ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 June 2019, 03:31 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,881
|
Black Bay GMT - Cons?
A question to those who :
-have owned one and eventually let it go -those who considered buying but finally passed on it -those who would never consider acquiring one What was/is the deal breaker for you? Thanks |
30 June 2019, 03:35 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
How it wears is why I passed. Too thick compared to Rolex GMTs. Otherwise very attractive watch... I thought it was snowflake overkill from pics but in person it works well. Awesome insert that plays with light well also.
|
30 June 2019, 03:44 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
|
Guess my answer doesn't count cause I love mine and thrilled I have it.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
30 June 2019, 04:01 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
|
Likewise! You really need to try it on for yourself and decide. The most common “complaint” seems to be that it’s too thick or too big; my wrist is flat and has a concave area where the watch sits so it looks fine to me. Only you can decide
|
30 June 2019, 06:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 699
|
|
30 June 2019, 03:47 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex 1665
Posts: 295
|
I flipped mine because it wore very high on my wrist. I think it would be better in a 40 mm case size as well.
|
30 June 2019, 03:52 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Passed because I have a s&g and it is thick.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
30 June 2019, 03:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
Too big and slabby for me. Now that the 58 exists, I won't ever be buying something based on the larger BB 41mm.
|
30 June 2019, 04:07 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
My heritage chrono is thick. I love that watch. Don’t let the thickness put you off. It’s not a dress watch. I don’t even notice.
|
30 June 2019, 04:11 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,624
|
I love mine as well
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk |
30 June 2019, 04:34 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,881
|
Having owned a S&G, my biggest complaint wasn't so much the lateral case thickness but how tall the case looked between the lugs when worn on the fabric strap. Add the vertical brushed finish with end link marks and there you have my deal breaker.
The bevelled under case edges of the GMT look really well thought out and having a rather flat wrist I believe the sides thickness would probably not bother me. I was offered one last year but being abroad at the time, I had to pass and missed the chance of seeing it in the metal. Full disclosure: I've had the itch ever since. So one morning I called to enquire how hard would it be to source one... Me: How hard would a BB GMT be to come by? AD: Very. Strap or bracelet? Me: Bracelet. AD: Even harder. Would it be for yourself? Me: Yep AD: Well...In that case, give us a few days, next one in, is yours if you want it. I just couldn't say no ... Picking up next week I really hope I won't be disappointed but if I am, I will consider offering it, unworn, to another TRF member at a small amount below retail. |
30 June 2019, 05:12 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
I have the S&G and the GMT. Completely agree, S&G looks a bit silly on the strap, owing to the position of the lugholes. I’ve got the GMT on an Erika’s Originals MN (the woven BB straps seem too flimsy, though got the GMT on steel). See attached photos for how it sits with the strap. Still thick and I’ve considered moving the watch on, but know I’d regret it. Incidentally, despite its thickness, the S&G gets most wrist time out of the entire collection. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
30 June 2019, 05:24 AM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
|
LOVE LOVE LOVE my GMT - it's not going anywhere.
Trying to think of a negative and (for me) I can't think of anything. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk |
30 June 2019, 05:37 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
Didn't like the chunkiness or the colors. Non-starter for me.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
30 June 2019, 05:38 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 104
|
Had one and traded it towards the new Omega SMP. My Tudor GMT was on the leather strap and never sat quite right on my wrist. Loved the looks of it and got more compliments on it than any other watch.
If they come out with a BB58 GMT version I am getting it. |
30 June 2019, 06:05 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,283
|
Picked it up on bracelet, wore it on that as well as the Tudor fabric strap. I enjoyed it on both - while thick, the bevels on the bottom of each side of the case, plus the rounded case back, made it really comfortable.
The dial and bezel insert were enjoyable to look at and I like the snowflake hands. Ended up getting rid of it for no reason other than to sink the funds into something else. I’d own one again if the right deal came along, no question, but when making cuts, it was far from my top priority to keep, so it went. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.