ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 October 2019, 02:28 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 456
|
Breitling still confused in their product line
Was excited to see the recent announcement of the update to the Avenger line .. (since i own an avenger in yellow)
So i was surprised when their PR describes this as a pilots watch .. https://www.breitling.com/us-en/watc...A17319101I1X1/ -- the damm watch is rated to 3000M and has a helium escape valve. That is not a pilots watch -- thats a diver .. so why is breitling selling this as a pilots watch.. oh well .. the new breitling .. same as the old breitling. dont get me wrong .. i love breitlings .. i own 2 already .. and i'm probably buying 2 more in the next 6 months . |
5 October 2019, 02:49 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
|
Quote:
I mean I appreciate the versatility of that line. I mean with the traditional navi and Speedmaster their water resistance is next to 0. And thus would not get much wrist time on my vacations. You get the look of an aviator watch but robust enough to be worn everywhere. |
|
5 October 2019, 02:50 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
The Avenger line has always been considered a Pilot model from Breitling. Nothing new.
|
5 October 2019, 03:24 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,959
|
Must a watch be a uni-tasker?
Can’t pilots also dive, or divers fly? Serenity - from the announcement: With an impressive water resistance, the Seawolf is at ease up in the air and deep down the oceans. Thanks to its rugged bezel and its special grip-pattern on the crown, the Avenger Automatic 45 Seawolf can be easily operated wearing gloves. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
5 October 2019, 04:02 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 456
|
yes -- of course watches have multi purposes ..
but as a brand and a PR message .. it would be simpler to tell one story.. and given that the added water resistance of some parts of the line .. add significant weight and size .. making it do double duty imo is a mistake. |
5 October 2019, 11:58 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Justin
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,307
|
Only one of the Avengers has the 3000 ft water rating and that’s the Seawolf which has always been a dive watch. While all the Avenger watches are being marketed as pilot watches, the description of this watch on their website mentions it can easily be a dive watch as well.
“Bold, extremely robust and shock resistant, the Avenger Automatic 45 Seawolf is a pilots’ watch prepared for adventures well below the ocean’s surface (up to 300 bars - 3.000m). As a true Breitling Avenger, it can be used wearing gloves and offers unrivalled safety and reliability to any airborne adventurer. The Avenger Automatic 45 Seawolf features a sturdy 45mm stainless-steel case, striking yellow dial and a choice of a stainless-steel bracelet, or black military leather strap that fits either a stainless-steel pin buckle or folding clasp. With an impressive water resistance, the Seawolf is at ease up in the air and deep down the oceans. Thanks to its rugged bezel and its special grip-pattern on the crown, the Avenger Automatic 45 Seawolf can be easily operated wearing gloves.” |
5 October 2019, 11:54 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 456
|
exactly -- i should have been more clear -- the rest of the avenger line is properly placed..
the seawolf is the one that is carelessly placed. little details like this make a difference in my opinion .. |
6 October 2019, 12:44 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 988
|
I think Breitling’s future is bright. I already like what Georges Kern has done with the brand.
I’ve got an Avenger II Seawolf now and likely will add another Breitling reference at some point. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
29 November 2019, 01:54 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: USA
Watch: What I am wearing.
Posts: 1,879
|
Tend to agree with this. I started in watches with Breitling over 10 years ago, and moved on from them a few years after because I thought the brand was fading badly. Last 6 months is the first time they have quickened my pulse in years. I think they are pulling it together again. Slowly but surely.
__________________
Rolex │ H. Moser │ F.P. Journe │ Audemars Piquet │ Patek Philippe _______________________________ "I'm not playing hard to get, I'm playing hard to want." |
19 January 2020, 02:32 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: On Assignment
Posts: 2
|
Breitling has been in an identity crisis for 70 years. My 1951 Breitling looks like most of the watches of the time, except has a little more panache with its 6 o'clock seconds subdial. Keeps time like an atomic clock.
When the 1960s came, so did the space race and the drive to compete in the super-complex navigational timepieces. That's where the Navitimer and Cosmonaute fought it out after Breitling's patent of the Cosmonaute name. In the 1970s, Breitling was all askew with having failed to beat Omega in the space race, while trying to keep up with Rolex in the fashion and sports watch hybrid race. The Navitimer just proved to be a little too complex, when the Chronomat eased its way into the range of products. The Astromat-Chronograph, one of 700 pieces that were made from old bits and pieces and specially numbered as "collectible" pieces moved that on into the 1990s after the Navitimer's heyday. Then came the J-class for yachting--how many of us do that?--on that nice bullet bracelet with a simple uni-directional bezel and four directional markers, typically in gold, so they could say 18K and SS. After a half dozen of these transitional pieces, including the UTM module that fit only a 22 and 18 mm specially-made strap after the original rubber dried out and cracked, I went back to the good old manual-wind 1951. The new gigantic Hublot-like monstrosities that Breitling have been making have pushed me to some other aeronautic flieger-type marques (I won't name the brands, but there are several nice German outfits with spectacular kits). That's my ho-hum. WmcP |
19 January 2020, 03:35 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 456
|
I own 2 breitling pieces --
An avenger 2 seawolf .. and a navitimer .. love them both .. -- but its because i think breitling provides lots of vaalue at their price point that i am critical .. - the seawolf does not fit the rest of the line its in .. my $0.02 |
26 January 2020, 05:14 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: N/A
Location: USA
Posts: 173
|
It's for when you crash into the ocean... in a dive suit...
|
27 January 2020, 07:12 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Plankton
Location: US
Watch: less
Posts: 4,155
|
At one time I owned over 20 various Breitling models until they started increasing there size. They are too big for my taste. All gone now.
|
27 January 2020, 12:12 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Personally, I like the additional water resistance. I wish more “aviation” watches had better WR ratings like this. I bought the new Avenger chrono for many reasons, the WR was one of the big ones.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.