The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 June 2017, 10:39 AM   #1
G'ed
"TRF" Member
 
G'ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
Rolex Daytona Perpertual/Annual Calendar

What do you think if Rolex updated the 4130 and integrate a modification to facilitate calendar function?

How does it work? Here’s an idea. With start/stop pusher screw in, chronograph function reset and disengaged. 12 Hours counter will function as Month indicator and 30 Mins counter function as Day indicator. How bout 31st? This requires a new small indicator which could also function as Function Indicator (Chrono On/Off).

Optional: Rolex could add another small indicator to show 1/2/3/4 for leap year indication but not required for annual calendar version.

No doubt Rolex could make such caliber, their technical pool is abundant.

G'ed is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 10:40 AM   #2
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
Would be awesome in my opinion. Not that Rolex would ever consider this.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 10:42 AM   #3
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
I prefer the current function with the current price, instead of paying thousands more for functions I don't need on the Daytona.
zjd168 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 10:56 AM   #4
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
I know a lot of people complaining Daytona lack the date function. Please keep in mind that it is marketed and accepted as a racing car sporty model. So what is the date function for?
zjd168 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:04 AM   #5
G'ed
"TRF" Member
 
G'ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by zjd168 View Post
I know a lot of people complaining Daytona lack the date function. Please keep in mind that it is marketed and accepted as a racing car sporty model. So what is the date function for?
Do you expect race driver to actually use the chrono function during racing? Unless speed limit is 20-30mph, I doubt any sane driver will use it to time and read the elapsed time.

Same argument with dive watch with date. Remember when Rolex added the cyclop to the new Sea Dweller?
G'ed is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:14 AM   #6
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by G'ed View Post
Do you expect race driver to actually use the chrono function during racing? Unless speed limit is 20-30mph, I doubt any sane driver will use it to time and read the elapsed time.

Same argument with dive watch with date. Remember when Rolex added the cyclop to the new Sea Dweller?
Wasn't the chrono function originally intended for use by someone at the start/finish line (or wherever) watching the car, rather than driving it?
Old Expat Beast is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:37 AM   #7
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Wasn't the chrono function originally intended for use by someone at the start/finish line (or wherever) watching the car, rather than driving it?
Probably used to calculate split times for stage races (like rallys) with the copilot doing the timing.
JP Chestnut is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:39 AM   #8
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
Probably used to calculate split times for stage races (like rallys) with the copilot doing the timing.
That also makes sense.
Old Expat Beast is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:23 AM   #9
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by G'ed View Post
Do you expect race driver to actually use the chrono function during racing? Unless speed limit is 20-30mph, I doubt any sane driver will use it to time and read the elapsed time.

Same argument with dive watch with date. Remember when Rolex added the cyclop to the new Sea Dweller?
Not the driver. The team manager or race official.
WJGESQ is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:31 AM   #10
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by G'ed View Post
Do you expect race driver to actually use the chrono function during racing? Unless speed limit is 20-30mph, I doubt any sane driver will use it to time and read the elapsed time.

Same argument with dive watch with date. Remember when Rolex added the cyclop to the new Sea Dweller?
No I don't, it's all about the concept and image.

To the Sea Dweller cyclop,yes functionally it is useless. I guess more or less Rolex is trying to show the world its achievement. It was believed that cyclop can cause structural weaknesses and shatter the front before reaching the desired depth of water. Rolex now says its new SD design and technology can safely go 4000ft deep without problem - with the cyclop
zjd168 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 10:58 AM   #11
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
Very slow cars
Quailhunter is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:15 AM   #12
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quailhunter View Post
Very slow cars

