|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
14 June 2021, 09:23 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 39
|
114060 Vs. 116710 Lugs
Noob question here, but do the lugs of 114060 and 116710 have different width? If they’re different, how much of a difference? I do have a BLNR from 2018 and I think the lugs are perfect.
|
|
|
|
14 June 2021, 09:33 PM
|
#2 | |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,182
|
Quote:
114060 lugs are a bit thicker versus the 116710; the current 124060 lugs are similar to the 116710 from what have read Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
|
|
|
|
15 June 2021, 04:27 AM
|
#3 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
|
Quote:
IMHO, I think the 116710 lug width is a lot closer to the actual width of 114060 lugs compared to the 124060. |
|
|
|
|
|
15 June 2021, 12:32 AM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: here AND there...
Posts: 2,240
|
I love the 'fat boy' zero six zero.
|
|
|
|
|
15 June 2021, 02:01 AM
|
#5 |
|
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,263
|
The difference isn’t that great.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
15 June 2021, 03:59 AM
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK / EU & Canada
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,349
|
Lugs on the 114060 are definitely more noticeable, after wearing for one year now I prefer it to the skinnier lugs.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
