The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 October 2021, 01:57 AM   #1
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Rolex’s power and influence reach terrifying levels, Watchfinder survey finds

Rolex’s power and influence reach terrifying levels

It will come as no surprise to anybody in the industry that, when asked to name a watch brand they would most like on their wrist, the majority named Rolex.

The scale of the Rolex appeal should be deeply troubling to every other brand because, when 55% want the crown, that leaves hundreds of other watchmakers fighting for the other 45%.

The survey was carried out by Richemont’s Watchfinder & Co., which asked over 20,000 watch lovers, from over 140 countries, to name their dream watch.

Rolex dominated the responses, not only as a brand but also as the most popular watch with its Daytona chronograph, particularly the ref. 116506, the 50th anniversary Daytona model made in platinum (pictured top).

It has a retail price of £59,600, but is now routinely offered for three times that price on the secondary market.

Patek Philippe was the second most popular watch brand, accounting for 12.5% of the votes, and Omega came in third place with 6.7%.

Audemars Piguet scooped fourth place.

Disappointing to Richemont, since it ultimately funded the study, was the discovery that only A. Lange & Söhne from its stable made the top five.

Breitling was at number six, and then Richemont’s Jaeger-LeCoultre, Vacheron Constantin, Cartier and IWC made up the rest of the top ten.

When it came to the most wanted watch model, six of the top ten were from Rolex.

More than 16% of survey respondents named a Rolex Daytona as their number one pick.

In second place was the Rolex Submariner with 12.4% of the votes.

Patek Philippe’s Nautilus came in third with 6.2%, followed by Rolex’s GMT-Master with 5.1% and Rolex Datejust at 4.9%.

Audemars Piguet’s Royal Oak crept into the top five with 3.9% listing the famous Gerald Genta designed watch. The rest of the top ten were:

Rolex Oyster Perpetual (3.7%)
Patek Philippe Complication (3.5%)
Rolex Day Date (3.5%)
Omega Speedmaster (3.3%)

Arjen Van de Vall, CEO of Watchfinder & Co., remarks: “Steel sports watches continue to stand the test of time so it was little surprise to see a Daytona at the top of this years ‘most wanted’ list. The platinum Oyster Perpetual Cosmograph, which proved to be the most wanted of all Daytona references, became an instant collectors piece when it was launched in 2013. Demand for this timepiece has continued to outweigh supply ever since and currently the watch is near on impossible to buy new.

“And this is where buying pre-owned really comes into its own; providing watch buyers with unprecedented access to those hard to get pieces – whether that’s a vintage or limited edition, a cult classic that has been discontinued or, of course, a current best seller that is impossible to access new due to impenetrable and lengthy waiting lists. The length and breadth of choice in the luxury watch sector has never been greater and each year more and more watch enthusiasts are recognising trusted pre-owned specialists as the best route to accessing more of this stock.”

Watchfinder’s survey also asked about behavioral issues when it comes to watch research and shopping.

Interestingly, social media and influencers were less powerful than some may assume.

Twice as many people first came across their dream watch on the wrist of someone they know rather than seeing it on the wrist of a celebrity or an influencer. 24% of people first discovered their dream watch in a physical boutique, 20% saw it in editorial and 16% discovered it whilst online shopping online.

The emotional impact of wearing a dream watch was enormous, with 93.8% of respondents believing that wearing their dream watch would positively impact their confidence.

One in three said wearing their dream watch would make them feel successful, wealthy and accomplished and almost one third said wearing their dream watch would make them feel more suave, sophisticated or elegant.

Only 25% of those surveyed selected their dream watch because they considered it a sound investment.

https://usa.watchpro.com/rolexs-powe...ifying-levels/
vh2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 02:03 AM   #2
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
Wow……..Thanks for sharing, glad I have my daytonas already lol
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 02:06 AM   #3
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
Talking their own Bob. Lol.

Survey methodology: all employees? Hahaha
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 03:04 AM   #4
Lesnerelli23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 871
Quote:
Originally Posted by macrowatch View Post
Talking their own Bob. Lol.

Survey methodology: all employees? Hahaha
This.

There’s so many biases going on in this poll that skew the results.
Lesnerelli23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 02:08 AM   #5
Choo Yao Chuen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 518
Please tell me something I don't already know��
Choo Yao Chuen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 02:34 AM   #6
Keepchasing
"TRF" Member
 
Keepchasing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 645
Thanks for sharing!
Keepchasing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 02:37 AM   #7
Seddyspaghetti
"TRF" Member
 
Seddyspaghetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,789
Thanks for sharing
Seddyspaghetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 02:41 AM   #8
Laszlo
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,868
Pretty darn impressive Omega is 3rd. That's a big deal IMO.
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die."

Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca
Laszlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 03:01 AM   #9
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laszlo View Post
Pretty darn impressive Omega is 3rd. That's a big deal IMO.
Watchfinder's business is pre-owned and Omega has so many great models available at reasonable secondary prices... so, it makes sense.
vh2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 03:42 AM   #10
Fleetlord
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,023
Interesting article.

