ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
9 April 2019, 05:17 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Home
Watch: ROO Coke Speedy
Posts: 70
|
Am I being too picky?
Hi All,
Just got back my Blue theme Series H from APSC a few days ago, and notice the 6 o'clock sub-dial hand is misaligned. Should i have send by or am I being too picky? After all it did cost me 1,500 Plus tax to have it serviced. Thx all in advance. |
9 April 2019, 07:04 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/VC
Posts: 2,158
|
I sent my ROC back for a similar problem in the past right after service. It sucks to send it back and be without it a couple more weeks but they’ll fix it. I’m not sure how that gets by whatever final inspection they do.
Even the one at 9:00 looks a bit off to me at this angle. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 April 2019, 07:27 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Land of the free
Posts: 121
|
I don’t think that’s too picky at all. What a pain to have to send it back in though.
|
9 April 2019, 08:08 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
9 is tolerable the 6 is certainly not.
|
9 April 2019, 08:10 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Texas
Posts: 571
|
Send her back...sucks...but it’s going to keep bugging you since you’ve noticed it. Your eye will go straight to it every time.
They will get it back quick I’m sure. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Patek Philippe 5711/1A-010, Patek Philippe 5170G, Patek Philippe 5227R, Audemar Piguet 15400or, Audemar Piguet 15707ce, Audemar Piguet 26331IP, Audemar 15500 Blue dial, Rolex Pepsi 16710, Rolex Sub 116619LB (Smurf) F.P Journe Platinum Chronometre Souverain, Old School Breitling SuperOcean A17360, Jaeger LeCoultre Geophysic Tru Seconds Instagram: @donpedro_007 |
9 April 2019, 08:27 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,643
|
Back to be fixed - am sure they will turn it round ASAP for you
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
9 April 2019, 08:41 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: Mountains
Watch: ALS, AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 2,988
|
I’ve been annoyed by lesser things. Sorry you have to send it off again. :-(
|
9 April 2019, 08:48 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
|
6 O'clock dial has got to be fixed. it's pretty annoying tbh.
|
9 April 2019, 09:01 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Tony
Location: New York
Watch: PP 5711/1a-011
Posts: 478
|
Not picky at all. For a company that prides itself on impeccable finishing, I would imagine AP wouldn’t want something like this out there.
__________________
Instagram: @thewatchdawg |
9 April 2019, 09:51 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Christian
Location: Litchfield Park
Posts: 7
|
I'd definitely send it back, that dial would annoy me to no end.
|
9 April 2019, 11:07 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Home
Watch: ROO Coke Speedy
Posts: 70
|
Thanks Everyone for your feedback. I did contact APSC about the sub-dial and the CS person verify the issue from the pictures taken of the watch before it was send back from service. The CS person kept saying at least 3-time "its only 1mm off" and if I really want to, then they would gladly fix the problem.
|
9 April 2019, 11:41 AM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/VC
Posts: 2,158
|
Quote:
Wow that’s total bullshit. I fault the person who’s job it was to put the hands on as intended. But even worse was that quality control when the job was done for hink that was acceptable. I mean the put new hands on the sundials and then they’re supposed to check alignment and test the chronograph function. If it lines up, then put it in the case. If not, either readjust the hand or get new ones. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 April 2019, 12:22 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Christian
Location: Litchfield Park
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
|
|
9 April 2019, 11:33 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 16
|
Certainly not picky - sucks you have to send it back after dropping 1.5k. Hopefully APSC covers this trip.
|
9 April 2019, 12:44 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Clould 9
Posts: 122
|
Oh for sure, send it back!
|
9 April 2019, 04:30 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Posts: 883
|
I'd send it back, not acceptable. You are not being picky.
|
9 April 2019, 05:37 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: united states
Posts: 92
|
send it back!
|
9 April 2019, 05:45 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
That would always annoy me.
I’d have it fixed.
__________________
E |
9 April 2019, 10:35 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,348
|
They will fix that...Actually surprised they let it leave that way.
|
9 April 2019, 10:56 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: NJ
Watch: Pam Patek Rolex AP
Posts: 794
|
Def should be sent back. That is unacceptable.
|
10 April 2019, 09:30 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Viktor
Location: New York
Watch: Broad Arrow
Posts: 98
|
You're not being picky. That watch should not have passed QC and wasn't supposed to be shipped out like that.
|
10 April 2019, 10:35 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Dubai
Posts: 36
|
I don’t understand how such brand can let this pass the quality check.
|
10 April 2019, 10:52 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
|
Definitely send it back. That's ridiculous. Been seeing more and more of these types of posts. As someone who has constantly supported and defended AP and APSC, this is becoming harder and harder to do. This is unacceptable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
11 April 2019, 12:05 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 409
|
not picky at all
|
11 April 2019, 11:52 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: AP||Panerai||Rolex
Posts: 759
|
Not worth it to spend money on something that bothers you. Send it back as it’s really off the 6 subdial.
|
12 April 2019, 07:11 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Real Name: Syahril
Location: Bogor, Indonesia
Watch: Rolex, Omega
Posts: 650
|
I'd send it back.....its USD 1.5k....not a small amount of money
__________________
- Rolex RG Daytona 116505 - Rolex SS Submariner "Hulk" - Rolex SS Sky Dweller "Black Dial" - Rolex SS GMT Master II 16710 "Coke" - Rolex GMT Master II CHNR "Rootbeer" TT - Rolex SS Daytona Ceramic 116500LN "Black Dial" - Rolex 126710 "New Batman" 2022 - Rolex SS/WG Datejust 41 126334 "Blue Roman" - Panerai "PAM 88" GMT - Omega New Moonwatch 3861 |
12 April 2019, 07:16 PM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
I think my head would explode after a certain amount of time looking at that.
Not worth me dying when I can send it back to get fixed. It should never have left the service centre like that.
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
12 April 2019, 07:19 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: steve
Location: sydney
Watch: SMURF
Posts: 653
|
maybe i'm having a bad day or something but i would have been steamed at them implying you should tolerate it because it is only 1 mm off. frankly it's belittling and if that's not important on a luxury precision sports watch what is?
it is outrageous (and weirdly i actually mean that) that upon seeing a photo the tech didn't say "I'm so sorry, that is unacceptable". That would have validated your concern and highlighted that the person you were talking to had standards which would in turn reassure you the valued customer. i mean i know i'm being a bit over the top maybe but rationality went out the window when they started asking boat money for these things so it's not like we started it! |
12 April 2019, 10:08 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,369
|
Which APSC was this? Its clearly not acceptable to be returned like that, but what I find even more unacceptable is the operative's apparent attitude towards it. I'm shocked that an official APSC would make such a comment and would complain strongly to a higher authority.
|
13 April 2019, 01:15 AM | #30 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Home
Watch: ROO Coke Speedy
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.