The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 December 2018, 01:40 AM   #1
dreyep
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: UK
Watch: 114270, 16570
Posts: 349
Looks better in photos

How often do we hear that a watch looks so much better in reality than in photos? The new Air King, the Milgauss blue, the Exp II polar 42. In the last week I have read this about all of these on here.

But maybe there's a reference that actually disappoints in reality, while looking absolutely fabulous in photos.

Any candidates?
dreyep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2018, 01:45 AM   #2
xspect
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: louisiana
Posts: 269
Any watch that I can’t affird


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
xspect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2018, 01:46 AM   #3
jeffnnj
"TRF" Member
 
jeffnnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 763
Yup. The Daytona. Looks much smaller in person which is one of the main reasons I’ve never pulled the trigger. Well that and lack of a date.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jeffnnj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 06:28 AM   #4
Dnf888
"TRF" Member
 
Dnf888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffnnj View Post
Yup. The Daytona. Looks much smaller in person which is one of the main reasons I’ve never pulled the trigger. Well that and lack of a date.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Totally agree. Looks amazing in all the incoming pictures, but the only Rolex I would classify as looking disgusting on my wrist, which is why my wife lucked out. It looks great on her wrist. However, she is also annoyed about the lack of a date.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Dnf888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 10:11 AM   #5
vinny84
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffnnj View Post
Yup. The Daytona. Looks much smaller in person which is one of the main reasons I’ve never pulled the trigger. Well that and lack of a date.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s funny, I just left an AD and saw a RG Daytona on OF. First thought that popped in my mind was how small it is in person. Not sure if I would consider anymore, but then again it wasn’t on my wrist either
vinny84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 12:05 PM   #6
mistercoach32
"TRF" Member
 
mistercoach32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffnnj View Post
Yup. The Daytona. Looks much smaller in person which is one of the main reasons I’ve never pulled the trigger. Well that and lack of a date.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I second this 100%.
mistercoach32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 12:08 PM   #7
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffnnj View Post
Yup. The Daytona. Looks much smaller in person which is one of the main reasons I’ve never pulled the trigger. Well that and lack of a date.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
100% agree that it looks smaller in person.

100% disagree that it doesn't look as attractive. Just as stunning in person as it is in the photos IMO.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2018, 01:48 AM   #8
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,673
I watched it looks better in person it’s definitely the Reverso. The dial has such depth and texture to it. The watch underwhelming in person is Tudor divers for the opposite reason... my opinion, of course.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2018, 02:52 AM   #9
RolexDad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern CA
Watch: Too many
Posts: 120
I agree that the Black Bay lineup were underwhelming when I handled them in person finally. But I think this scenario is more common when buying sub-$1000 watches. Finish and quality is often a let down at those lower prices. That’s not something we experience with Rolex.
RolexDad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2018, 02:58 AM   #10
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
I've yet to find a Rolex where even the best photo does it justice.

And that's saying something considering the level of photography talent that we have on TRF.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2018, 03:01 AM   #11
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
almost all meteorite and MOP dial watches. The light must be perfect otherwise they look quite disappointed.
zjd168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 December 2018, 03:04 AM   #12
Bobby T
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 934
As much as I love Daytonas, they are way more impressive in photos than in person.
Bobby T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 08:34 AM   #13
123Blueface
"TRF" Member
 
123Blueface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
Didn’t disappoint at all but frankly, to me it looked way better in photos than on my wrist.
The new CHNR.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond
Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large
123Blueface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 09:15 AM   #14
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
To me they always look better on the wrist
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 09:18 AM   #15
42itus
"TRF" Member
 
42itus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tom
Location: Honolulu
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 3,828
The DSSD blue black dial looks awesome in photos. It looks pretty damn good on my brother and it looks way too big on me. I rock it anyway.
42itus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 09:32 AM   #16
nick800
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
DJ41 Blue looks better in pics
nick800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 09:57 AM   #17
VicLeChic
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
The Hulk looks fabulous on some pictures where a dark emerald dial.can be seen.

However, I found it awful on my wrist at the AD, like some bright green lizard yelling at me under certain angles then transforming into a quiet dark green almost black animal.

I still find it stunning on some of the pictures I see around.
VicLeChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 01:01 PM   #18
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by VicLeChic View Post
The Hulk looks fabulous on some pictures where a dark emerald dial.can be seen.

However, I found it awful on my wrist at the AD, like some bright green lizard yelling at me under certain angles then transforming into a quiet dark green almost black animal.

I still find it stunning on some of the pictures I see around.

In the light of day-it's stunning.
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 10:29 AM   #19
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
Walking a slippery slope here; risking insulting other owners. I love the photos of the diagonal motif on the Day Date Pt. In person I found it less eye catching. I chose the Daytona Pt instead as it is really a beauty both in person and in pictures.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vinny84 View Post
That’s funny, I just left an AD and saw a RG Daytona on OF. First thought that popped in my mind was how small it is in person. Not sure if I would consider anymore, but then again it wasn’t on my wrist either
It's an interesting conversation as I just bought the Daytona 50th Platona. Maybe with my 6.5 inch wrist there's a difference but it neither looks small nor feels small imho.