His comments about the platinum Daytona are incorrect. That reference was selling for well under retail and was readily available from AD until a couple of years ago...so demand was NOT exceeding supply since it came out. It certainly is now. Times are much different now, as is supply...

That being said, I think that their survey is also not reflective of the overall market, in which my opinion is that it is an even higher share for Rolex than any other brand.

Rolex is absolutely and completely dominant in the luxury watch space. Other brands have some traction among the well healed, such as AP, Patek, RM, FPJ...etc. BUT overall all ROLEX is so incredibly dominant that I see it crippling other brands...

Case in point. Omega had a lovely company owned boutique in Aventura mall in Miami. It is now permanently closed.

Rolex just EXPANDED their location with Mayors in the same mall to INCREASE their presence.

I've seen this in Palm Beach as well. Omega boutique has come and gone, but Tourneau had no issue expanding their Rolex section.

These are affluent and luxury watch friendly markets. Omega had no chance against the crown and had to get out of dodge.

I think a lot of independent jewelry stores will simply stop selling (Non-ROLEX, AP, Patek) luxury watches out of their stores because the carrying costs of the "weaker" brands are simply too high (SWATCH and Richemont CRANK out watches and force dealers to BUY MORE as that's how they hit their numbers). They just don't sell and it's too much inventory to hold for items that don't draw people into the store.

Those weaker brands will be FORCED to shift completely to Ecommerce and company boutiques in select major cities, as those company owned channels will essentially be their only option to go to market. Even then, they will need to carefully pick their spots as I detailed earlier, going H2H with Rolex, with a factory store, can still lead to complete failure.

This is real problem for these other brands. They have some VERY important decisions to make and strategies to implement in order to survive. The overall market CLEARLY has little to no interest in the product they are currently producing and distributing. That is not a good place to be in a "booming" luxury goods environment.
Fleetlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 04:33 AM   #11
vh2k
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
His comments about the platinum Daytona are incorrect. That reference was selling for well under retail and was readily available from AD until a couple of years ago...so demand was NOT exceeding supply since it came out. It certainly is now. Times are much different now, as is supply...
Market "research" always has an agenda - in this case, continue the hype train on hot watches in the secondary market. No surprise the narrative is consistent with that.
vh2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 04:45 AM   #12
TimepieceRPP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Interesting article.

His comments about the platinum Daytona are incorrect. That reference was selling for well under retail and was readily available from AD until a couple of years ago...so demand was NOT exceeding supply since it came out. It certainly is now. Times are much different now, as is supply...

That being said, I think that their survey is also not reflective of the overall market, in which my opinion is that it is an even higher share for Rolex than any other brand.

Rolex is absolutely and completely dominant in the luxury watch space. Other brands have some traction among the well healed, such as AP, Patek, RM, FPJ...etc. BUT overall all ROLEX is so incredibly dominant that I see it crippling other brands...

Case in point. Omega had a lovely company owned boutique in Aventura mall in Miami. It is now permanently closed.

Rolex just EXPANDED their location with Mayors in the same mall to INCREASE their presence.

I've seen this in Palm Beach as well. Omega boutique has come and gone, but Tourneau had no issue expanding their Rolex section.

These are affluent and luxury watch friendly markets. Omega had no chance against the crown and had to get out of dodge.

I think a lot of independent jewelry stores will simply stop selling (Non-ROLEX, AP, Patek) luxury watches out of their stores because the carrying costs of the "weaker" brands are simply too high (SWATCH and Richemont CRANK out watches and force dealers to BUY MORE as that's how they hit their numbers). They just don't sell and it's too much inventory to hold for items that don't draw people into the store.

Those weaker brands will be FORCED to shift completely to Ecommerce and company boutiques in select major cities, as those company owned channels will essentially be their only option to go to market. Even then, they will need to carefully pick their spots as I detailed earlier, going H2H with Rolex, with a factory store, can still lead to complete failure.

This is real problem for these other brands. They have some VERY important decisions to make and strategies to implement in order to survive. The overall market CLEARLY has little to no interest in the product they are currently producing and distributing. That is not a good place to be in a "booming" luxury goods environment.
Agree. It sat in the display window often before 2016. Since the Brexit GBP depreciation, Rolexes have became hard to get because of cheap pounds attract loads of tourists to buy it.

I always found platona stunning but couldn't afford at that time. Not to even mention now, haha.
TimepieceRPP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 04:48 AM   #13
Robf52
"TRF" Member
 
Robf52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sunshine State
Watch: lots of Rolex
Posts: 5,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Interesting article.

His comments about the platinum Daytona are incorrect. That reference was selling for well under retail and was readily available from AD until a couple of years ago...so demand was NOT exceeding supply since it came out. It certainly is now. Times are much different now, as is supply...

