The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 February 2018, 07:42 PM   #1
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Apple watch outsold more watches than entire Swiss watch industry

Apple sold more watches than Rolex, Swatch, and the rest of the Swiss watch industry combined



Apple is one of the biggest watchmakers in the world.

How big? Based on newly available statistics, it now seems certain that Apple outsold the entire Swiss watch industry combined last quarter.

Yep. The company best known for making iPhones outsold Rolex, Omega, and even Swatch last quarter — combined.

That's according to Apple Watch sales estimates from industry researcher Canalys and IDC, and publicly released shipment statistics from the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. Canalys estimates that Apple sold 8 million Apple Watches in the last quarter of 2017.

Apple's been making watches for four years. Switzerland has been making timepieces for centuries.

http://www.businessinsider.com/warroom
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 07:48 PM   #2
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Oh come on!
How much is an iwatch compared to a Rolex????
Obviously you are going to sell more £/$200 of anything than £/$6000+ things.
This means nothing.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 08:00 PM   #3
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiss Mad! View Post
Oh come on!
How much is an iwatch compared to a Rolex????
Obviously you are going to sell more £/$200 of anything than £/$6000+ things.
This means nothing.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
Exactly. You’re talking apples and oranges. A lot more people can afford a $500 watch then a $5,000 and up timepiece. I’ll bet Timex also sold more then all the Swiss industry combined as well.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 08:03 PM   #4
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
its going to continue. Thats what happens when you sell a technology product with a finite life span of a year or two until the next one comes out to replace it. Apples and oranges.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 08:23 PM   #5
pickettt
"TRF" Member
 
pickettt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Watch: Shiny One
Posts: 5,450
And Justin Bieber outsold several real artists and musicians too.
pickettt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 11:09 PM   #6
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickettt View Post
And Justin Bieber outsold several real artists and musicians too.
perfect analogy
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 12:22 AM   #7
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Exactly. You’re talking apples and oranges. A lot more people can afford a $500 watch then a $5,000 and up timepiece. I’ll bet Timex also sold more then all the Swiss industry combined as well.
Do Orange do watches now too.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 07:50 PM   #8
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
As an aside, Casio estimates it's just sold its 100 millionth G-Shock.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 08:02 PM   #9
Kostas
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Kostas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
and that Apple Watch will be ready for the trash in a years time, how desirable will your Rolex be after a year ?


Kostas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 11:37 PM   #10
emersm
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
emersm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kostas View Post
and that Apple Watch will be ready for the trash in a years time, how desirable will your Rolex be after a year ?



Stunning!!
emersm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 12:16 AM   #11
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kostas View Post
and that Apple Watch will be ready for the trash in a years time, how desirable will your Rolex be after a year ?


Quick, chuck it in the bin...
No, hang on.... Chuck it in MY bin..

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 09:53 PM   #12
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Rolex outsold Ford full size pickups by about 300k units in 2017. I think they’re doing OK.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 10:14 PM   #13
Jtragic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: US
Posts: 3
What would be a more interesting statistic is how many of those Apple Watch users download and use a Rolex watch face on their AW.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jtragic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 10:32 PM   #14
dualcarb
"TRF" Member
 
dualcarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: HK/Malaysia
Watch: Lover
Posts: 1,223
Lets see those apple watches become vintage, collectors items. Heck...lets see them after five year. I am sure that my Rolexes will be just as desirable after 5, 10 and even 20 years from now.
dualcarb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 11:02 PM   #15
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
Ok, other than the statistic, what is your point? Many factors to consider and not really comparing comparable products.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 11:07 PM   #16
christo4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: kansas city
Posts: 171
APPLEs ...to oranges: Clever!
christo4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2018, 11:20 PM   #17
SDRider
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Julian
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Rolex 116613LB
Posts: 1,908
Toyota sold more Camrys than Rolls Royce sold all of their models combined!

You can deduce nothing from meaningless comparisons like this.
SDRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 12:44 AM   #18
bdex75
"TRF" Member
 
bdex75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
Agree with the above comments. Also consider my wife has an Apple Watch for the fitness tracking and messaging abilities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bdex75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 12:56 AM   #19
rebel_1
"TRF" Member
 
rebel_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
I use my Apple Watch for working out only. It’s good for that purpose for me. The short battery life makes me wonder why anyone would want to use it daily, but many people do.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
rebel_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 01:23 AM   #20
SDRider
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Julian
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Rolex 116613LB
Posts: 1,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel_1 View Post
I use my Apple Watch for working out only. It’s good for that purpose for me. The short battery life makes me wonder why anyone would want to use it daily, but many people do.
I already have to charge my phone and my iPad daily. I refuse to add a wrist tracking device to the routine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdex75 View Post
Agree with the above comments. Also consider my wife has an Apple Watch for the fitness tracking and messaging abilities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Mine uses her phone for fitness tracking and music when she goes out to exercise. She wears a Rolex all other times.
SDRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 12:58 AM   #21
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
Apple sold more watches than Rolex, Swatch, and the rest of the Swiss watch industry combined



Apple is one of the biggest watchmakers in the world.

How big? Based on newly available statistics, it now seems certain that Apple outsold the entire Swiss watch industry combined last quarter.

Yep. The company best known for making iPhones outsold Rolex, Omega, and even Swatch last quarter — combined.

