The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 July 2018, 01:51 PM   #1
Romeojk
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Romeojk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,973
Why men wear watches that don’t tell time

I guess those people (in the article) don’t keep them working and don’t frequent TRF
https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-men...ime-1531155881

ON TREND
Why Men Are Wearing Watches That Don’t Tell Time
What’s the point of wearing a watch when you’ve got a phone glued to your palm? For some, it’s all in the looks
THOUGH HE FREQUENTLY WORE a Cartier Tank watch, Andy Warhol didn’t use it to keep the time. “I wear a Tank because it’s the watch to wear,” Mr. Warhol once said, according to a September 2017 article in the New York Times. He would never even wind his wristwatch—it was for looks, not to look at.
Today, it seems, style-conscious men are adopting the Pop artist’s perspective, treating their increasingly redundant wristwatches more like jewelry than a tool—a move that traditionalists might instinctively want to ridicule. Judson Lee, 38, a director at an advertising agency in Fayetteville, Ark., owns three watches but almost never sets them. All of his timepieces are mechanical and therefore require winding for an accurate read, unlike quartz watches which can dependably rely on a battery. He thinks of each watch as “an object of style,” an accessory that rounds out an outfit as a bracelet would. He wasn’t always indifferent to conventional timekeeping: “Pre-iPhone I certainly set them, kept them at the correct time and date, all that jazz,” he said. These days, when he wants to check the hour of day, he simply takes out his iPhone.

We are as much about leisure
as we are about business.

With smartphones practically glued to our palms at all times and smartwatches muscling in, traditional timepieces are just no longer as vital as they once were in any practical sense. Fears among watch execs that the Apple Watch, introduced in 2015, would snatch up wrist real estate were confirmed in the fourth quarter of 2017 when industry researcher Canalys and IDC reported that Apple sold more watches than the entire Swiss watch industry combined. Ramsey Hidmi, 28, who works in asset management in Boston, said that few people he knows wear a watch at all, “and if they do, it’s an Apple Watch.” An outlier among them, Mr. Hidmi straps on a 12-year-old Rolex that he inherited from his father. Not that he ever bothers to set the time. “It’s an heirloom piece,” said Mr. Hidmi.
It’s not just casual wearers who rationalize strapping on comatose tickers, though. “I rely on my phone to tell me the time and I’m a mechanical watch collector,” said James Lamdin, the founder of Analog/Shift, a vintage watch retailer in New York City. With an extensive collection at his disposal, Mr. Lamdin sometimes switches watches multiple times a day, and he doesn’t pause to set each one. It’s more accurate just to check his phone. “Any digital time-keeping device, be it a phone or a G-Shock is going to keep much better time than any mechanical watch, no matter how high-grade,” he said, alluding to the fact that mechanical watches tend to speed up or slow down as the day goes on. “One does not wear a vintage watch to tell the time. You wear a vintage watch to experience the passage of time,” declared Mr. Lamdin, obliquely referring to an older watch’s potential to accrue value over the years.
Mr. Lamdin said he’s seen more “fashion forward” types gravitating towards that aged look of a vintage mechanical watch, with little interest in the ticking cogs beneath the glass. “It tends to be some of the super-fashiony maven people who are all about style,” he said of men who go that route, adding that he’s also seen collectors who will buy a nonfunctioning watch and wear it without having it properly serviced simply because they like it as a “statement piece.”
To most sane humans, this might seem an absurd way to think about a watch, especially when mechanical timepieces can cost as much as a mid-tier BMW sedan. Like wearing glasses to appear bookish when you’re perfectly sighted, there is something pretentious about strapping on an idle timepiece you don’t need. It’s pure flash, telegraphing status but just a pose.
Yet in all fairness, most men’s accessories don’t serve a purpose beyond looks. Ties and pocket squares are worn because they look pretty and add polish and, yes, status. If an iPhone or a computer clock can do a better job than a watch, then perhaps it’s entirely defensible to focus on the watch’s traditional second duty as a pure accessory. “At this stage [a watch] is really like a nice pair of socks, because it brings the look together and makes a man look more finished,” said Basha Singh, the director of made-to-measure and VIP styling at Ralph Lauren’s flagship location in New York. Each morning, Mr. Singh straps on one of his handful of watches with a suit and tie for work, but more often than not, that watch is only right twice a day.

