ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 June 2021, 09:48 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Asia
Posts: 69
|
Metas Certification and Milgauss
Some musings from a discussion with fellow enthusiasts:
Now that Tudor has its METAS certification, it is unlikely that Rolex will adopt it -- it cannot be seen for Rolex to "stoop" down to the Tudor/Omega level. However, the METAS certification is the anti-magnetic certification -- it makes sense for a new version of the "Milgauss" to have undergo METAS testing. Is it completely bonkers to think that the Milgauss will be discontinued by Rolex and re-appear under Tudor with the new METAS movement? |
5 June 2021, 10:07 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,164
|
I feel they'll be separate... or eliminate the MIL in full. Am very much looking fwd to getting Tudor's new METAS timepiece to join the Omega 50th.
__________________
__________________ ----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <---- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133 Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
5 June 2021, 10:11 PM | #3 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,179
|
Quote:
Think the MG will remain on the Rolex catalog, with a movement upgrade at some point (along the AK which shares same case) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
5 June 2021, 10:18 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Asia
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
|
|
6 June 2021, 01:12 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,944
|
I don't see the Milgauss moving to Tudor. I don't recall Tudor having any antimagnetic history, so the model lineage wouldn't make much sense. Ultimately I think this move was about matching Tudor to Omega's level, making Rolex a step above.
__________________
Current Rolex Submariner 126610LN || Cartier Tank Americaine |
6 June 2021, 03:04 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 537
|
“Step above” in what respect? Rolex’s equivalent watch is technically and functionally inferior.
|
6 June 2021, 03:14 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,164
|
Well... ummm... doesn't have date, day, GMT, chrono... So for now just Tudor has METAS only within a basic timekeeper. That's not a complaint, just an observation.
__________________
__________________ ----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <---- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133 Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
6 June 2021, 03:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: California
Posts: 599
|
Who gives a hoot? The milgaus / magnetic rating credentials are far more of a gimmick than helium escape valves.
|
6 June 2021, 04:37 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,545
|
|
6 June 2021, 06:57 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
|
Have to agree to a point regarding the HV most have no idea what its for, or how its used, as today would expect most Rolex watches only see water in the shower or perhaps in the pool. As for anti magnetic properties most all movements made today are mainly made from nickel, brass and beryllium, bronze or Glucydur balance wheels so they were 95% anti-magnetic to begin with, the main culprit in getting magnetised is the hairspring making it stick together. And even with the older Nivarox hairsprings used in Rolex for 40 plus years, they had to meet the Swiss standard for anti-magnetic watches, which is to withstand a strong magnetic field of 4800 Amps per meter. Even your own body puts out a magnetic field same for every electrical devise in your home. Now I would never put any mechanical watch directly on any powerful magnet thats common sense as everyone should know. And if any did get magnetised its quite a simple process to de-magnetise. But today there is a syndrome that being more magnetic rating, or higher W/R rating, bigger,or heavier its automatically better, and many today buy just because of this.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
6 June 2021, 04:45 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 647
|
One can hope that this will be the end of the Rolex gimmick.
|
6 June 2021, 05:15 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
Mil-Gauss meaning 1000 gauss. I could care less. I love mine and if I were a movement whore I would only keep my VC. The 3131 however is the smoothest winding of all Rolex I've ever owned and keeps cosc time. I've been a Milgauss fan since I first saw them, my first being a black non gv and now looking to add a black gv to my Zblue. Long Live the Milgauss! If not I'll have mine..
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
6 June 2021, 06:39 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Ireland
Posts: 327
|
Quote:
|
|
6 June 2021, 05:28 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
|
From my understanding the name Milgauss is only a name. The watch is actually more capable. See the Hodinkee article!!!
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-...odymium-magnet |
6 June 2021, 10:01 PM | #15 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,752
|
Quote:
|
|
7 June 2021, 01:09 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
|
15 July 2021, 10:27 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
I just got a white milgauss and I have to agree with this statement. The 3131 movement is the smoothest wind I’ve ever experienced. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 June 2021, 06:10 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,688
|
Metas Certification and Milgauss
Milgauss needs to go anti mag movement, drop the faraday cage nonsense, incorporate a date, maybe a timing bezel. But then it’s just a sub date for use on dry land. I think it’s time has passed. To the scrap heap with you just like the turnograph and AirKing!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 June 2021, 07:02 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
My Seamaster300 has 15 x the anti-magnetic protection of the Milgauss. Does it make it any more desirable in the real world or 15 x more useful?
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
7 June 2021, 12:40 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
The Milgauss already has magnetic protection far exceeding its listed 1000 gauss. With the parachrom blue hairspring and the faraday cage Hodinkee tested the Milgauss to do everything Omega's 15000 gauss rated movement did. Including withstanding fields at many thousands of gauss. I believe the industrial magnet they used in the test was 8000 gauss, though it has been a number of years since I've read.
I expect to see the new movement combined with an improved and/or more modern faraday cage. Perhaps in a very unique material such as carbon fiber for the faraday that will ultimately allow the watch to be much lighter than the current Milgauss. |
7 June 2021, 03:17 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: FL
Watch: OP41 Silver
Posts: 1,817
|
I think they will discontinue the MG and AK for a handful of years and bring them back with new design language around 2030
|
7 June 2021, 05:17 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: FL
Watch: OP41 Silver
Posts: 1,817
|
I'd like to see them drop the "Superlative Chronometer" thing and just make all their watches METAS+ quality and don't mention it on the dial. That understated quality thing is a + in my book.
|
7 June 2021, 05:22 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
Just my opinion but I think Rolex's own Superlative Chronometer rating already gives watch owners as much benefit. Nothing that is rated a Superlative Chronometer by Rolex that can't handle 99.9% of life's craziness.
|
16 July 2021, 12:20 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Jan
Location: Earth
Posts: 381
|
Rolex has been testing syloxi hair spring in lady DJ models for a while. They will update the Milgauss movement with syloxi and voila, you have an a-magnetic watch. Rolex is going through COSC that is "Chronometer" , but then they do their own testing after casing and that is "Superlative Chronometer". If Rolex ever decides to get METAS, I am sure they will add their additional testing on the top to keep it exclusive to the brand although not needed.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.