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 10:44 AM   #20
vinny84
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
Walking a slippery slope here; risking insulting other owners. I love the photos of the diagonal motif on the Day Date Pt. In person I found it less eye catching. I chose the Daytona Pt instead as it is really a beauty both in person and in pictures.



It's an interesting conversation as I just bought the Daytona 50th Platona. Maybe with my 6.5 inch wrist there's a difference but it neither looks small nor feels small imho.


Your pic makes it look like the perfect size. I think I just need to try it on
vinny84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 09:34 PM   #21
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
Walking a slippery slope here; risking insulting other owners. I love the photos of the diagonal motif on the Day Date Pt. In person I found it less eye catching. I chose the Daytona Pt instead as it is really a beauty both in person and in pictures.



It's an interesting conversation as I just bought the Daytona 50th Platona. Maybe with my 6.5 inch wrist there's a difference but it neither looks small nor feels small imho.

Having an early Christmas mate? Looks great man.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 10:57 AM   #22
ace12
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 130
They look better in person than in pictures IMO
ace12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 11:19 AM   #23
gin47
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: usa
Posts: 159
Most Rolex i have seen in pictures look way better in real life, hard to see a picture that actually does justice to a Rolex.
gin47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 12:56 PM   #24
Wcdhtwn
"TRF" Member
 
Wcdhtwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
BLNR for me. I think is looks good "in person", it isn't a disappointment, but not as good as it photographs. The opposite, watch that bores the hell out of me in pictures is the Explorer, but I think it's terrific in person.
Wcdhtwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 02:25 PM   #25
Avilanche
"TRF" Member
 
Avilanche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wristland
Watch: Submariner Hulk
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wcdhtwn View Post
BLNR for me. I think is looks good "in person", it isn't a disappointment, but not as good as it photographs. The opposite, watch that bores the hell out of me in pictures is the Explorer, but I think it's terrific in person.
I felt the same for BLNR...whereas in fotos it looks terrific, cos the blue stands out due to subtle auto image processing in fotos...
__________________
It’s about time!!!
Bluesy
HULK
MILGAUSS BLUE Z
BLNR
Avilanche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 01:27 PM   #26
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
All Daytona’s look better in person and if they are too small you are probably a breitling or Panerai person.....
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 02:19 PM   #27
AEC
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreyep View Post
How often do we hear that a watch looks so much better in reality than in photos? The new Air King, the Milgauss blue, the Exp II polar 42. In the last week I have read this about all of these on here.

But maybe there's a reference that actually disappoints in reality, while looking absolutely fabulous in photos.

Any candidates?
A friend at the office was sporting a new Cartier Tank MC the other day, and I truly tried to be wowed, but...

I'm hoping to bump into him again so I can have a closer look. I hope to have a Cartier Tank of some sort in my watch box some day (The Americaine, perhaps), and I don't think I had a long enough look at his to get a good impression.
AEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 02:26 PM   #28
T3F
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
For me, the 214270 was pretty underwhelming in person but I really liked it in photos, and I ended up selling it after ~6 months. I also like Datejusts in photos, but they always feel ill-proportioned when I try one on. Quite a few of Pateks (e.g., 5170, 5296, 5524, 5960) also fell way short of my expectations from pictures. The Speedmaster CK2998 was much more "bleh" in the metal than in photos. I hate to admit it, but I just bought a 126715CHNR a few weeks ago, and I'm not liking it nearly as much as I thought I would from the photos. For me, the rose gold doesn't really pop in person like it does it photos -- it often seems more like brown gold than rose gold, as there's very little red/rose tone -- and the brown on the bezel is too light.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral
T3F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 08:47 PM   #29
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3F View Post
For me, the 214270 was pretty underwhelming in person but I really liked it in photos, and I ended up selling it after ~6 months. I also like Datejusts in photos, but they always feel ill-proportioned when I try one on. Quite a few of Pateks (e.g., 5170, 5296, 5524, 5960) also fell way short of my expectations from pictures. The Speedmaster CK2998 was much more "bleh" in the metal than in photos. I hate to admit it, but I just bought a 126715CHNR a few weeks ago, and I'm not liking it nearly as much as I thought I would from the photos. For me, the rose gold doesn't really pop in person like it does it photos -- it often seems more like brown gold than rose gold, as there's very little red/rose tone -- and the brown on the bezel is too light.
Some useful advice... If it's underwhelming or bleh when you first see it, it won't get any better with time.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2018, 08:21 PM   #30
nch209
"TRF" Member
 
nch209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,775
I have mentioned it before, but the LVc (to me) is much better in photos. I don't know what it is- but in the flesh the green looks too milky to me, but most pics make it look good.
__________________
nch209
nch209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.