ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mobikid · 12 January 2019, 02:45 AM

I currently have a batman, hulk and sub ND. Now, someone wants to trade his gmt ii LN with my sub ND + 900$.

Should i do it?
Which is easier to get in the AD?

Thank you!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gotgolf52 · 12 January 2019, 02:48 AM

Both are easier to get with most AD but new buyer might have to wait for short period of time. GMT II plus $900 for ND Sub is an amazing deal. That person must want the sub badly because I would NOT trade like that.

Honinspire02 · 12 January 2019, 02:50 AM

I’d Keep the no date. The gmt ln seem to be easier to come by than sub no date.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sublovin · 12 January 2019, 02:51 AM

DO that in a second!

Daveclock · 12 January 2019, 02:59 AM

Bite his hand off.

The sub ND is the cheapest new MSRP and some say despite the "SS shortage" (apologies for mentioning such!) is the easiest one to find.

GB-man · 12 January 2019, 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gotgolf52

Both are easier to get with most AD but new buyer might have to wait for short period of time. GMT II plus $900 for ND Sub is an amazing deal. That person must want the sub badly because I would NOT trade like that.

isnt this basically the difference of msrp give or take a hundred bucks?

I would be inclined to keep the 114060 if you bought it since new. Although many of your watches are similar the 114060 has a bit of variation in the collection.

watchwatcher · 12 January 2019, 03:03 AM

Well, you're gonna end up with 2 subs/1 GMT (or vice versa) whichever way you go, so I would take that into account and go with what you want in your collection.

But, I'll admit upfront, I have no interest in speculation of what's worth more, etc. I just buy the watches I want.

jed11 · 12 January 2019, 03:37 AM

Yeah financially its a good deal...but between the two watches and your current collection taken into consideration, I'd keep the ND.

mgsooner · 12 January 2019, 03:39 AM

Having a BLNR and a LN seems redundant. I’d stick with the ND.

wahoofan5 · 12 January 2019, 04:49 AM

I'd rather stick with a ND Sub and a Hulk in the same collection than a BLNR and LN. I'd keep what you have

Seibei · 12 January 2019, 04:50 AM

ND is a keeper.

Mobikid · 12 January 2019, 05:33 AM

Price wise i was looking at prices at ch24 and there prices are almost the same.. it seems sub ND is more desirable compared to the gmt LN? Just my 2 cents

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ashbaug2 · 12 January 2019, 05:49 AM

Speaking as someone who has the LN and loves it, I'd say keep the ND sub. It's different enough from the other two in your collection that I think it fits. A second GMTc would be redundant, I think.

12 January 2019, 02:45 AM	#1
Mobikid "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Qatar Posts: 182	Sub ND vs gmt II LN I currently have a batman, hulk and sub ND. Now, someone wants to trade his gmt ii LN with my sub ND + 900$. Should i do it? Which is easier to get in the AD? Thank you! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 January 2019, 02:51 AM	#4
Sublovin 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Watch: Lots Posts: 4,595	DO that in a second! __________________ DSSD is the king of all Rolex

12 January 2019, 02:48 AM	#2
Gotgolf52 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Paradise Island Watch: Daytona 116520 Posts: 999	Both are easier to get with most AD but new buyer might have to wait for short period of time. GMT II plus $900 for ND Sub is an amazing deal. That person must want the sub badly because I would NOT trade like that.

12 January 2019, 02:50 AM	#3
Honinspire02 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Location: Usa Watch: 116681 Posts: 34	I’d Keep the no date. The gmt ln seem to be easier to come by than sub no date. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 January 2019, 02:59 AM	#5
Daveclock "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Real Name: Dave Location: UK Watch: ing and waiting! Posts: 864	Bite his hand off. The sub ND is the cheapest new MSRP and some say despite the "SS shortage" (apologies for mentioning such!) is the easiest one to find.

12 January 2019, 03:03 AM	#7
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	Well, you're gonna end up with 2 subs/1 GMT (or vice versa) whichever way you go, so I would take that into account and go with what you want in your collection. But, I'll admit upfront, I have no interest in speculation of what's worth more, etc. I just buy the watches I want.

12 January 2019, 03:37 AM	#8
jed11 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: West Side Posts: 2,718	Yeah financially its a good deal...but between the two watches and your current collection taken into consideration, I'd keep the ND.

12 January 2019, 03:39 AM	#9
mgsooner "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Real Name: Matthew Location: Tulsa, OK, USA Posts: 1,949	Having a BLNR and a LN seems redundant. I’d stick with the ND.

12 January 2019, 04:49 AM	#10
wahoofan5 Banned Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: US Watch: Sub 16610/GMT 1675 Posts: 38	I'd rather stick with a ND Sub and a Hulk in the same collection than a BLNR and LN. I'd keep what you have

12 January 2019, 04:50 AM	#11
Seibei Banned Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: New Zealand Watch: 114060 Posts: 2,630	ND is a keeper.

12 January 2019, 05:33 AM	#12
Mobikid "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Qatar Posts: 182	Price wise i was looking at prices at ch24 and there prices are almost the same.. it seems sub ND is more desirable compared to the gmt LN? Just my 2 cents Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 January 2019, 05:49 AM	#13
ashbaug2 Banned Join Date: Mar 2018 Real Name: Jon Location: Reno, NV Watch: 126710 BLRO Posts: 1,027	Speaking as someone who has the LN and loves it, I'd say keep the ND sub. It's different enough from the other two in your collection that I think it fits. A second GMTc would be redundant, I think.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)