The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 October 2018, 07:13 AM   #1
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Wimbledon dial, fad?

I’m gonna get one from davidsw tonight regardless but I wanted to start the convo, do y’all think the Wimbledon dial is a fad or timeless

steve
dimag333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 07:24 AM   #2
DahMan
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 635
I wouldn’t call it a fad, but I did find it to be a little too busy. I traded David SW last Saturday, for a Fluted Oyster Blue stick, and my TT Jub slate green Roman.
I had an issue with TT, Jub, and dial face. The dial just didn’t seem concentric, I didn’t like the gaps, and couldn’t make a solid call on what minute I was working on.also no Lume.
David SW, was a pleasure to deal with...
DahMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 07:30 AM   #3
Rocket launcher
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: England
Posts: 989
It's a masterpiece..and framed in a 2 tone rose gold jubilee bracelet and flutted bezel it's a work of art..
That's my dream watch...
Rocket launcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 07:41 AM   #4
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
I was originally gong for the silver dial at first but decided not to play it safe, although I love the silver dial when this version came out this year in SS I was all in. I guess this is really not the Wimbledon dial because it's not a TT with yellow or rose gold hands? But fad? I don't think so..

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 08:32 AM   #5
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikrnic View Post
I was originally gong for the silver dial at first but decided not to play it safe, although I love the silver dial when this version came out this year in SS I was all in. I guess this is really not the Wimbledon dial because it's not a TT with yellow or rose gold hands? But fad? I don't think so..

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
How does this feel next to your 114060, I sold mine last year and have been in holding pattern, I do like the smooth with oyster

steve
dimag333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 09:40 AM   #6
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
It doesn't really feel smaller but it is lighter and more comfortable around the wrist and clasp. Somewhat noticeable. I also prefer the smooth and oyster. It seems more sporty and they shine well together. If you love and half to have lume this may not be the one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimag333 View Post
How does this feel next to your 114060, I sold mine last year and have been in holding pattern, I do like the smooth with oyster

steve
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 06:03 PM   #7
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikrnic View Post


I think the missing Arabic on the "9" looks off



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 07:45 AM   #8
lenfried29
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Far Far Away
Watch: tick-tock
Posts: 1,206
I like it.
lenfried29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 08:28 AM   #9
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
This dial has been around for a while, starting with the DJ2 when it was first released, about 2009 or so. So, I don't think it's a fad. A niche following and market, maybe, but not a fad.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 08:31 AM   #10
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
I should say I’m thinkng fluted, Jub, not yellow or rose, I am a bit concerned on no lume

steve
dimag333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 08:32 AM   #11
justdate
"TRF" Member
 
justdate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: RJ
Location: UK Coast
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex
Posts: 1,359
I had a TT DJ2 with this dial about 6 years ago! It looked good then and still does today so not sure it’s a fad, there’s certainly not excessive hype it’s a really nice dial.
justdate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 08:38 AM   #12
Vaxe
"TRF" Member
 
Vaxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,122
Cool dial, be better with lume though
Vaxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 08:44 AM   #13
Hollie_Rollie
2024 Pledge Member
 
Hollie_Rollie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: SD43
Posts: 3,353
Wimbledon dial, fad?

I think it looks amazing with a fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hollie_Rollie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 04:35 PM   #14
mmmmp
"TRF" Member
 
mmmmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollie_Rollie View Post
I think it looks amazing with a fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It sure does. For the record, I owned several Rolex watches over the last 25 years and without a doubt this is my favorite. Yes, no lume on the dial except for that big stick at 9: but the hand glow with chromalight so reading the time is easy.

Mark

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
mmmmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 08:49 AM   #15
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Today was the first time I tried a jub on seriously considering it, I felt the claps broke it up a bit but I guess you get used to it?


steve
dimag333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 09:07 AM   #16
zakattack62
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London Ontario Ca
Posts: 216
I just traded my wimbledon dial datejust. I really liked the look of it but biggest issue, and it's been said many times in this thread, NO LUME.
zakattack62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 09:43 AM   #17
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
It’s nice
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 09:46 AM   #18
herts9
"TRF" Member
 
herts9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,034
If I had a DJ, it'd be this one
herts9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 10:08 AM   #19
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
Its been around for a long time already.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 12:33 PM   #20
Largoshark
"TRF" Member
 
Largoshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Mike
Location: New England
Posts: 1,754
Does Rolex make fad watches?
Largoshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 01:05 PM   #21
Tampashooter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: In the present
Posts: 846
That awful, random 9 stick is a non starter. The dial strikes me as a lazy effort.
Tampashooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 01:26 PM   #22
05carbondrz
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tampashooter View Post
That awful, random 9 stick is a non starter. The dial strikes me as a lazy effort.
Agreed,WTF where they thinking?
05carbondrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 01:33 PM   #23
dimag333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tampashooter View Post
That awful, random 9 stick is a non starter. The dial strikes me as a lazy effort.
after having owned a 114060 which is literally the exact opposite dial wise I am starting to lean that way!

steve
dimag333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2018, 02:42 AM   #24
erne75
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: FL
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tampashooter View Post
That awful, random 9 stick is a non starter. The dial strikes me as a lazy effort.
Yep, WTF?!?!?
erne75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2018, 04:21 AM   #25
mtasquared
"TRF" Member
 
mtasquared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: usa
Watch: 1989 Submariner
Posts: 166
I never once thought of this watch as polarizing, but I guess it is. Some people are even willing to be blowhards about it. lol. We're not going to change each others minds. I for one think asymmetry keeps things interesting. Any Rolex with a date complication is already asymmetrical.
__________________
Stay thirsty, my friends.
mtasquared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 02:18 PM   #26
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Did Rolex run out of Roman numeral 9s?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 02:54 PM   #27
Ichiran
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ichiran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Near beach
Watch: PB1967
Posts: 8,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNIC View Post
Did Rolex run out of Roman numeral 9s?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The white index marker at 9 is used to balance the white date wheel at 3.

I thought this arrangement works very well, maybe it's just me.
Ichiran is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2018, 01:20 AM   #28
Enoch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNIC View Post
Did Rolex run out of Roman numeral 9s?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s not even proper Roman numerals in my book....4 should be IV not IIII
Enoch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2018, 01:38 AM   #29
DavidUK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Leicestershire UK
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch View Post
It’s not even proper Roman numerals in my book....4 should be IV not IIII
IIII is the "watchmaker's 4" - do a Google.
DavidUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2018, 03:01 PM   #30
Likestheshiny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
I think there's a middle ground between "fad" and "timeless" -- "small but dedicated following," perhaps?

It's not to my tastes, personally, but this thread already shows that some folks love it.
Likestheshiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.