ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
9 February 2009, 04:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: MF 5513
Posts: 71
|
Submariner Dial Question
New guy here. I just found this site today and have a question about Sub dials.
I've got a 5513 serial number 238XXX. I'm pretty sure it was made in 1969 or so. The dial reads 200m 660ft. The hour markers have been refinished some time in the past, but I never liked the way it looked. Also, the 56-59 minute markers are worn off. Some time ago I got another dial on ebay that looked better. Still refinished, but I like it better(and it glows in the dark). The trouble is that the new dial looks slightly smaller in diameter to me. Does the crystal slightly magnify the dial, thus creating the illusion? Did I get the wrong dial? Did I get a fake dial? Am I imagining all of this? I figured eventually I would have the watch serviced and the dial replaced at the same time. I've owned it for about 5 years. I appreciate any input on this you guys might have. And I am aware of the search function but didn't find anything. |
9 February 2009, 04:18 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Richard
Location: USA
Watch: YM Deep Space
Posts: 12,521
|
First off, Welcome to TRF!!
I am not expert and will wait for the others to chime in here. Just wanted to say Welcome!!!!
__________________
Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623 Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC. Omega Speedmaster 3510.50 Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM |
9 February 2009, 04:25 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: MF 5513
Posts: 71
|
|
10 February 2009, 02:18 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: MF 5513
Posts: 71
|
Maybe someone this morning will know?
|
10 February 2009, 08:26 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Well, I can't tell a lot by the size of the photo, but it does seem to be re-done to me. Acryllic crystals can distort a bit.
I can't see if there is any type of identifying feature on the back--Singer, Breyler, etc... |
10 February 2009, 08:58 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: MF 5513
Posts: 71
|
You can't see it from the picture, but the back of the dial does say SINGER on it. I suppose I can just take it to an AD. I just didn't want to show up with the wrong dial in my hands and look like an idiot.
|
10 February 2009, 09:13 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Send the watch to Bob Ridley, he can fix the original dial to look like new!
www.watchmakers.com Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
10 February 2009, 09:26 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: MF 5513
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
Is refinishing the original dial preferable to replacing it? Even if the replacement dial is identical(seemingly)? |
|
10 February 2009, 09:48 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
Generally (with all disclaimers in place) the pecking order is original, service replacement, re-fin. I think a big factor is the reference involved. A rare model or a hard to find model (especially with a dial that's shot) might benefit from a gentle restoration. I think a period correct replacement is the better option to the puriest knowing the watch is now not original. One also has to look at the value of the given reference, the cost of sourcing a correct period replacement and the future value of the end product (if that can even be done). Depending on what you want from the watch Bob can do wonders and has the eye of the vintage community. Since it's already been re-done in some manner might as well have it done right. Just some thoughts. |
|
10 February 2009, 10:49 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: MF 5513
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
Now I just have to decide what will work best for me. |
|
10 February 2009, 10:58 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
I would listen to Mike and find a period correct dial.
If you ever sell it, the value would be significantly more than a 're-finished' dial. In these vintage watches it all about dial and hands (and case, movement, bracelet, ) |
10 February 2009, 11:44 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: MF 5513
Posts: 71
|
This is my first Rolex and will likely be my last. And unless I fall on very hard times, I can't see ever selling it. I bought it 5 years ago when I was 22. Now, it needs to be serviced and I would like it to look a little better while I'm at it. It's hard to tell from the pictures, but the loose dial does look much better than the one in the watch. I suppose there's nothing I can do now that can't be undone some time in the future.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.