Rolex Deepsea D-Blue: 116660 or 126660?

[FinWatch]

First of all:
Thank You all for sharing in this amazing community! I have learned a lot and reading&posting things here helps a lot to make Rolex-choices that suits me the best.
I am new here and last summer 2017 I bought my first Rolex. At the end of this year I might have 6-7 Rolex -collection... It is hard for me to decide if the watch is right for me. When I have been using the watch for a while, then I truly know if it is a keeper or not. This might mean that at some point I just have to sell the watch that I have bought...

One of watches that I am planning to catch, is Deepsea D-Blue.

What is your opinion:
Should I buy the older version, discontinued 116660, or the latest 126660?

As I understood, the discontinued model would increase better in value over the years to come. But the latest version is better designed and has that new movement inside.

I know that for the model 126660 I am third in the line, so I am supposed to get the latest D-Blue by the end of 2018.

Discontinued model I could get right away for example from Chrono24, but I should pay approx. 1k+ (in euros) over the MRSP.

What to do, what would you do?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[seadweller43]

I would definitely wait for the 126660 if I were you. being third in the queue means you are going to get it fast. the new version will hold its value as much as the old one, if not better. they are virtually the same. but with wider bracelet and new movement, the new one should wear more comfortable and not so top heavy. also you dont need to pay a premium to get it like the old version.

[travisb]

Can't go wrong either way. It's a special watch. I owned the original and had no complaints. The new version has some subtle tweaks and in the end I chose the 126660. The bracelet balances and makes the watch more proportional. The other differences are hard to spot unless you are in the know. Slightly longer minute hand, crown at 6 o'clock, new movement, redone lugs etc.Don't look back either way. Can't miss in my opinion.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by travisb

Can't go wrong either way. It's a special watch. I owned the original and had no complaints. The new version has some subtle tweaks and in the end I chose the 126660. The bracelet balances and makes the watch more proportional. The other differences are hard to spot unless you are in the know. Slightly longer minute hand, crown at 6 o'clock, new movement, redone lugs etc.Don't look back either way. Can't miss in my opinion.

Take it from someone who knows

[meganfox17]

Originally Posted by FinWatch

At some point I just have to sell the watch that I have bought..Should I buy the older version, discontinued 116660, or the latest 126600

None of the above.
Have you tried on the D Blue or SD43 ? I grew up wearing Seiko Divers , Sinn, Tags and Omega PO so hefty watches don't bother me.
However if you buy either versions,I predict you'll have problems with the size and thickness so eventually flipping the D-Blue for the SD43 OR keeping the D Blue 126660 in mint condition and selling it off later for a small profit

[FinWatch]

Originally Posted by meganfox17

None of the above.
Have you tried on the D Blue or SD43 ? I grew up wearing Seiko Divers , Sinn, Tags and Omega PO so hefty watches don't bother me.
However if you buy either versions,I predict you'll have problems with the size and thickness so eventually flipping the D-Blue for the SD43 OR keeping the D Blue 126660 in mint condition and selling it off later for a small profit

Yeah; My SD43 is just great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bt430]

Originally Posted by FinWatch

Yeah; My SD43 is just great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That may be a really bad angle on that picture but it doesn't look like you have enough wrist for that SD43. If that's actually the case, a DeepSea might not be the way for you to go.

[FinWatch]

Originally Posted by bt430

That may be a really bad angle on that picture but it doesn't look like you have enough wrist for that SD43. If that's actually the case, a DeepSea might not be the way for you to go.

Yeah, it is not a good picture—I have been enjoying this SD43 a lot! I actually tested Deepsea D-Blue once: it is big, but it is not a problem to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bt430]

Originally Posted by FinWatch

Yeah, it is not a good picture—I have been enjoying this SD43 a lot! I actually tested Deepsea D-Blue once: it is big, but it is not a problem to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great to hear! Then you'll love it. Mine has completely dominated the rotation!

[watchmework]

If it were me I’d go for the 126660 and wait, you’re only third in line and the upgrades (in my opinion at least) are worth it.

[herts9]

My daily is a black 116660. 7.25 wrist. Tried Subs and Explorers but they left me feeling like I had zero wrist presence. The changes are so subtle to me, it's apples and oranges.