Or very long races
Cru Jones is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:50 AM   #13
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quailhunter View Post
Very slow cars
well in theory Daytona can tell the driver reaching up to 400 mph, a speed I am not sure how many race car drivers or cars can achieve.
zjd168 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:00 AM   #14
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
If anything, I think they'll merge the day date and the sky dweller. I think there was a mock up of it at one point that can illustrate it better than my words. Will look...
__________________
mjclark32 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:35 AM   #15
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjclark32 View Post
If anything, I think they'll merge the day date and the sky dweller. I think there was a mock up of it at one point that can illustrate it better than my words. Will look...
An annual calendar in the 36mm daydate case would be an INSTANT buy for me. Lose the second timezone while they're at it.
JP Chestnut is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:10 AM   #16
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
Here's what I was getting at:

__________________
mjclark32 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:35 AM   #17
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
"To the Sea Dweller cyclop,yes functionally it is useless. I guess more or less Rolex is trying to show the world its achievement. It was believed that cyclop can cause structural weaknesses and shatter the front before reaching the desired depth of water. Rolex now says its new SD design and technology can safely go 4000ft deep without problem - with the cyclop"



It's Cyclops in the singular, named after one of these guys. Plural is Cyclopes.
Attached Images
 
Old Expat Beast is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:51 AM   #18
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
"To the Sea Dweller cyclop,yes functionally it is useless. I guess more or less Rolex is trying to show the world its achievement. It was believed that cyclop can cause structural weaknesses and shatter the front before reaching the desired depth of water. Rolex now says its new SD design and technology can safely go 4000ft deep without problem - with the cyclop"



It's Cyclops in the singular, named after one of these guys. Plural is Cyclopes.
Thanks for the correction.
zjd168 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:38 AM   #19
G'ed
"TRF" Member
 
G'ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
Let’s wait for our resident race car driver, Dr Tom, to chime in for his opinion. I bet he need date function to sign his contract :D
G'ed is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 12:18 PM   #20
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by G'ed View Post
Let’s wait for our resident race car driver, Dr Tom, to chime in for his opinion. I bet he need date function to sign his contract :D
I think I remember Dr. Tom saying that he routinely uses his Daytona while driving/racing.

I'm sure he'll check in soon, though.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 12:29 PM   #21
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I think I remember Dr. Tom saying that he routinely uses his Daytona while driving/racing.

I'm sure he'll check in soon, though.
Yeah, but he also said that he sometimes texts while racing too.
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016)
Chiboy is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 01:03 PM   #22
G'ed
"TRF" Member
 
G'ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiboy View Post
Yeah, but he also said that he sometimes texts while racing too.
G'ed is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 01:19 PM   #23
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiboy View Post
Yeah, but he also said that he sometimes texts while racing too.
Tom is a prudent man to be sure, but I'm betting he could pull it off, if he wanted to.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:39 AM   #24
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
A perpetual calendar chronograph is way out there for Rolex, I think an annual or possibly a perpetual on a Day-Date is most likely.
AK797 is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 12:12 PM   #25
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
A perpetual calendar chronograph is way out there for Rolex, I think an annual or possibly a perpetual on a Day-Date is most likely.
Interesting thought about a Rolex perpetual calendar. Rolex had triple calendars way back before most forum members were born, but have long since been discontinued. I am sure Rolex can develop their own perpetual calendar movement in-house. However whether they will is another question.

Since Rolex has a solid annual calendar and a chronograph, it seems more likely for Rolex to come out with an AC chrono watch as their most complicated watch.
jon_jon is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 11:52 AM   #26
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Old Expat Beast is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 02:05 PM   #27
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
That dial can't take any more stuff. It's too cluttered and difficult to read as is.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
tomchicago is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 03:04 PM   #28
kauffee
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
If I had to guess, I'd say the issue is volume/scale. While Rolex could no doubt design high complications like perpetual calendars, producing them at the high volumes that Rolex customers want and then servicing them in the future would probably strain resources.
kauffee is offline  
Old 23 June 2017, 06:27 PM   #29
ssetem
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Watch: blro,daytc,lv,blnr
Posts: 233
flyback chrono would be nice
ssetem is offline  
Old 25 June 2017, 06:37 AM   #30
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssetem View Post
flyback chrono would be nice
Is the daytona flyback, I am too scared to check lol. Daytona rattrapante would be something I would like to see.
breitlings is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.