ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
27 August 2019, 06:38 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
A tale of two blue. Would you have done the same?
Dear Watch Fam,
A short story of a recent switch that took place in my collection. I bought a Boutique 15400or on bracelet with the blue dial 2 years ago. Then at SIHH '17, I was blown away with the new 26331or. I loved the lighter blue dial and the gold subdials along with its new design. The date window was not my favourite but I decided to look past it. After all, no more screw down pushers! So, I sold the 15400 and bought the 26331 last month. So far, I love the more "sportier" feel of the chrono. Do I miss looking at the 3120 movement? Sometimes. I just felt that one needs to own an 1185 FP at some point. I find that legibility is not great with the chrono and I do sometimes miss the cleaner dial of the 15400. All in all, I'm happy with the switch. Now I want to know this: Would you have replaced your 15400 with the 26331? Thanks fam. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
27 August 2019, 06:49 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
All look the same blue to me.
|
6 September 2019, 05:33 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
It’s just a tad different. 15400 almost looks black in most lightning. Chrono is slightly more “blue”. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
6 September 2019, 06:06 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Dubai/Los Angeles
Watch: a few
Posts: 595
|
|
27 August 2019, 07:12 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 610
|
yes the window date is a shame! why they didn't make it centered. annoying.
|
27 August 2019, 08:50 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
|
You can't go wrong with either brother, so enjoy the chrono it's beautiful! If I'm being completely frank and honest, that blue tapisserie dial, clean, without the sub dials is stunning. I'm biased cause I have a blue 15500st, but the blue with your OR is INCREDIBLE!
|
27 August 2019, 08:53 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Think you made a good call, I preferred the ROC too at 41mm as the dial can get pretty wide otherwise, and the gold subdials work nicely with the case.
|
27 August 2019, 08:57 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Watch: Patek 5205r-010
Posts: 641
|
I skipped your first step and went right to the 26331or as my first AP.
|
27 August 2019, 10:23 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: California
Watch: PP,AP,Rolex,IWC
Posts: 578
|
I actually like the 15400or on your wrist more
|
27 August 2019, 10:35 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: PAM512
Posts: 333
|
Both stunning, but I think you made the right choice. Enjoy!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 August 2019, 10:41 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,356
|
Both are great and can't lose but he chronologically just pops a bit more. The gold subdials really have an "effect". Love it.
|
27 August 2019, 01:02 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
|
Two fantastic pieces. I'm always partial to RO over ROC or ROO but if you prefer the sense of the ROC then of course you made the right decision.
|
27 August 2019, 03:13 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Posts: 883
|
Like them both, but would have kept the 15400OR blue, but you can't really go wrong with either one. Enjoy the 26331OR!
|
27 August 2019, 05:08 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: EU
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 1,274
|
I’d keep the 15400OR and add a 26331ST blue. I preferred the plain dial of the 400 in the OR version
|
27 August 2019, 11:01 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Francesco
Location: Toronto
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 176
|
I would of kept the 15400, the plain dial is stunning and I hate the fact that the Chrono is not an in house movement. Also, clear caseback is a plus with the 15400
|
27 August 2019, 11:33 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,348
|
Yep - I like the direction you took!
Great pics too! |
28 August 2019, 01:44 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,640
|
I love both but the contrast of the sub dials on the Chrono make the watch for me. I just wish I could pull it off but won't work on my 6.5" wrists
|
30 August 2019, 06:53 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
I'm at 6.75". I can barely pull it off. 39mm was just perfect in my opinion...
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
30 August 2019, 10:49 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,640
|
Quote:
I have the 15450 and it’s perfect for me Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Michelle |
|
28 August 2019, 02:26 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
|
Both beautiful! So if you ended up with the one you prefer then all the better! COngrats!
|
30 August 2019, 06:52 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
Thank you good sir.
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
28 August 2019, 04:22 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: YYZ
Watch: PP AP Rolex PAM
Posts: 348
|
On strap, the 15400or works the best. Classier, dressier look.
On bracelet...I think the chrono is the way to go Had both, still have the 15400or on strap. I think you wound up with the right one ....although we are splitting hairs. |
28 August 2019, 08:22 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: London
Posts: 4,452
|
I love that 26331. Its a beaut. Nice swap.
__________________
@watchtheleftwrist |
28 August 2019, 08:34 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 49
|
All looks beautiful. The choice is yours
|
28 August 2019, 06:02 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Dubai/Los Angeles
Watch: a few
Posts: 595
|
You made the right choice Amir. & seeing as to how you didn't have any chronos in your collection before it was the perfect addition. That 1185 is buttery smooth & one of the thinnest and best chrono movements made. The ROCs thinness is just amazing, and guaranteed when the new in-house chrono makes its way from the 11.59 to the ROC, we'll see the thickness increase quite a bit.
Enjoy in good health! |
30 August 2019, 06:52 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
|
29 August 2019, 02:29 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: LA<>NY
Watch: Rolex♠Lange
Posts: 2,277
|
They are both stunners, I personally would go 400R due to easier wearability. As much as I love a see thru case back especially on an RO the ROC caseback with the old school logo and font is so damn cool. That one along with the previous Overseas case back are the coolest ones.
|
31 August 2019, 11:06 PM | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
Quote:
Both are great looking watch but I preffer 26331. Looks more sporty and I don’t have any problem with mine about legibility. Also accuracy of 26331 it’s very good. IMO you do the right choice! |
|
1 September 2019, 04:02 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,963
|
Quote:
You made a great move up Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
4 September 2019, 03:41 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 156
|
The chrono variant has always had a bigger "wow" factor for me in person. I think you made a great decision.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.