My advice, get the one you get the best deal on

[Nairn1980]

116660 jc imo

[FinWatch]

Thank you all for your comments so far!
At the moment, according to your views, 126660 is winning...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[hitman23]

if you are buying to wear it, then the latest is the greatest.

if you are buying with the hope of making a buck, then buy the 1st generation.

[Rashid.bk]

I have the same choice to make. I'm not a collector, I'm not necessarily overly concerned with investment potential. I'm more concerned about my enjoyment and possible improvements. In this context I feel it's like buying a newer car that has some improvements over the previous year. These improvements will help me enjoy it more. So I chose the 126660.

However, if I already owned a D-Blue 116660 then I'd be just as happy and wouldn't trade up.

[Kiddodoc]

Tough decision! Have the current JC Deepsea and love it but may add the newer version. I do have the SD43 and the wider bracelet is notable. I will likely add the new JC as I like the longer power reserve my SD43 provides.

[antbkny]

I’d like to see the new one in person but I can’t image it looking better or being more comfortable than the original. You can’t go wrong with either!

[FinWatch]

Originally Posted by antbkny

I’d like to see the new one in person but I can’t image it looking better or being more comfortable than the original. You can’t go wrong with either!

Wow! Looks great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ccaballero]

Originally Posted by FinWatch

Wow! Looks great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Anthony has the perfect wrist for the Dblue.

[antbkny]

Originally Posted by FinWatch

Wow! Looks great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by ccaballero

Anthony has the perfect wrist for the Dblue.

Thanks guys. Having a big flat wrist, I could fit a grand father clock on it nicely

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by kiddodoc

Tough decision! Have the current JC Deepsea and love it but may add the newer version. I do have the SD43 and the wider bracelet is notable. I will likely add the new JC as I like the longer power reserve my SD43 provides.

This rationale makes perfect sense.

If one is wearing the SD43 as well as a 116660 and comes to prefer the feel of the new watch and the bracelet over the old, then it would be logical to migrate to the newer versions within a collection with the wider bracelet/clasp for ease of adaptability between the models.

[kauffee]

I’d probably get the new one for the movement and the bracelet. There’s this myth on the forums that anytime Rolex discontinues anything, it will automatically become a hot collectors item and become more valuable. That’s just not true.

[FinWatch]

Originally Posted by kauffee

I’d probably get the new one for the movement and the bracelet. There’s this myth on the forums that anytime Rolex discontinues anything, it will automatically become a hot collectors item and become more valuable. That’s just not true.

Well said. It truly isn’t that black and white... even though couple of watch vloggers has said in their reviews that this Cameron-watch might well be valuable collectible later on... who knows...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ccaballero]

Originally Posted by FinWatch

Well said. It truly isn’t that black and white... even though couple of watch vloggers has said in their reviews that this Cameron-watch might well be valuable collectible later on... who knows...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Dblue is such a unique watch in Rolex catalog. I think the old and new are both spectacular. It is watch meant to be worn. The only question is whether your wrist gets a better fit with new vs old.

As to black Deepsea, Rolex should’ve discontinued as SD43 is everything the black and white Deepsea could’ve and should’ve been.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by ccaballero

The Dblue is such a unique watch in Rolex catalog. I think the old and new are both spectacular. It is watch meant to be worn. The only question is whether your wrist gets a better fit with new vs old.

As to black Deepsea, Rolex should’ve discontinued as SD43 is everything the black and white Deepsea could’ve and should’ve been.

You're right about the difference between the fit of the old and new versions.
Unless your wrist size can pull the new one off I suspect it will wear somewhat larger than the old.

As far as the SD43 being everything the DSSD should have been.
I have to disagree completely unless one is referring to perceptions around wearability. At the end of the day it's all dependant upon wrist size and shape and how one prefers to wear their watch in terms of fit.
I have worn the DSSD every day now for nearly 7 years except for when i'm asleep and it's perfect for me.
The SD43 is not for me for the following reasons.
Firstly, the case-back protrudes a little more than the DSSD.
Secondly, the lugs don't have as much drop at the tips to wrap around my wrist as well as the DSSD.
Thirdly, whilst the bracelet is wider and seemingly more in proportion to the watch head and making the width of the lugs more in proportion and in keeping with the 5 digit models. All is well until one views the watch from the underside to reveal the bloated width of the clasp.
If one is used to the older Rolex watches(4 and 5 digit models) and the fit/feel of them on the wrist with a narrower clasp, the new one can feel utterly foreign and more in line with a totally different brand with Omega and Seiko being two that come to mind.

