The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 January 2018, 06:07 AM   #1
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
A 400-500 Unit Tachymeter Scale is Absolutely Useless for Most Folks

For chronograph lovers, the tachymeter/stop watch function is its most attractive feature (whether strictly for looks or actual usage) and the pushers always add a nice touch to the overall appearance of the watch.

But one thing has always perplexed me and that is, whether it's on land (or water) a 400+ scale reading is somewhat useless from the standpoint of actual attainable speed.

The other evening, I saw a gentleman wearing a Seiko 6139/Pogue chronograph and on its tachymeter scale, a 50 unit reading is visible at 00:12. This made far more sense from the standpoint that even a F1 driver is rarely going to exceed 200 kph and the descending scale on the 6139 allowed for a sub 60 unit reading. For most practical applications, a 50-250 unit reading seems far more useful IMHO.

From the air, a 400+ reading is difficult to ascertain as the landmarks for establishing a visual reference point are oftentimes inaccurate and impractical. Besides, if one is going that fast, who has time to play around with the pushers?

Maybe it's the illusion of speed that makes these 400-500 scale readings more attractive than a lesser one + one can always use the 300 marker to approximate 50 (although most folks are unaware of that conversion).
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 06:52 AM   #2
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
Good point.

(Says i the dssd buyer who's chasing Red October)

Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 07:12 AM   #3
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
I think you are starting to get dangerously close to the realm of "need" vs "want"...

I wear a Deepsea every day...Do I need a watch that's waterproof to 12800 feet...

Of course not...

Do I want one...absolutely...
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 07:15 AM   #4
GinzoMatic
"TRF" Member
 
GinzoMatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Eric
Location: NOVA
Watch: DSSD D-Blue
Posts: 115
Supposedly one of Musk's newest electric cars is capable of over 400kph... you never know...
GinzoMatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 07:20 AM   #5
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by GinzoMatic View Post
Supposedly one of Musk's newest electric cars is capable of over 400kph... you never know...
Well if some guy gets pulled over by the highway patrol for doing 400+ on the freeway, he can always argue the case in traffic court with his Daytona.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 07:25 AM   #6
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,580
Generally speaking, except as backup to other more accurate and complicated device's, watches are obsolete.
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 07:27 AM   #7
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
not so bc. it also tells you units of production. i quickly figured out my old wolf winder rate by timing one rotation. it turned out to be 1400 tpd.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 08:07 AM   #8
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
not so bc. it also tells you units of production. i quickly figured out my old wolf winder rate by timing one rotation. it turned out to be 1400 tpd.
True. If a factory foreman was monitoring the production of an assembly worker who was turning out one widget every 7 seconds (500 on the tachymeter scale), he could safely assume that the same worker should be cranking out 500 of them every hour.

So with that in mind, a chronograph with a tachymeter scale of 500 might come in handy for a work supervisor based on the overall simplicity of the task itself and the maximum number of units that could be produced over a relatively short amount of time.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 09:40 AM   #9
faz
"TRF" Member
 
faz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: California
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
True. If a factory foreman was monitoring the production of an assembly worker who was turning out one widget every 7 seconds (500 on the tachymeter scale), he could safely assume that the same worker should be cranking out 500 of them every hour.

So with that in mind, a chronograph with a tachymeter scale of 500 might come in handy for a work supervisor based on the overall simplicity of the task itself and the maximum number of units that could be produced over a relatively short amount of time.
__________________
-Faz

Instagram @fazmoto
faz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2018, 01:22 PM   #10
WhiskyVerb
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 214270, Speedy Pro
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
True. If a factory foreman was monitoring the production of an assembly worker who was turning out one widget every 7 seconds (500 on the tachymeter scale), he could safely assume that the same worker should be cranking out 500 of them every hour.
Umm.... errr..... do you math much?

That's kinda funny though.
WhiskyVerb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2018, 05:14 AM   #11
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiskyVerb View Post
Umm.... errr..... do you math much?

That's kinda funny though.
OK so 1 unit every 7 seconds/500 on the tachymeter scale comes out to 8.57 which over an hour amounts to 514 units per hour (projected).

Unless one is running a 'sweatshop' it shouldn't be that big of a deal. Had I used 20 seconds/180, perhaps the concept would have been easier to comprehend.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 09:36 AM   #12
VicLeChic
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
It's potentially more useful to have a scale between 50 kph and 60 kph than one between 300 and 3600 kph for regular people, but not for racing drivers.

Where did you get that a F1 car will rarely go over 200 kph? At top speed they go well above 300 kph at every lap. Top speed record is held by Montoya in Italy at 372.6kph (231.523mph) in 2005.

You have to remember that this tool was developped to quickly know your speed on a track at any given km interval, not on average around the track (although you could use it like that too). At 360 kph you need your scale at 10 seconds. Knowing your top speed at the end of a straight is essential to optimise aerodynamic settings (rear wing and front wing load for example)

And what if you floor your Bugati Chiron in the last stretch of the Nurburgring? You could easily reach 400kph, scaled at 9 seconds per km on your tachymeter.
VicLeChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 09:49 AM   #13
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by VicLeChic View Post
Where did you get that a F1 car will rarely go over 200 kph? At top speed they go well above 300 kph at every lap. Top speed record is held by Montoya in Italy at 372.6kph (231.523mph) in 2005.
A mental lapse on my part as I often tend to get my mph's and kph's mixed-up.

