The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 January 2020, 01:56 AM   #1
raywatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 36
Icon20 Cant decide Patek 5164a or AP 26331IP?

Hey I would love to get some honest opinions from you guys please

I am in a position to trade my 5164a 2016 for 26331IP 2018 as a direct exchange both used in great condition (around 44000 usd)

What do you think? I just love the dial of 26331IP after I saw it today

Or should I keep 5164a? What would you do?

I also like to ask 26331 IP owners: does the bezel scratch much more easily than the steel version ROC?

Thanks a lot
raywatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 02:15 AM   #2
Bearxj86
"TRF" Member
 
Bearxj86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,894
You will lose about $10k in that trade; but the 26331ip is stunning
Bearxj86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 02:29 AM   #3
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,354
To me that would be a big mistake. Do what feels right for your collection.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 11:03 AM   #4
Fat_ninja
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
To me that would be a big mistake. Do what feels right for your collection.
Yup
Fat_ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 02:39 AM   #5
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Big fan of the 5164 so its a no from me, the IP is a cool piece but not seen many incomings here, maybe the bezel scares people off.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 03:20 AM   #6
raywatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Big fan of the 5164 so its a no from me, the IP is a cool piece but not seen many incomings here, maybe the bezel scares people off.
If we take out the value of both watches and consider them as what they are
Would it be a still no?

If you just decide purely on their beauty of the dial, strap/bracelet and movement
Would AP win in this case or you guys still prefer the 5164a

thanks
raywatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 06:30 AM   #7
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by raywatch View Post
If we take out the value of both watches and consider them as what they are
Would it be a still no?

If you just decide purely on their beauty of the dial, strap/bracelet and movement
Would AP win in this case or you guys still prefer the 5164a

thanks
Interesting you say value as the 5164 has been my fave SS watch for over 5 years but before the hype the price was ridiculous I thought for a lowly SS so I didn't buy even with a 20% discount, but a couple of years ago I decided I want what I want and had been thru a few Rolex PMs to know it was time, so I pulled the trigger at a small discount just before the price took off. For me it has a beautifully crafted, elegant dial, love the 3D numerals, the subdial, the grey sunburst, the light weight and the useful comp ... and now great resale too, so just a great all rounder for me.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 07:53 AM   #8
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by raywatch View Post
If we take out the value of both watches and consider them as what they are
Would it be a still no?

If you just decide purely on their beauty of the dial, strap/bracelet and movement
Would AP win in this case or you guys still prefer the 5164a

thanks
I have never been a fan of the Aquanaut. Looks like a kids watch to me and design wise to my eyes its a flop. Without the Patek brand name many people wouldn't look twice at it.

The 26331IP is one of my favourite watches so I am very biased towards it. I wear mine regularly.
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 07:49 AM   #9
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Big fan of the 5164 so its a no from me, the IP is a cool piece but not seen many incomings here, maybe the bezel scares people off.
I have one and I love it !
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 02:43 AM   #10
yoast
"TRF" Member
 
yoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,288
That would be a no for me
__________________
IG: @yoast.watch
https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/
yoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 04:10 AM   #11
singaporepatek
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 152
I would do the trade because I don’t like the Aquanaut and 26331 is spectacular.
singaporepatek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 04:17 AM   #12
pepsiretail
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by singaporepatek View Post
I would do the trade because I don’t like the Aquanaut and 26331 is spectacular.
What I was thinking as well
pepsiretail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 05:00 AM   #13
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by singaporepatek View Post
I would do the trade because I don’t like the Aquanaut and 26331 is spectacular.


My thoughts too, I love the Nautilus & Royal Oak but don’t understand the attraction to the aquanaut even though I know it’s meant to look understated I just think it looks underwhelming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 04:11 AM   #14
APAP
"TRF" Member
 
APAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
5164a for sure
APAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 04:28 AM   #15
ufboy73
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
No way...even if setting aside “value”
ufboy73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 09:56 AM   #16
dauster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by raywatch View Post
Hey I would love to get some honest opinions from you guys please

I am in a position to trade my 5164a 2016 for 26331IP 2018 as a direct exchange both used in great condition (around 44000 usd)

What do you think? I just love the dial of 26331IP after I saw it today

Or should I keep 5164a? What would you do?

I also like to ask 26331 IP owners: does the bezel scratch much more easily than the steel version ROC?

Thanks a lot
I would sell the aquanaut for market price myself and then buy the 26331IP ... but the 5164a is my favorite casual watch so I would not do it personally but also haven’t seen the platinum sparkle in person so maybe that would change my mind. Last but not least I love the travel time feature. One of the few mechanical watch features that is actually useful in my opinion.
dauster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 10:02 AM   #17
jumpmandk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: 1
Posts: 244
I'm biased having the IP but would vote for it 100%.

