The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

View Poll Results: AP Royal Oak Concept Tourbillon GMT vs RM 011-02
AP all the way 32 35.16%
RM is the one 51 56.04%
No opinion or 50/50 8 8.79%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 December 2017, 06:20 AM   #1
watchucallit
"TRF" Member
 
watchucallit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Fran
Posts: 2,218
AP Royal Concept GMT vs Richard Mille 011-02

At this moment these two might be a little bit out of reach but it is something i can start saving for during the 1st half of 2018. Until recently, I was not a big fan of RM but they have grown on me. I have always liked AP and own 3-- the ROO chrono, 15407 and RO Chromo-Pride of Italy. i do not own a tourbillon and the AP tourbillons have turned me on for some time. I am just starting to ponder perhaps a future purchase. I would even consider trading in my ROO chrono as I do not wear that one as often as the others. In terms of RM === there are a lot to choose from and I mention the RM011-02 as one I am attracted to. I prefer titanium to ceramic in both the AP and RM models I would consider.
Appreciate any comments.
Attached Images
   
watchucallit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 06:37 AM   #2
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
The AP is much more expensive but if I had the funds I would choose this over the RM. No question, easy choice.

I’ve worn both watches, the RM at the AD and AP on an AP golf day. The AP is just cool and not as recognisable as the RM.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 06:40 AM   #3
jschmidtdmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
I'd have to tell you go RM.

I owned the GMT Tourb for a awhile and ended up letting it go for another RM. The GMT tourb is fantastic, but the concept line is just too large for me and not nearly as comfortable.

I'd also add caution to the wind about buying AP's at this price point. You better love them or buy them right, because they take serious hits on resale. There isn't a huge market for these pieces.

JPS
__________________
Watches!
jschmidtdmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:52 AM   #4
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschmidtdmd View Post
I'd have to tell you go RM.

I owned the GMT Tourb for a awhile and ended up letting it go for another RM. The GMT tourb is fantastic, but the concept line is just too large for me and not nearly as comfortable.

I'd also add caution to the wind about buying AP's at this price point. You better love them or buy them right, because they take serious hits on resale. There isn't a huge market for these pieces.

JPS


John I'm interested to know what you consider to be a serious hit? In the U.K. an RM 11 is about £120k but on the secondary market (I.e watchfinder) they are listed at around £75k so I'm guessing the prior owner sold for min 15% less than that, maybe 20%.

I agree RMs are very cool but the idea that they hold their retail price is bonkers.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:59 AM   #5
jschmidtdmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by AshAP View Post
John I'm interested to know what you consider to be a serious hit? In the U.K. an RM 11 is about £120k but on the secondary market (I.e watchfinder) they are listed at around £75k so I'm guessing the prior owner sold for min 15% less than that, maybe 20%.

I agree RMs are very cool but the idea that they hold their retail price is bonkers.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ash,

I have been moving in and out of RM for the last 3 years with basically no loss. In fact, I have made money on some pieces.

It all depends on the model and the price you buy at, but RM demand right now is through the roof and supporting MSRP price.

I can't say the same for the Laptimer and GMT Concept AP's, both of which I got crushed on.

JPS
__________________
Watches!
jschmidtdmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 09:09 AM   #6
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschmidtdmd View Post
Ash,



I have been moving in and out of RM for the last 3 years with basically no loss. In fact, I have made money on some pieces.



It all depends on the model and the price you buy at, but RM demand right now is through the roof and supporting MSRP price.



I can't say the same for the Laptimer and GMT Concept AP's, both of which I got crushed on.



JPS


Well you have some cool, hard to find pieces that's for sure and maybe that's why you're doing favourably on resale. For now I'll continue to live vicariously through your incomings, maybe one day I'll have an RM incoming of my own.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 09:11 AM   #7
jschmidtdmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by AshAP View Post
Well you have some cool, hard to find pieces that's for sure and maybe that's why you're doing favourably on resale. For now I'll continue to live vicariously through your incomings, maybe one day I'll have an RM incoming of my own.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I certainly won't disagree that RM has it's own share of dogs too, you just have to know what you're buying.
__________________
Watches!
jschmidtdmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 06:47 AM   #8
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Between the two I prefer the look of the RM.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 06:57 AM   #9
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,929
Aesthetically I love both, but AP concept case is ergonomically very bad and you need large wrist and specific shape to make it look and wear right... on other side ergonomics and comfort of RM cases is out of this world...
edo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 07:04 AM   #10
ros
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Australia
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 30
While I love the AP, I've tried both on and the AP concept is simply not comfortable while the RM just feels so good on the wrist. Over and above that you get more choice with RMs
ros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:18 AM   #11
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
of those two, RM hands down. At those prices I highly doubt most would be swayed by price vs aesthetics and to me the RM wins that. Maybe a tourbillon vs tourbillon would be a more fair comparison price wise.