Yes. 300 kph is more along the lines of F1 as 200 kph would be closer to 125 mph and a 250cc Superkart can easily exceed that speed.

The 400/500 tachymeter scale probably boils down to basic marketing strategy as the 'regular people' will always want to wear what the 'pros' wear.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 03:05 PM   #14
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
Is what you saw maybe a Pulsemeter watch where a medical professional counts 10 pulse beats and reads the scale to get beats per minute? (if ten beats takes 12 seconds, heartrate is 50 beats per minute.

Regardless, nothing says a chrono has to be used for kilometers.
zengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 03:12 PM   #15
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
The scale has to start somewhere and where it starts is probably determined more by how much space the bezel provides than for the utility of the scale at the high end.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 04:07 PM   #16
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
The scale has to start somewhere and where it starts is probably determined more by how much space the bezel provides than for the utility of the scale at the high end.
It's a design option based on the choice of scale readings.

Since the 12 hour position represents 60, going clockwise to 00:12 gives an under 60 range/reading of 50 which is probably more useful than a 400 reading @ 00:09 and/or 500 @ 00:07. As aforementioned, the Seiko 6139 chronograph opts for this particular bezel scale which allows for measuring speeds/units under 60.

While the Omega Speedmaster was the first chronograph in space and has a 500 bezel, the Seiko 6139 with its 50-250 bezel was worn on Skylab in 1973 by Col. Pogue and the model is aptly named after him. It was also one of the first (if not the first) production automatic chronographs. A cool watch of its own accord and a Seiko collectible.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2018, 04:40 PM   #17
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
As you can see, it was just a matter of rearranging the readings on the bezel dial. Sub 60 speeds are somewhat difficult to discern on a conventional 400/500 chronograph bezel unless one 'pre-visualizes' alternative readings.
Attached Images
 
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 05:16 AM   #18
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
It's a design option based on the choice of scale readings.

Since the 12 hour position represents 60, going clockwise to 00:12 gives an under 60 range/reading of 50 which is probably more useful than a 400 reading @ 00:09 and/or 500 @ 00:07. As aforementioned, the Seiko 6139 chronograph opts for this particular bezel scale which allows for measuring speeds/units under 60.

While the Omega Speedmaster was the first chronograph in space and has a 500 bezel, the Seiko 6139 with its 50-250 bezel was worn on Skylab in 1973 by Col. Pogue and the model is aptly named after him. It was also one of the first (if not the first) production automatic chronographs. A cool watch of its own accord and a Seiko collectible.
I see what mean now that you put it that way.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 01:16 PM   #19
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
It's a design option based on the choice of scale readings.

Since the 12 hour position represents 60, going clockwise to 00:12 gives an under 60 range/reading of 50 which is probably more useful than a 400 reading @ 00:09 and/or 500 @ 00:07. As aforementioned, the Seiko 6139 chronograph opts for this particular bezel scale which allows for measuring speeds/units under 60.

While the Omega Speedmaster was the first chronograph in space and has a 500 bezel, the Seiko 6139 with its 50-250 bezel was worn on Skylab in 1973 by Col. Pogue and the model is aptly named after him. It was also one of the first (if not the first) production automatic chronographs. A cool watch of its own accord and a Seiko collectible.
A spiral tachy will get you right down to 20
Attached Images
 
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 04:57 PM   #20
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
A spiral tachy will get you right down to 20
Interesting concept. Let's see now, 3 revolutions of the second hand = 20 (with the minute counter verifying the rotations).

Other than maybe making for a 'busy' dial, this works.

I was unaware that Omega and Tissot were inter-related 'back in the day'.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stainlesssteve View Post
The scale is "Units" per Hour, not Miles per Hour.
But applicable to both (including kph).
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 05:12 PM   #21
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
Interesting concept. Let's see now, 3 revolutions of the second hand = 20 (with the minute counter verifying the rotations).

Other than maybe making for a 'busy' dial, this works.

I was unaware that Omega and Tissot were inter-related 'back in the day'.
Yeah, Dan Henry makes an affordable modern version of that watch, which I picked up last year, as well as another 1930s chrono, which is even busier with three scales (Tele/Tachy/Pulse).
Attached Images
 
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 04:17 PM   #22
stainlesssteve
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: Seattle
Posts: 250
The scale is "Units" per Hour, not Miles per Hour.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------
“This whole thing is just who-knows-who, and then over here you got favoritism”... H.I. McDonough
stainlesssteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 08:51 PM   #23
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
Just as useful as a clear caseback I s'pose Adam.

I like both my models.


Wait! Did BC put up a thread about watches???
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 09:15 PM   #24
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,823
Glad to know yours reached you eventually Eddie.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2018, 04:46 PM   #25
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
I ended up with two of each.

DH sent me a second two when the first shipment went off the radar.

Both shipments arrived on the same day first shipment about 6 weeks second 6 days go figure.

Flicked one to my son for his birthday (white) and one to a friend for a wedding present (black).

Kept one if each.

All good fun at this price point.

Tell BC WE on TRF are not most folks.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2018, 05:58 PM   #26
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Tell BC WE on TRF are not most folks.
In terms of driving 400 mph/kph per hour or knowing that 300 = 50?

Rumor has it that the majority of Daytona owners rarely use the pushers.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2018, 06:08 PM   #27
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
What did he say?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2018, 12:50 PM   #28
Jdreg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 59
I don’t care
Jdreg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.