Don't let seller talk you into limited edition as a selling point as 500 of these were produced.
jumpmandk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 10:40 AM   #18
RHIII
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
Not a CHANCE. The 5164 is my favorite daily Patek—and I love that AP but wouldn’t part with the 5164 for it.
RHIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 06:49 PM   #19
cascavel
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,898
I would not ever do this trade, but that's just me. Beautiful, elegant useful Patek for yet another sort of L/E, oversized A/P R/O chronograph. Hurts to even contemplate.
cascavel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 11:04 PM   #20
P2725TMB
2024 Pledge Member
 
P2725TMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascavel View Post
I would not ever do this trade, but that's just me. Beautiful, elegant useful Patek for yet another sort of L/E, oversized A/P R/O chronograph. Hurts to even contemplate.
I think it's unfair to say the RO Chronos are 'oversized', as it depends upon what one likes and is used to. Having preferred and worn bigger watches for many years that's my preference and in all in honesty an ROC seems a bit small, although in actuality its probably the perfect size for me. However, my newly acquired Rolex BLRO does seem too small. The 26631IP is a beautiful watch and would be much preferable to the PP, but that's just my opinion.
P2725TMB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 04:24 AM   #21
cascavel
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by P2725TMB View Post
I think it's unfair to say the RO Chronos are 'oversized', as it depends upon what one likes and is used to. Having preferred and worn bigger watches for many years that's my preference and in all in honesty an ROC seems a bit small, although in actuality its probably the perfect size for me. However, my newly acquired Rolex BLRO does seem too small. The 26631IP is a beautiful watch and would be much preferable to the PP, but that's just my opinion.
You're right, it is unfair to say that the RO Chronos are oversized, but that's just my opinion.
However, A/P does seem to pop out a lot of chronographs, whether RO or ROC, most on the high side of 40mm. And a lot of them are L/Es. And I don't see how adding a platinum bezel should increase the value of this particular model by $20K. I've owned a three A/P chronos and my experience was that they do not hold their value, RO buyers want the basic three hand model or the 15202.
I don't dislike the 26631IP but on a trade basis I definitely think the guy taking the 5164a is getting the better end.
cascavel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 08:07 AM   #22
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascavel View Post
You're right, it is unfair to say that the RO Chronos are oversized, but that's just my opinion.
However, A/P does seem to pop out a lot of chronographs, whether RO or ROC, most on the high side of 40mm. And a lot of them are L/Es. And I don't see how adding a platinum bezel should increase the value of this particular model by $20K. I've owned a three A/P chronos and my experience was that they do not hold their value, RO buyers want the basic three hand model or the 15202.
I don't dislike the 26631IP but on a trade basis I definitely think the guy taking the 5164a is getting the better end.
I think the size, objectively measured when including the lugs and the overhang where the bracelet strap connects makes it larger than watches, like a Daytona, though the dial size is roughly the same, the watch appears and wears bigger since it sits on a greater area of the wrist.

FWIW, these seem to have held up in value when I was considering this vs the regular ROC in October, but then again all RO and ROC seem to be holding better in value in the current watch craze and financial asset bubble than they used to only 2-3 years ago.

Looks like both sides are happy, and for certain circles in Asia, I think it's a killer watch to have stand out from the sea of Pateks.
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2020, 10:40 PM   #23
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,536
Hold
ap1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 12:13 AM   #24
raywatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 36
Hi guys thank you for all the discussions

I HAVE made the exchange as:
(1) I already have the Nautilus 5990 so still have a travel time watch
(2) the MSRP price of the AP is actually more expensive!
(3) Just wanna try different materials than stainless steel

and when I saw it today for the first time in the light - WOW its really took my breathe away: to me this just confirms my decision
and its not heavy at all :)

Thanks again guys
raywatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 12:34 AM   #25
Bearxj86
"TRF" Member
 
Bearxj86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by raywatch View Post
Hi guys thank you for all the discussions

I HAVE made the exchange as:
(1) I already have the Nautilus 5990 so still have a travel time watch
(2) the MSRP price of the AP is actually more expensive!
(3) Just wanna try different materials than stainless steel

and when I saw it today for the first time in the light - WOW its really took my breathe away: to me this just confirms my decision
and its not heavy at all :)

Thanks again guys
Congrats my man! Yes, the weight should be similar to steel because titanium is 60% the weight of steel on the bracelet but Platinum bezel and links go the other way.
Bearxj86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 12:40 AM   #26
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by raywatch View Post
Hi guys thank you for all the discussions

I HAVE made the exchange as:
(1) I already have the Nautilus 5990 so still have a travel time watch
(2) the MSRP price of the AP is actually more expensive!
(3) Just wanna try different materials than stainless steel

and when I saw it today for the first time in the light - WOW its really took my breathe away: to me this just confirms my decision
and its not heavy at all :)

Thanks again guys
Good decision!

Breath taking criteria trumps everything else.
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 07:55 AM   #27
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by raywatch View Post
Hi guys thank you for all the discussions

I HAVE made the exchange as:
(1) I already have the Nautilus 5990 so still have a travel time watch
(2) the MSRP price of the AP is actually more expensive!
(3) Just wanna try different materials than stainless steel

and when I saw it today for the first time in the light - WOW its really took my breathe away: to me this just confirms my decision
and its not heavy at all :)

Thanks again guys
Great decision. You will not regret it!!!
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 12:14 AM   #28
raywatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 36
photos coming sooon!!
raywatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 08:44 AM   #29
pepsiretail
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by raywatch View Post
photos coming sooon!!
Awesome very special piece
pepsiretail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2020, 01:07 AM   #30
P2725TMB
2024 Pledge Member
 
P2725TMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,367
A very wise choice indeed!
P2725TMB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
26331ip , 5164a , patek


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.