ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
20 June 2021, 09:14 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,165
|
Day Date 36 turquoise dial
Kind of intrigued by this dial.
Don't see much love for it here-or even mention. Any thoughts would be appreciated. 2 questions in particular: 1. I would "imagine" that at 44k this dial would not be something dealers try the same song and dance bullcrap tactics they use on the stainless watches? 2. As someone who wore a 36 DJ (TT naturally) for 15 years I think the bracelet was the TINIEST tighter than my current OP41. May be placebo effect! Are 36 Rolexes, as made today, less in terms of circumference, if that is the proper term, than the 40's? I have an average sized wrist. Never had it measured! |
20 June 2021, 10:24 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,149
|
Day Date 36 turquoise dial
I’ve tried this reference on in person with both the standard fluted bezel and with the diamond bezel while I was in Cairo at the Four Seasons. The details of the dial are incredible. If someone prefers a classic sized watch this is a great option.
I’m not sure I understand your last question. The DD36 is indeed smaller than the DD40. |
20 June 2021, 11:58 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
|
|
20 June 2021, 01:51 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: san francisco
Posts: 472
|
Day Date 36 turquoise dial
Quote:
You can add(buy) or remove as many links as you need to get the perfect fit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex OQ Fanatic SF, CA |
|
20 June 2021, 11:05 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Real Name: Ryan Addison
Location: Anna Maria Island
Watch: 1675 MK1
Posts: 101
|
With a diamond bezel like the one pictured above..it should wear larger than a 36, overall I’d say the modern 36’s are still wearable and my daily is a 99’ 16610 (39mm)
|
20 June 2021, 04:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
|
Isn’t that a woman’s watch?
|
20 June 2021, 04:59 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 473
|
|
20 June 2021, 05:20 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,590
|
|
20 June 2021, 11:44 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,162
|
|
21 June 2021, 01:13 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 473
|
|
21 June 2021, 04:38 AM | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: South Carolina
Watch: 126711CHNR
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
So the diamond numerals are considered feminine. Easy as that... |
|
21 June 2021, 12:47 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,162
|
|
20 June 2021, 05:10 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
|
20 June 2021, 08:53 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,693
|
I wish they made it with just the turquoise sans diamonds. Like the old stone dials from the 80s.
|
21 June 2021, 01:19 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: George
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 216570 Explorer II
Posts: 2,421
|
Not a look I'm fond of. Diamonds on a bezel just don't look right to me. Only my opinion.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.