ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
3 December 2018, 01:40 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: UK
Watch: 114270, 16570
Posts: 349
|
Looks better in photos
How often do we hear that a watch looks so much better in reality than in photos? The new Air King, the Milgauss blue, the Exp II polar 42. In the last week I have read this about all of these on here.
But maybe there's a reference that actually disappoints in reality, while looking absolutely fabulous in photos. Any candidates? |
3 December 2018, 01:45 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: louisiana
Posts: 269
|
Any watch that I can’t affird
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
3 December 2018, 01:46 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 763
|
Yup. The Daytona. Looks much smaller in person which is one of the main reasons I’ve never pulled the trigger. Well that and lack of a date.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
4 December 2018, 06:28 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 252
|
Quote:
Totally agree. Looks amazing in all the incoming pictures, but the only Rolex I would classify as looking disgusting on my wrist, which is why my wife lucked out. It looks great on her wrist. However, she is also annoyed about the lack of a date. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
4 December 2018, 10:11 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 760
|
That’s funny, I just left an AD and saw a RG Daytona on OF. First thought that popped in my mind was how small it is in person. Not sure if I would consider anymore, but then again it wasn’t on my wrist either
|
4 December 2018, 12:05 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
|
|
4 December 2018, 12:08 PM | #7 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
100% disagree that it doesn't look as attractive. Just as stunning in person as it is in the photos IMO. |
|
3 December 2018, 01:48 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,673
|
I watched it looks better in person it’s definitely the Reverso. The dial has such depth and texture to it. The watch underwhelming in person is Tudor divers for the opposite reason... my opinion, of course.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
3 December 2018, 02:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern CA
Watch: Too many
Posts: 120
|
I agree that the Black Bay lineup were underwhelming when I handled them in person finally. But I think this scenario is more common when buying sub-$1000 watches. Finish and quality is often a let down at those lower prices. That’s not something we experience with Rolex.
|
3 December 2018, 02:58 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
I've yet to find a Rolex where even the best photo does it justice.
And that's saying something considering the level of photography talent that we have on TRF. |
3 December 2018, 03:01 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
|
almost all meteorite and MOP dial watches. The light must be perfect otherwise they look quite disappointed.
|
3 December 2018, 03:04 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 934
|
As much as I love Daytonas, they are way more impressive in photos than in person.
|
4 December 2018, 08:34 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
|
Didn’t disappoint at all but frankly, to me it looked way better in photos than on my wrist.
The new CHNR.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large |
4 December 2018, 09:15 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
To me they always look better on the wrist
|
4 December 2018, 09:18 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tom
Location: Honolulu
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 3,828
|
The DSSD blue black dial looks awesome in photos. It looks pretty damn good on my brother and it looks way too big on me. I rock it anyway.
|
4 December 2018, 09:32 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,581
|
DJ41 Blue looks better in pics
|
4 December 2018, 09:57 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
|
The Hulk looks fabulous on some pictures where a dark emerald dial.can be seen.
However, I found it awful on my wrist at the AD, like some bright green lizard yelling at me under certain angles then transforming into a quiet dark green almost black animal. I still find it stunning on some of the pictures I see around. |
4 December 2018, 01:01 PM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
In the light of day-it's stunning. |
|
4 December 2018, 10:29 AM | #19 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
|
Walking a slippery slope here; risking insulting other owners. I love the photos of the diagonal motif on the Day Date Pt. In person I found it less eye catching. I chose the Daytona Pt instead as it is really a beauty both in person and in pictures.
Quote:
|
|
4 December 2018, 10:44 AM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 760
|
Quote:
Your pic makes it look like the perfect size. I think I just need to try it on |
4 December 2018, 09:34 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Quote:
|
4 December 2018, 10:57 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 130
|
They look better in person than in pictures IMO
|
4 December 2018, 11:19 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: usa
Posts: 159
|
Most Rolex i have seen in pictures look way better in real life, hard to see a picture that actually does justice to a Rolex.
|
4 December 2018, 12:56 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
|
BLNR for me. I think is looks good "in person", it isn't a disappointment, but not as good as it photographs. The opposite, watch that bores the hell out of me in pictures is the Explorer, but I think it's terrific in person.
|
4 December 2018, 02:25 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wristland
Watch: Submariner Hulk
Posts: 107
|
I felt the same for BLNR...whereas in fotos it looks terrific, cos the blue stands out due to subtle auto image processing in fotos...
__________________
It’s about time!!! Bluesy HULK MILGAUSS BLUE Z BLNR |
4 December 2018, 01:27 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
All Daytona’s look better in person and if they are too small you are probably a breitling or Panerai person.....
|
4 December 2018, 02:19 PM | #27 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,376
|
Quote:
I'm hoping to bump into him again so I can have a closer look. I hope to have a Cartier Tank of some sort in my watch box some day (The Americaine, perhaps), and I don't think I had a long enough look at his to get a good impression. |
|
4 December 2018, 02:26 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
For me, the 214270 was pretty underwhelming in person but I really liked it in photos, and I ended up selling it after ~6 months. I also like Datejusts in photos, but they always feel ill-proportioned when I try one on. Quite a few of Pateks (e.g., 5170, 5296, 5524, 5960) also fell way short of my expectations from pictures. The Speedmaster CK2998 was much more "bleh" in the metal than in photos. I hate to admit it, but I just bought a 126715CHNR a few weeks ago, and I'm not liking it nearly as much as I thought I would from the photos. For me, the rose gold doesn't really pop in person like it does it photos -- it often seems more like brown gold than rose gold, as there's very little red/rose tone -- and the brown on the bezel is too light.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral |
4 December 2018, 08:47 PM | #29 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
Quote:
|
|
4 December 2018, 08:21 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,775
|
I have mentioned it before, but the LVc (to me) is much better in photos. I don't know what it is- but in the flesh the green looks too milky to me, but most pics make it look good.
__________________
nch209 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.