In terms of the technicalities and capabilities and assuming one actually appreciates/values that sort of thing.
The SD43 would be a useless imploded blob of junk at the rated depth of the DSSD. So in that regard it could never ever be anything the DSSD actually is.

[ccaballero]

Originally Posted by Dirt

You're right about the difference between the fit of the old and new versions.
Unless your wrist size can pull the new one off I suspect it will wear somewhat larger than the old.

As far as the SD43 being everything the DSSD should have been.
I have to disagree completely unless one is referring to perceptions around wearability. At the end of the day it's all dependant upon wrist size and shape and how one prefers to wear their watch in terms of fit.
I have worn the DSSD every day now for nearly 7 years except for when i'm asleep and it's perfect for me.
The SD43 is not for me for the following reasons.
Firstly, the case-back protrudes a little more than the DSSD.
Secondly, the lugs don't have as much drop at the tips to wrap around my wrist as well as the DSSD.
Thirdly, whilst the bracelet is wider and seemingly more in proportion to the watch head and making the width of the lugs more in proportion and in keeping with the 5 digit models. All is well until one views the watch from the underside to reveal the bloated width of the clasp.
If one is used to the older Rolex watches(4 and 5 digit models) and the fit/feel of them on the wrist with a narrower clasp, the new one can feel utterly foreign and more in line with a totally different brand with Omega and Seiko being two that come to mind.

In terms of the technicalities and capabilities and assuming one actually appreciates/values that sort of thing.
The SD43 would be a useless imploded blob of junk at the rated depth of the DSSD. So in that regard it could never ever be anything the DSSD actually is.

Tell us how you really feel about the SD43.

[Saoirse32]

Originally Posted by Dirt

You're right about the difference between the fit of the old and new versions.
Unless your wrist size can pull the new one off I suspect it will wear somewhat larger than the old.

As far as the SD43 being everything the DSSD should have been.
I have to disagree completely unless one is referring to perceptions around wearability. At the end of the day it's all dependant upon wrist size and shape and how one prefers to wear their watch in terms of fit.
I have worn the DSSD every day now for nearly 7 years except for when i'm asleep and it's perfect for me.
The SD43 is not for me for the following reasons.
Firstly, the case-back protrudes a little more than the DSSD.
Secondly, the lugs don't have as much drop at the tips to wrap around my wrist as well as the DSSD.
Thirdly, whilst the bracelet is wider and seemingly more in proportion to the watch head and making the width of the lugs more in proportion and in keeping with the 5 digit models. All is well until one views the watch from the underside to reveal the bloated width of the clasp.
If one is used to the older Rolex watches(4 and 5 digit models) and the fit/feel of them on the wrist with a narrower clasp, the new one can feel utterly foreign and more in line with a totally different brand with Omega and Seiko being two that come to mind.

In terms of the technicalities and capabilities and assuming one actually appreciates/values that sort of thing.
The SD43 would be a useless imploded blob of junk at the rated depth of the DSSD. So in that regard it could never ever be anything the DSSD actually is.

Agreed! But, if I were rich, I’d own the SD43 too. It’s stiil pretty sweet!

[antbkny]

Originally Posted by kauffee

I’d probably get the new one for the movement and the bracelet. There’s this myth on the forums that anytime Rolex discontinues anything, it will automatically become a hot collectors item and become more valuable. That’s just not true.

i disagree somewhat because we can’t predict the future. However history does repeat itself. Either way,the now is what’s important and whatever makes you happy is the right move!

[FinWatch]

Originally Posted by antbkny

i disagree somewhat because we can’t predict the future. However history does repeat itself. Either way,the now is what’s important and whatever makes you happy is the right move!

Well said!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kauffee]

Originally Posted by antbkny

i disagree somewhat because we can’t predict the future. However history does repeat itself. Either way,the now is what’s important and whatever makes you happy is the right move!

Right, my point was not to take it as a given that gen 1 will be a collectible and go up disproportionally in value. It may, of course, but it may not.