ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Carnauba · 25 January 2020, 12:57 AM

Hello

I’m a newbie on this forum and I ask you about this MK3 insert ...

Does it OK ?

Thanks in advance . Have a nice WE

stmoore · 25 January 2020, 03:58 AM

Well you covered up the 5 - this doesn't help.
At a quick glance it's a 3.3 or the last of the MK3.

On what year of watch is it going?

As an example, I expect a 1665 rail dial to have a 3.3 insert on it (it's a 5.7ish million watch), so about 1978.

linesiders · 25 January 2020, 04:11 AM

From what I see on the 40 - it is Fake.

However, you would really need to go out of your way to take a worse photo ; )

Straight on shot, all numbers, phone on a stack of books 6-8 inches high. FOCUSED.

stmoore · 25 January 2020, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by linesiders

From what I see on the 40 - it is Fake.

However, you would really need to go out of your way to take a worse photo ; )

Straight on shot, all numbers, phone on a stack of books 6-8 inches high. FOCUSED.

Hubble had better images

linesiders · 25 January 2020, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmoore

Hubble had better images

After they fixed the mirrors, yes ; )

Carnauba · 25 January 2020, 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by linesiders

From what I see on the 40 - it is Fake.

However, you would really need to go out of your way to take a worse photo ; )

Straight on shot, all numbers, phone on a stack of books 6-8 inches high. FOCUSED.

Hello

before saying unpleasant words, I want to tell you that this is not my pic it is that of the seller!

Carnauba · 25 January 2020, 05:52 AM

before saying unpleasant words! I want to tell you that this is not my pic !!! it is t the seller photo !!!

1675-David · 25 January 2020, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carnauba

it is t the seller photo !!!

That’s a red flag to begin with... that and the home made fade

stmoore · 25 January 2020, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carnauba

before saying unpleasant words! I want to tell you that this is not my pic !!! it is t the seller photo !!!

So get a photo of the complete insert, please. In focus.

42itus · 25 January 2020, 07:40 AM

I'm far from an expert but that fade does not look good. Does seeing the back of it help?

1665fan · 25 January 2020, 10:18 AM

Artificial fade for sure.....fade just around the edge is a tell sign

onthedial · 25 January 2020, 03:36 PM

@Carnauba
Strategically bad (seller) pics. Walk away.
————
IG: @onthedial

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

linesiders · 25 January 2020, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carnauba

Hello

before saying unpleasant words, I want to tell you that this is not my pic it is that of the seller!

We are trying to help you, you are denying us the information to help you. Nothing unpleasant about trying to help you.

bayerische · 25 January 2020, 07:04 PM

Based on this one poor picture, I say not genuine.

swatty · 25 January 2020, 07:38 PM

The seller only sent you one pic ?
Not looking good, many red flags

25 January 2020, 12:57 AM	#1
Carnauba "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: France Posts: 4	Thoughts about this MK3 insert Hello I’m a newbie on this forum and I ask you about this MK3 insert ... Does it OK ? Thanks in advance . Have a nice WE Attached Images

25 January 2020, 04:11 AM	#3
linesiders 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: RedSox Nation Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis Posts: 5,503	From what I see on the 40 - it is Fake. However, you would really need to go out of your way to take a worse photo ; ) Straight on shot, all numbers, phone on a stack of books 6-8 inches high. FOCUSED. __________________ I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!

25 January 2020, 07:04 PM	#14
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Based on this one poor picture, I say not genuine. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

25 January 2020, 03:58 AM	#2
stmoore Banned Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: US Watch: Gilt Posts: 1,592	Well you covered up the 5 - this doesn't help. At a quick glance it's a 3.3 or the last of the MK3. On what year of watch is it going? As an example, I expect a 1665 rail dial to have a 3.3 insert on it (it's a 5.7ish million watch), so about 1978.

25 January 2020, 05:52 AM	#7
Carnauba "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: France Posts: 4	before saying unpleasant words! I want to tell you that this is not my pic !!! it is t the seller photo !!!

25 January 2020, 07:40 AM	#10
42itus "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Real Name: Tom Location: Honolulu Watch: 116519LN Posts: 3,828	I'm far from an expert but that fade does not look good. Does seeing the back of it help?

25 January 2020, 10:18 AM	#11
1665fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: East coast Posts: 6,660	Artificial fade for sure.....fade just around the edge is a tell sign

25 January 2020, 03:36 PM	#12
onthedial "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Los Angeles Watch: IG @onthedial Posts: 587	@Carnauba Strategically bad (seller) pics. Walk away. ———— IG: @onthedial Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

25 January 2020, 07:38 PM	#15
swatty 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: The Game Posts: 17,415	The seller only sent you one pic ? Not looking good, many red flags

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)