. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Regards, Kat |
31 May 2017, 08:26 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
Let's see some pics of your new acquisition. The 16710 is a great choice, although most would say it's not vintage. Now the 16760, that would qualify as vintage to most since its certainly pre 1989.
|
31 May 2017, 04:08 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Kat
Location: UK
Watch: Seiko GS SD GMT
Posts: 83
|
I really enjoy the old school aesthetics now. Alas, the bevelled edges on this watch are hardly visible. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Regards, Kat |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.