The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 October 2018, 08:42 AM   #1
drgoro
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 816
D-blue old vs new

For the guys that have this amazing reference; is there room in a collection for both?
drgoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 08:52 AM   #2
Kiddodoc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kiddodoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: Texas
Watch: 15 and counting!
Posts: 3,531
Yes, if you love the reference, it is ok to have multiple of the same. Get what you want and don't worry about what we think!
Kiddodoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 08:59 AM   #3
drgoro
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 816
The more potted question is there a big enough difference in daily wearability.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiddodoc View Post
Yes, if you love the reference, it is ok to have multiple of the same. Get what you want and don't worry about what we think!
drgoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 09:20 AM   #4
Kiddodoc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kiddodoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: Texas
Watch: 15 and counting!
Posts: 3,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoro View Post
The more potted question is there a big enough difference in daily wearability.
I don't have both but have the 116660 DSSD Blue and the SD43. The new bracelet is definitely wider and seems to make the watch look bigger overall. The original bracelet on the 116610 is thinner but not too thin. I think the difference will be small so if you are looking for a big difference, you won't find it. Some feel the older bracelet was too small. Also the lugs/bracelet area is flush now whereas the 116660 protrudes a bit.
Kiddodoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 08:54 AM   #5
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
I really don’t believe so. They’re so similar.
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 08:38 PM   #6
roosvelt
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: achille
Location: Grosse Pointe Mi.
Watch: 16613 serti 18078
Posts: 446
I think owning 2 is not needed. I bought the old style DSblue I like the bigger lugs and the thinner bracelet. I figured Rolex first design was all about form following function. The second ref. changed because what buyers wanted. Power reserve means nothing to me, plus I want the old work horse 3135 .
roosvelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 08:42 PM   #7
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
I think that it is duplication and there are a lot of other watches that would be in my lineup before I duplicated a watch.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 11:43 PM   #8
GsurgBM
"TRF" Member
 
GsurgBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 3,759
Nah. Too similar. And if you wore the new one you probably would r wear the older one much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai
GsurgBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 11:53 PM   #9
lenfried29
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Far Far Away
Watch: tick-tock
Posts: 1,206
I would't have two similar watches in my collection unless one is a dealer or selling the watches for profit. It's not a mail stamp.
lenfried29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 12:55 AM   #10
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
Too similar for me.
I sold my 116660 when I got the 126660.
travisb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 01:11 AM   #11
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
Would be too similar for me.
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 01:16 AM   #12
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
I wouldn’t own both. I own the 116660 and, much as it pains me to say it, prefer the 126660 - but not enough to go through the hassle of an upgrade
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 02:42 AM   #13
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
Too close foe me to own both, maybe if it were like a 5 vs 6 digit I would. or DSSD vs SD43.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 12:56 PM   #14
fixinbones
"TRF" Member
 
fixinbones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Jay
Location: New York
Watch: 118206
Posts: 911
No way
__________________
126719 BLRO meteorite
126660 D-blue
118206 Day Date
fixinbones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 01:15 PM   #15
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
I have the MK I and was offered the MK II by my AD but turned it fine as I live mine so much!
I wouldn’t have both! Waaaaaaaay too similar
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 04:33 PM   #16
Rolex.c6
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex.c6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Netherlands/Spain
Watch: Sea-Dweller 116600
Posts: 1,030
For me I see no reason why. The watches are too much alike. Honestly can not see a reason why to keep a 116660 if I could get a 126660. Maybe only if the first one has sentimental value/memories. I think it's different from someone owning a 5 and 6 digit sub or Seadweller for instance. Those are 'totally different' watches. The only differences (I can tell at least) for the new DSSD are the wider bracelet, the new 32 movement and the tiny crown at 6 on the dial.
__________________
Rolex.c6
Sea-Dweller 4000 SD4K
Ref. 116600
Rolex.c6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 04:40 PM   #17
Manu74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Mark
Location: Europe
Watch: BLRO | LV | SkyD
Posts: 1,404
No, they are too similar.
Manu74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 05:58 PM   #18
VicLeChic
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
the new one would cannibalize the old one
VicLeChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 06:27 PM   #19
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoro View Post
For the guys that have this amazing reference; is there room in a collection for both?
i think the real question is do you like it enough to justify two of the same watch vs having two different watches.

I always want way more watches than i have, so i would get something else.

Its so close to being the same and the bracelet isnt different enough to me.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.