ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 November 2019, 06:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 109
|
Which is preferred 42mm submersible?
I know the 42mm size isn’t particularly favoured for panerai but it’s a nice size for me and I do like the look of the submersible- very different to my other watches.
I note that there are a number of options now, black bezel, metal bezel, blue and grey, green and even carbontech and wondered what was people’s preferred option? |
29 November 2019, 07:17 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
|
I had a 682 with a display back.
Prefer the p.9010 inhouse movement. I think an all-metal bezel looks better on the Submersible. |
29 November 2019, 07:28 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 97
|
I'm an owner of a 682 with solid case back which drew lots of compliments since owning it for 2 months. I luv its size n look. I felt we shud not restrict ourselves to sizes of at least 44mm n above. This watch is certainly one of my favourite.
Rolex TT CHNR Rootbeer Rolex TT Daytona 116503 Black Dial Rolex DJ 41 126334 Blue Roman Rolex DJ 41 126300 Blue Stick Panerai 00682 Submersible Sinn U1 Camouflage Seiko Samurai SRPB 51J |
29 November 2019, 07:34 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 109
|
Yes I think I agree that the metal bezel looks nicer. It’s a bit surprising how often the 682/973 has changed. I think I’d prefer an in house movement but the smaller height is more wearable imo.
I like the look of the 1055 but not sure green would be easy to wear. |
29 November 2019, 08:07 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 413
|
682 is much more versatile,I’d go with green dial if I already have other dial colors
Personally I’ve tried 382,911 and the new 1940s green but I just don’t love it as much as I had hoped for and that means no go in my book |
29 November 2019, 11:56 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: marc
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,366
|
gotta be the 682. call me a snob but since they took “luminor” off the dial I’m not interested.
|
29 November 2019, 01:25 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,407
|
682
|
29 November 2019, 04:20 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tokyo
Watch: SD43,PAM1616,Hulk
Posts: 3,567
|
682 is still the best!
|
30 November 2019, 03:07 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: Hulk
Posts: 42
|
I like all the 42mm subs -- but love my 682 with display back and P.9010. Perfect size, comfortable on the wrist, great design -- and an excellent companion to a Submariner.
__________________
Rolex Line-up: 116610 LVc 116710 GMT2c 216570 Exp2 Polar |
1 December 2019, 02:21 PM | #10 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: marc
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,366
|
Quote:
great minds think alike! |
|
1 December 2019, 12:33 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Perth, Western Au
Posts: 53
|
I was looking for a more wearable, everyday PAM, so the 42mm submersibles ticked all the boxes for me. I tried on the 682, 683, and the new version of the 682 (can't remember the number). I debated back and forth between the 682 and 683, but personally, I really liked the thinner profile of the new breed and thought the black bezel gave it a bit more pop.
Sent from my BBB100-2 using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.