ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SLS · 12 November 2008, 05:30 AM

I viewed this watch this morning and would like some feedback.

Dial

Model #

Serial # Does this printing look correct. If legit, any idea of its age.

Caseback

Inside the caseback

Movement

Thanks for your help,
~Scott

TimeToGo · 12 November 2008, 08:13 AM

The case looks original. It also appears someone tampered with the serial number though.

RLX-lvr · 12 November 2008, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeToGo

The case looks original. It also appears someone tampered with the serial number though.

Agreed. The serial # engraving looks way off, doesnt look like it matches the model number style of engraving.

Jeff

SLS · 12 November 2008, 08:54 AM

Here is another pic of the serial. I left the last number out for comparison...

I have seen a few "B" that look crooked but the rest of the numbers?
~Scott

stevemulholland3 · 12 November 2008, 09:37 AM

sometimes they look distorted like that in photos when there are ridges,how did it look in person?
other than that bad picture it looks legit.however if that serial looks that bad in person then something is very wrong.

stevemulholland3 · 12 November 2008, 09:39 AM

also can you get another picture of the other side of the movement(where the rotor is covering),that is a 7750 movement and if I can see the other side it will tell me more about the quality of manufacture..

SLS · 12 November 2008, 10:04 AM

Here are the last two pics I have

~Scott

springer · 12 November 2008, 10:49 AM

My initial observation is this chrono has had the hell beaten out of it and was probably worn at Normandy, or darn well could have been judging from the condition, but since Tudor wasn't around until 1946 I guess maybe that couldn't be possible.

It does look genuine though. Somebody might have tried to etch the numbers back on the case to make them more visible due to excessive wear. Lot better buys than that out there, unless he is asking $100. Could cost plenty to bring that old vintage piece back to life.

stevemulholland3 · 12 November 2008, 11:11 AM

its easily worth a grand...you will put about 800 into it and still have a decent deal.
I have a brand new old stock bracelet for that....hmmmm.lol

springer · 12 November 2008, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevemulholland3

its easily worth a grand...you will put about 800 into it and still have a decent deal.
I have a brand new old stock bracelet for that....hmmmm.lol

All right Stevey, maybe I'd go $110.

stevemulholland3 · 12 November 2008, 04:47 PM

you cheapskate john,
I dont know how you have any watches at all!!....lol
p.s. I have a few gmts for you...what are you looking for?

Dan Pierce · 12 November 2008, 10:57 PM

PM sent.

That serial # worries me.
dP

bagel · 12 November 2008, 11:44 PM

Everything looks ok to me except the serial number which also worries me ......

1MAC · 13 November 2008, 01:54 AM

The seller appears to have herpes on his thumb. That would keep me from buying his watch.

tudorman8276 · 13 November 2008, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1MAC

The seller appears to have herpes on his thumb. That would keep me from buying his watch.

...WHAT CHU MEAN...mine look like that...

Stan.

SLS · 13 November 2008, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1MAC

The seller appears to have herpes on his thumb. That would keep me from buying his watch.

Sounds like you know that from personal expirience!

Those are my fingers smart

, it's what happens when your "honey do list" takes up the entire weekend!

~Scott

springer · 13 November 2008, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevemulholland3

you cheapskate john,
I dont know how you have any watches at all!!....lol
p.s. I have a few gmts for you...what are you looking for?

Stevey boy, now you're done it.

I'm gonna drag out my virgin, untouched 1982 Tudor chrono, model 94200, and post some pics here. I paid $200 for it last year. LOL

GMT'S, well, I'm still looking for a fat lady with everything. Do you have one?

Lol-x · 13 November 2008, 10:13 AM

Looks like a bit of a Franken watch to me with the caseback & serial number issues. It's been beaten up a bit.
Given the issues, and the potential costs to get it where I wanted it e.g. new dial, bracelet, service etc. and the risk that if Rolex says the serial number has been tampered with they will not touch it, I would personally look for a watch with less issues. It might just work out to be a whole lot easier and satisfying at the end of the day.

But you decide, good luck

12 November 2008, 05:30 AM	#1
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	Feedback on this Tudor Chrono I viewed this watch this morning and would like some feedback. Dial Model # Serial # Does this printing look correct. If legit, any idea of its age. Caseback Inside the caseback Movement Thanks for your help, ~Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

12 November 2008, 08:54 AM	#4
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	Here is another pic of the serial. I left the last number out for comparison... I have seen a few "B" that look crooked but the rest of the numbers? ~Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

12 November 2008, 10:04 AM	#7
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	Here are the last two pics I have ~Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

12 November 2008, 10:49 AM	#8
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,319	My initial observation is this chrono has had the hell beaten out of it and was probably worn at Normandy, or darn well could have been judging from the condition, but since Tudor wasn't around until 1946 I guess maybe that couldn't be possible. It does look genuine though. Somebody might have tried to etch the numbers back on the case to make them more visible due to excessive wear. Lot better buys than that out there, unless he is asking $100. Could cost plenty to bring that old vintage piece back to life. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

12 November 2008, 10:57 PM	#12
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,217	PM sent. That serial # worries me. dP Attached Images __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

12 November 2008, 08:13 AM	#2
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,736	The case looks original. It also appears someone tampered with the serial number though.

12 November 2008, 09:37 AM	#5
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	sometimes they look distorted like that in photos when there are ridges,how did it look in person? other than that bad picture it looks legit.however if that serial looks that bad in person then something is very wrong.

12 November 2008, 09:39 AM	#6
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	also can you get another picture of the other side of the movement(where the rotor is covering),that is a 7750 movement and if I can see the other side it will tell me more about the quality of manufacture..

12 November 2008, 11:11 AM	#9
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	its easily worth a grand...you will put about 800 into it and still have a decent deal. I have a brand new old stock bracelet for that....hmmmm.lol

12 November 2008, 04:47 PM	#11
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	you cheapskate john, I dont know how you have any watches at all!!....lol p.s. I have a few gmts for you...what are you looking for?

12 November 2008, 11:44 PM	#13
bagel "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 605	Everything looks ok to me except the serial number which also worries me ......

13 November 2008, 01:54 AM	#14
1MAC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Leawood, Kansas Watch: Submariner 16610 Posts: 854	The seller appears to have herpes on his thumb. That would keep me from buying his watch. __________________ Time wounds all heels.

13 November 2008, 10:13 AM	#18
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,593	Looks like a bit of a Franken watch to me with the caseback & serial number issues. It's been beaten up a bit. Given the issues, and the potential costs to get it where I wanted it e.g. new dial, bracelet, service etc. and the risk that if Rolex says the serial number has been tampered with they will not touch it, I would personally look for a watch with less issues. It might just work out to be a whole lot easier and satisfying at the end of the day. But you decide, good luck __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)