That's according to Apple Watch sales estimates from industry researcher Canalys and IDC, and publicly released shipment statistics from the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. Canalys estimates that Apple sold 8 million Apple Watches in the last quarter of 2017.

Apple's been making watches for four years. Switzerland has been making timepieces for centuries.

http://www.businessinsider.com/warroom
Am I really supposed to be impressed with this? We are on a Rolex forum. Perhaps you logged on to the wrong site.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 01:25 AM   #22
~JJ
"TRF" Member
 
~JJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Watch: explorer
Posts: 2,292
Congrats on how excited you are, but what are you trying say with these stats? Are we to assume this is the next quartz crisis!?
~JJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 01:44 AM   #23
.brian.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Bad things happen
Watch: in Philadelphia
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Am I really supposed to be impressed with this? We are on a Rolex forum. Perhaps you logged on to the wrong site.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1William View Post
Ok, other than the statistic, what is your point? Many factors to consider and not really comparing comparable products.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~JJ View Post
Congrats on how excited you are, but what are you trying say with these stats? Are we to assume this is the next quartz crisis!?
So much hostility. The guy was simply posting an article he found online. I don't think he was trying to "impress" anyone, "make a point", or "try to say anything". Talk about shooting the messenger.
.brian. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 03:11 AM   #24
Wools
"TRF" Member
 
Wools's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by .brian. View Post
So much hostility. The guy was simply posting an article he found online. I don't think he was trying to "impress" anyone, "make a point", or "try to say anything". Talk about shooting the messenger.
Agreed. We can't live in a bubble and considering how we all love watches here, it's odd to not want to discuss all watch related news and stories, without the messenger getting shot.

My take is that it's fascinating. Most of the comments above are just talking about money, as in the AW is half the price so of course it'll sell more. Although true in that sense, we live in an age where money is easy to come by with 0% finance so an expensive watch is not out of the realms of feasibility for most people who earn an okay wage. Also, a £400 AW is expensive for most people on Earth, so it's not like a Series 1, 2 or 3 is cheap.

Also, it astonishing as a tech company at the forefront of technology combined with design has put out a watch that cost hundreds of pounds and in the space of 3 years has overtaken some of their contemporaries. That's something worth discussing and mulling over, not to be hostile to the person starting the conversation.
Wools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 03:44 AM   #25
Jtragic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: US
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by .brian. View Post
So much hostility. The guy was simply posting an article he found online. I don't think he was trying to "impress" anyone, "make a point", or "try to say anything". Talk about shooting the messenger.
this

Sent from my QTAQZ3 using Tapatalk
Jtragic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 03:54 AM   #26
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
There have been threads previously asking if 'we' as a community may be the last generation of machanical watch enthusiasts as the next one coming through seem to be more in favour of the iwatch or other smart phone based alternative.
No problem discussing the issue, I think the OP's final sentance stating that Apple have only been making watches for 4 years compared to Switzerland's centuries was the reason the forum (including myself) got so defensive.
You are correct though, we shouldn't shoot the messenger, but maybe if the messanger could have phrased it slightly differently so it didn't seem so negative towards the Swiss watch industry.



Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 04:09 AM   #27
.brian.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Bad things happen
Watch: in Philadelphia
Posts: 495
Ahhh, I see where the confusion lies. The text in the original post was not that of the poster. He simply "copy and paste'd" the article. The link in the OP does not take you directly to the article he is referencing, however, so I can see how many would think that the words in his post were in fact his.

Here is a link to the story he quoted.
http://www.businessinsider.com/apple...in-2017-2018-2
.brian. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 04:16 AM   #28
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Reading the article it does say that "Apple does not give out Apple Watch sales data".

Still, last Q of 2017 means a lot of Christmas gifts that are now in the bottom of the dresser or junk drawer.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 04:30 AM   #29
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
WOW, Tough crowd.. so, you don't want people to even post articles about whats happening in the world in Watch industry?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Am I really supposed to be impressed with this? We are on a Rolex forum. Perhaps you logged on to the wrong site.
Really?? You've been here a member less than a year and probably I own more Rolex than you and you commenting if I logged onto a wrong site for sharing an article? You are in wrong sub-forum dude - this is an OPEN DISCUSSION subforum and not Rolex General Discussion subforum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiss Mad! View Post
No problem discussing the issue, I think the OP's final sentance stating that Apple have only been making watches for 4 years compared to Switzerland's centuries was the reason the forum (including myself) got so defensive.
You are correct though, we shouldn't shoot the messenger, but maybe if the messanger could have phrased it slightly differently so it didn't seem so negative towards the Swiss watch industry.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
FYI - that final sentence including everything in the post is from the article and there's not a single sentence of mine anywhere. So, you want me to sugarcoat the article before posting on here?




Quote:
Originally Posted by .brian. View Post
Ahhh, I see where the confusion lies. The text in the original post was not that of the poster. He simply "copy and paste'd" the article. The link in the OP does not take you directly to the article he is referencing, however, so I can see how many would think that the words in his post were in fact his.

Here is a link to the story he quoted.
http://www.businessinsider.com/apple...in-2017-2018-2
Thanks, I guess even posting the link in my article but it got cut and became half link.
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2018, 04:14 AM   #30
newbee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Real Name: Ash
Location: Far and away
Watch: Rolex day date
Posts: 251
It’ll make more sense if we compare the turnover than number of sales. And honestly I never liked apple watches personally. I totally love my Mac but Apple watches are different story.
newbee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.