AP has much more desirable tourbillons than this concept though. To me at least.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:22 AM   #12
P2725TMB
2024 Pledge Member
 
P2725TMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,367
At the prices they are, neither.
P2725TMB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:29 AM   #13
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Neither for me, not my style, I'd rather have a PP PCC at over £100K.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:36 AM   #14
P2725TMB
2024 Pledge Member
 
P2725TMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,367
At that sort of value I think I'd opt for the ALS Zeitwerk Striking Time. Its definitely a possibility for me in the future - if and when I become comfortable on spending that sort of money on a timepiece.
P2725TMB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:36 AM   #15
watchucallit
"TRF" Member
 
watchucallit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Fran
Posts: 2,218
I have a small wrist but i thought the curve on the AP would make it more ergonomic and easier to wear. Hearing that is not the case..
watchucallit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 08:41 AM   #16
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchucallit View Post
I have a small wrist but i thought the curve on the AP would make it more ergonomic and easier to wear. Hearing that is not the case..
ive heard the RM is more comfortable, but ive never had a chance to try it on. Im pretty sure in london they sell them as a package deal when you buy a supercar and the botique doesn't stock them. Sort of like when you have to buy a PM rolex to get a daytona. I see them quite frequently in knightsbridge, and always attached to the wrist of someone driving a supercar.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 09:37 AM   #17
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
RM...though I don’t see either gracing my wrist any time soon!
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 10:50 AM   #18
tng11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,634
Of those two I'd pick the RM. RM is much more ergonomic, while the Concept is pretty awkward on the wrist.

If it was my money to spend though, I'd personally would put it on a Patek 5270.
tng11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 11:07 AM   #19
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
The RM in this case. Not a fan of concept. I just find them weird.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 12:05 PM   #20
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Any consideration to the 11-03 Ti?
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 03:08 PM   #21
watchucallit
"TRF" Member
 
watchucallit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Fran
Posts: 2,218
This one is on my list too.. I like it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Any consideration to the 11-03 Ti?
watchucallit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 03:09 PM   #22
watchucallit
"TRF" Member
 
watchucallit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Fran
Posts: 2,218
This thread has been helpful. I did not realize the concept was not well balanced or comfortable on the wrist
watchucallit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 05:57 PM   #23
aleeboy
"TRF" Member
 
aleeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
I would go for the RM here. Ti is good for its light weight. There are also quite a few dial options out there.

Don't like the AP one at all here. Looks very bland.
aleeboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 06:24 PM   #24
SC11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
I haven’t tried on the AP Concept in question but have tried on the Supersonnerie and will say IMO you need a fairly large wrist for it to work!

My wrist is 7.5 and carries a 44ROO well but the Super did look large and plus the caseback suited my wrist shape but got the feeling it’s one of those ones which needs a certain wrist shape!

Here’s a few pics
SC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 06:53 PM   #25
LAFLARE
"TRF" Member
 
LAFLARE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC11 View Post
I haven’t tried on the AP Concept in question but have tried on the Supersonnerie and will say IMO you need a fairly large wrist for it to work!

My wrist is 7.5 and carries a 44ROO well but the Super did look large and plus the caseback suited my wrist shape but got the feeling it’s one of those ones which needs a certain wrist shape!

Here’s a few pics
Wow that looks amazing! I can see it being a little bigger but the beauty of it is kind of taking over my eyes!
LAFLARE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2017, 06:55 PM   #26
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAFLARE View Post
Wow that looks amazing! I can see it being a little bigger but the beauty of it is kind of taking over my eyes!
that is THE concept. Its actually the only one i would get or would be remotely interested in, hypothetically speaking of course.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2017, 01:57 AM   #27
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
that is THE concept. Its actually the only one i would get or would be remotely interested in, hypothetically speaking of course.
No love for the schumi laptimer?!
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2017, 02:30 AM   #28
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
No love for the schumi laptimer?!
Its probably my second favorite but most of them have too much empty space on the dials for my taste and a busier watch looks better to me with the concepts, the schumi is better than most of them though but still not for me. The Supersonnerie has the right amount of suiff going on visually.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2017, 05:21 AM   #29
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAFLARE View Post
Wow that looks amazing! I can see it being a little bigger but the beauty of it is kind of taking over my eyes!


It’s costs more than your car too! (The RR)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2017, 05:25 AM   #30
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by AshAP View Post
It’s costs more than your car too! (The RR)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
what about the private jet? Or was that a lease?
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.