ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
7 November 2008, 01:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Zenith Daytona Question
Hi All
Daytona's are appealing to me more & more, but why are the Zenith models worth more & are so sought after? As I understand it, the Daytona's with the inhouse Rolex movement have a better power reserve, are more accurate & have a more robust movement. So what's the appeal of the Zenith...? Thanks in advance
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
7 November 2008, 01:44 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Just rarer. The unwanteds at the time.
Something to collect. The SS again are worth more. There are also subtle differences on the dial.
__________________
member#3242 |
7 November 2008, 02:49 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
There's a huge difference as well with the orientation of the sub dials As for the Zenith Daytonas, i have to say i'm not a fan, i love the El Primero movement, had three of them and they are works of art and as accurate as anything else on the market, but Rolex detuned them and didn't use the date function, so you're not really getting a true EP movement, it was more an EP movement that Rolex wanted to mess about with to try and make it sound like it wasn't just someone elses movement stuck in their case. As for power reserve, i wouldn't look too much into that, it really isn't a huge selling point, infact now you're getting 7. 8 and 10 day reserve watches from others which i wouldn't really rate as being better than either the EP or the Rolex movements, they've just used an area of the movement for power reserve instead.
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
|
7 November 2008, 02:12 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Well I would not say the Zenith is less accurate than the Rolex in-house movement.And the El-Primo movement has been around for almost 40 years so its a well proven reliable in its true form very high beat movement.While the Rolex in-house is a fine movement with a good power reserve but in movement term its still only a youngster.The Zenith powered Daytona was quite a short run so less of them around and definitely more collectable now and in future.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
7 November 2008, 02:18 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
The Zenith SS was the first Daytona to have a supply/demand problem.
I remember a 1997 one being offered well over retail back in 1999.
__________________
..33 |
7 November 2008, 02:21 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
The dials have a bit more contrast in the Zenith as well.
The white dial with the black sub-dial surrounds is most appealing. |
7 November 2008, 03:38 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
Power reserve in the new movement is 72 hours.
That is a big deal for me, because my watch sits from Friday afternoon until Monday head to the office and I don't need to reset it. Very Kool. |
7 November 2008, 03:50 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Running it right down and not giving it a wind isn't the best way of working the watch, if i'm not wearing it for a few days i make sure to give it a manual wind every day just to keep it ticking over, i just don't see power reserve being a huge selling point, otherwise the daytona would be seen as completely inferior to the likes of the PAM270 which has over 3 times the reserve.
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
|
7 November 2008, 04:30 AM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
I think that Zeniths are getting their 15 minutes of fame because people are seeing what the early Cosmographs and Paul Newman's are going for..
Everybody is jumping on the "discontinued model" bandwagon...even if bazillions of them were made..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
7 November 2008, 04:37 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: montreal
Posts: 459
|
I traded my zenith straight to a z series and I didn't think about it twice...
|
7 November 2008, 06:06 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
"Running it right down and not giving it a wind isn't the best way of working the watch"
Says Argee. It is not a battery, it's a spring. Allowing it to become partially unsprung is not in any dimension detrimental. |
7 November 2008, 06:10 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Ryan
Location: England
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
You're right, but i tend to keep it within a similar tension, just something i like to do. But as i said, power reserve means nothing to me, 2 days or 3 days, it makes no difference to me, if it did i'd go out and get an 8 or 10 day reserve watch.
__________________
PANERAI, MORE THAN A WATCH, LESS THAN A KITKAT
|
|
7 November 2008, 01:30 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: US
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 98
|
Is it true the 4130 Daytona movement is cheaper to make than the Zenith movement and that's why Rolex went in-house?
|
8 November 2008, 02:11 AM | #14 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
The 4130 was designed from the ground up by Rolex, specifically to be an in-house chronograph unique to Rolex only - they do not want to rely on another manufacturer for movements for their watches. It includes some of their own patents for certain, mechanics and engages the stopwatch function fully into the basic mechanics of the watch when activated to avoid chrono drift, reduce size foot-print, and reduce the number of parts in the movement.. It's considered to be one of the best movements to come along in quite some time, and one of the ten top movements ever.. So, no, I would not say that they just wanted to reduce costs.. I would say that the 4130 is a better, more modern and more sophisticated movement than the Zenith.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
7 November 2008, 05:08 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Andrew Marton
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 16750 Pam 48
Posts: 117
|
On another note, I have seen Zenith Daytona's with the inverted 6 sub dials. Is there any more value to that dial verses the more modern (?) dial.
|
7 November 2008, 06:01 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
4130 is easier to service
it has slightly longer power reserve it winds faster to full reserve and 4030 is as accurate as 4130.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.