Last edited by Romeojk; 14 July 2018 at 02:00 PM.. Reason: The link wants you to sign up to WSJ so here’s the article...
Romeojk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2018, 01:52 PM   #2
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
I need to pay to read the article.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2018, 01:56 PM   #3
Romeojk
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Romeojk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
I need to pay to read the article.


Wow, that’s weird, I originally saw it in my News feed on my iPhone
Romeojk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2018, 04:11 PM   #4
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Phone or no phone, ubiquitous clocks or no ubiquitous clocks, I want the the device on my wrist to tell the correct time to within about a minute.

Besides being fascinated with watches and finding them to be a source of enjoyment, their main function for me is to have the time in a very convenient location at all times.

I'm glad that there are clocks everywhere including on my phone, my computer, microwave, walls, dashboard, but none of those are substitutes for my ever present wrist.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2018, 06:14 PM   #5
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
Phone or no phone, ubiquitous clocks or no ubiquitous clocks, I want the the device on my wrist to tell the correct time to within about a minute.

Besides being fascinated with watches and finding them to be a source of enjoyment, their main function for me is to have the time in a very convenient location at all times.

I'm glad that there are clocks everywhere including on my phone, my computer, microwave, walls, dashboard, but none of those are substitutes for my ever present wrist.
Yep When I’m not wearing my watch I find myself looking at my empty wrist by habbit more then once.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 02:47 AM   #6
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
Phone or no phone, ubiquitous clocks or no ubiquitous clocks, I want the the device on my wrist to tell the correct time to within about a minute.

Besides being fascinated with watches and finding them to be a source of enjoyment, their main function for me is to have the time in a very convenient location at all times.

I'm glad that there are clocks everywhere including on my phone, my computer, microwave, walls, dashboard, but none of those are substitutes for my ever present wrist.
This
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 02:51 AM   #7
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
Comes across as vain IMO. Better to have both aesthetic and function
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:53 AM   #8
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Ferry View Post
Comes across as vain IMO. Better to have both aesthetic and function
Yep - functional aesthetics all the way
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2018, 09:49 PM   #9
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
I can't think of anything that I have ever owned that was/is just for looks including my haircut. Sounds a bit shallow.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 11:08 AM   #10
CRM114
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock View Post
I can't think of anything that I have ever owned that was/is just for looks including my haircut. Sounds a bit shallow.
You never owned a tie? Ever?
CRM114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 01:39 AM   #11
BabyHuey
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: earth
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romeojk View Post
THOUGH HE FREQUENTLY WORE a Cartier Tank watch, Andy Warhol didn’t use it to keep the time. “I wear a Tank because it’s the watch to wear,” Mr. Warhol once said, according to a September 2017 article in the New York Times. He would never even wind his wristwatch—it was for looks, not to look at.
My first post and in response to the OP. Some people choose to wear their watches as a fashion statement or accessory. Mr. Warhol was an avant-garde artist so perhaps one must allow for a certain degree of eccentricity and impracticality in these cases.

On the other hand and though their timepieces are probably set to the current time, many women are electing to wear men's Rolexes as a personal fashion statement as well.
BabyHuey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 02:38 AM   #12
bdex75
"TRF" Member
 
bdex75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
Now I’m not a stickler for my watches being COSC but it must be close.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bdex75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 10:21 AM   #13
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,074
It's a tool first and must be functional as such.
Mass appeal or aesthetic jewelry is second.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 July 2018, 11:43 AM   #14
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
Actually the tie served a very definite function. It kept me employed because it was required business attire. As soon as I got a job where it wasn't, I stopped wearing them.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 July 2018, 11:48 AM   #15
codecow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Louis
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: PP 5131R
Posts: 5,197
Sometimes I don’t set mine especially if it’s a complicated piece. I have a cell phone in my pocket that is more accurate and more complicated.
codecow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 July 2018, 11:54 AM   #16
Rockrolex
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Rockrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by codecow View Post
Sometimes I don’t set mine especially if it’s a complicated piece. I have a cell phone in my pocket that is more accurate and more complicated.
My complicated pieces are kept on winders. I wear a mechanical watch because it tells me the time. I sometimes forget my phone, but I never forget my wristwatch because it is always strapped to my wrist.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular.

Tosser Cabinet Member

Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Rockrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.