ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Zed · 28 May 2009, 08:03 PM

I have a limited edition submirsible (Arktos) and i was ready for my 2nd PAM. I was just about to commit for the 233 when i saw the 312.. and now i am baffled.. what to choose.. ???

Trurolexer · 28 May 2009, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zed

I have a limited edition submirsible (Arktos) and i was ready for my 2nd PAM. I was just about to commit for the 233 when i saw the 312.. and now i am baffled.. what to choose.. ???

WELCOME To TRF's PANERAI FORUM!!!

My choice is 233. Why? Because HOT!!!

8 Days with linear indicator & GMT.

312, only 3 Days power reserve.

Zed · 28 May 2009, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trurolexer

WELCOME To TRF's PANERAI FORUM!!!

My choice is 233. Why? Because HOT!!!

8 Days with linear indicator & GMT.

312, only 3 Days power reserve.

Thank you for the welcome and for reducing my anxiety.... i can't wait to have it on my wrist.. already bought the straps before the watch...

Randy · 28 May 2009, 10:57 PM

233 gets my vote, domed crystal, awesome watch!!

B. Doggy · 29 May 2009, 01:32 AM

233 all the way!!

vvk · 29 May 2009, 01:39 AM

233 splendid watch, the first manufacturing calibre, history body 1950.

Bebot · 29 May 2009, 01:42 AM

WELCOME to TRF!!!

I'm on the other side Pam312 simple and also have the in-house movement.

Nica64 · 29 May 2009, 10:01 AM

233

JF23 · 29 May 2009, 11:53 AM

I'm all over the 233 bandwagon as well...

Welcome!

jay_kay · 29 May 2009, 03:04 PM

I am on the 312 side, plus with the money you save you can buy another Panerai!!!

J

VazLube · 30 May 2009, 02:47 AM

A proper comparison would be 320. Which is 312 with GMT hand and PR at back. 312 doesn't have GMT hand.

Choosing between 312 and 233, depends on preference and budget. For me, 233 no question.

The more proper question should be asked: 104 or 312?

robertino233 · 30 May 2009, 07:24 AM

233 No brainer !!!!

Zed · 30 May 2009, 06:23 PM

Thank you guys..., my mind is made up... 233 it is... i will be posting the pics as soon as i recieve it..
the only thing that attracted ne to the 312 was that it is sandwiched dial (same as 233 which i lobve) and it is slightly domed which makes it a bit more elegant.. but falling in love with 233 came out unscaved.
I am excited.. ARKTOS + 233... whant is next??? maybe a radomire...

hahahah

argee1977 · 30 May 2009, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zed

Thank you guys..., my mind is made up... 233 it is... i will be posting the pics as soon as i recieve it..
the only thing that attracted ne to the 312 was that it is sandwiched dial (same as 233 which i lobve) and it is slightly domed which makes it a bit more elegant.. but falling in love with 233 came out unscaved.
I am excited.. ARKTOS + 233... whant is next??? maybe a radomire...

hahahah

Ah, the 233, what is there not to love

tech_controller · 31 May 2009, 11:48 AM

233 for me...

hflee55 · 1 June 2009, 10:14 AM

233!

Asad · 1 June 2009, 06:32 PM

For functionality the 233 or if you want the simplicity that every PAM offers the 312.

28 May 2009, 08:03 PM	#1
Zed Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: UK Watch: Panerai 186 & 233 Posts: 489	233 or 312 ???? I need help deciding I have a limited edition submirsible (Arktos) and i was ready for my 2nd PAM. I was just about to commit for the 233 when i saw the 312.. and now i am baffled.. what to choose.. ???

29 May 2009, 01:32 AM	#5
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	233 all the way!! __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

29 May 2009, 10:01 AM	#8
Nica64 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,596	233 __________________ ______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.

29 May 2009, 03:04 PM	#10
jay_kay "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Barrowford Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54 Posts: 1,699	I am on the 312 side, plus with the money you save you can buy another Panerai!!! J __________________ Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1

31 May 2009, 11:48 AM	#15
tech_controller "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Daniel Location: Middle Earth Watch: Me Bleed... Posts: 687	233 for me... __________________ 126711CHNR \| 326935 \| 11613 black \| 11613 serti \| 16610 \| 116660 \| 116610LV \| 116713LN 116519 panda \| 116710LN \| 116713LB \| 116713LB diamond

28 May 2009, 10:57 PM	#4
Randy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Randy Location: Ohio Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai Posts: 1,241	233 gets my vote, domed crystal, awesome watch!!

29 May 2009, 01:39 AM	#6
vvk "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Russia Posts: 1	233 splendid watch, the first manufacturing calibre, history body 1950.

29 May 2009, 01:42 AM	#7
Bebot "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Emil Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: U macallit Posts: 2,645	WELCOME to TRF!!! I'm on the other side Pam312 simple and also have the in-house movement.

29 May 2009, 11:53 AM	#9
JF23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: S Florida Posts: 1,899	I'm all over the 233 bandwagon as well... Welcome!

30 May 2009, 02:47 AM	#11
VazLube Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: South of Equator Posts: 278	A proper comparison would be 320. Which is 312 with GMT hand and PR at back. 312 doesn't have GMT hand. Choosing between 312 and 233, depends on preference and budget. For me, 233 no question. The more proper question should be asked: 104 or 312?

30 May 2009, 07:24 AM	#12
robertino233 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: ny Posts: 31	233 No brainer !!!!

30 May 2009, 06:23 PM	#13
Zed Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: UK Watch: Panerai 186 & 233 Posts: 489	Thank you guys..., my mind is made up... 233 it is... i will be posting the pics as soon as i recieve it.. the only thing that attracted ne to the 312 was that it is sandwiched dial (same as 233 which i lobve) and it is slightly domed which makes it a bit more elegant.. but falling in love with 233 came out unscaved. I am excited.. ARKTOS + 233... whant is next??? maybe a radomire... hahahah

1 June 2009, 10:14 AM	#16
hflee55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Andy Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY Watch: Me Watching You!! Posts: 3,260	233!

1 June 2009, 06:32 PM	#17
Asad "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Stillwater, OK Posts: 96	For functionality the 233 or if you want the simplicity that every PAM offers the 312.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)