That being said, I think that their survey is also not reflective of the overall market, in which my opinion is that it is an even higher share for Rolex than any other brand.

Rolex is absolutely and completely dominant in the luxury watch space. Other brands have some traction among the well healed, such as AP, Patek, RM, FPJ...etc. BUT overall all ROLEX is so incredibly dominant that I see it crippling other brands...

Case in point. Omega had a lovely company owned boutique in Aventura mall in Miami. It is now permanently closed.

Rolex just EXPANDED their location with Mayors in the same mall to INCREASE their presence.

I've seen this in Palm Beach as well. Omega boutique has come and gone, but Tourneau had no issue expanding their Rolex section.

These are affluent and luxury watch friendly markets. Omega had no chance against the crown and had to get out of dodge.

I think a lot of independent jewelry stores will simply stop selling (Non-ROLEX, AP, Patek) luxury watches out of their stores because the carrying costs of the "weaker" brands are simply too high (SWATCH and Richemont CRANK out watches and force dealers to BUY MORE as that's how they hit their numbers). They just don't sell and it's too much inventory to hold for items that don't draw people into the store.

Those weaker brands will be FORCED to shift completely to Ecommerce and company boutiques in select major cities, as those company owned channels will essentially be their only option to go to market. Even then, they will need to carefully pick their spots as I detailed earlier, going H2H with Rolex, with a factory store, can still lead to complete failure.

This is real problem for these other brands. They have some VERY important decisions to make and strategies to implement in order to survive. The overall market CLEARLY has little to no interest in the product they are currently producing and distributing. That is not a good place to be in a "booming" luxury goods environment.
All good points well said.
__________________
126610LV//116508 Daytona YG Black/Champagne
116655 YM40 Everose Oysterflex//126622 YM40 Blue//126600 SD43
126710BLNR//126711CHNR
126334 DJ41 Rhodium/Diamonds//126331 DJ41 TT Wimbledon
124300 OP41 Green//126334 DJ41Mint Green
Robf52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 06:59 AM   #14
Tavli3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: miami
Watch: GMT II 16760
Posts: 1,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Interesting article.

His comments about the platinum Daytona are incorrect. That reference was selling for well under retail and was readily available from AD until a couple of years ago...so demand was NOT exceeding supply since it came out. It certainly is now. Times are much different now, as is supply...

That being said, I think that their survey is also not reflective of the overall market, in which my opinion is that it is an even higher share for Rolex than any other brand.

Rolex is absolutely and completely dominant in the luxury watch space. Other brands have some traction among the well healed, such as AP, Patek, RM, FPJ...etc. BUT overall all ROLEX is so incredibly dominant that I see it crippling other brands...

Case in point. Omega had a lovely company owned boutique in Aventura mall in Miami. It is now permanently closed.

Rolex just EXPANDED their location with Mayors in the same mall to INCREASE their presence.

I've seen this in Palm Beach as well. Omega boutique has come and gone, but Tourneau had no issue expanding their Rolex section.

These are affluent and luxury watch friendly markets. Omega had no chance against the crown and had to get out of dodge.

I think a lot of independent jewelry stores will simply stop selling (Non-ROLEX, AP, Patek) luxury watches out of their stores because the carrying costs of the "weaker" brands are simply too high (SWATCH and Richemont CRANK out watches and force dealers to BUY MORE as that's how they hit their numbers). They just don't sell and it's too much inventory to hold for items that don't draw people into the store.

Those weaker brands will be FORCED to shift completely to Ecommerce and company boutiques in select major cities, as those company owned channels will essentially be their only option to go to market. Even then, they will need to carefully pick their spots as I detailed earlier, going H2H with Rolex, with a factory store, can still lead to complete failure.

This is real problem for these other brands. They have some VERY important decisions to make and strategies to implement in order to survive. The overall market CLEARLY has little to no interest in the product they are currently producing and distributing. That is not a good place to be in a "booming" luxury goods environment.

Omega’s downfall at the mall was twofold. 1 the store was huge, 5 times the size of Mayor’s Rolex store with 20 different variations of the same Speedmaster. Confusing buyers and making buying decisions difficult. So they had 5 times the space 20 times the watches and 1% as many customers as Rolex had.

Second, they were not allowed to discount. So they were always 20-25% higher than what you could buy online for. Tough to stay in business with that business plan.

Was friendly with two of the SAs there who both left cause they weren’t making any money. Smart move on their part since the store is no longer in existence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tavli3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 08:08 AM   #15
bob sims
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tavli3 View Post
So they had 5 times the space 20 times the watches and 1% as many customers as Rolex had.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Omega-you SUCK
bob sims is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 08:24 AM   #16
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed reading it.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 09:37 AM   #17
T4ME
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singslinger View Post
Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed reading it.
x2
T4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 08:28 AM   #18
RolexSimon
"TRF" Member
 
RolexSimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob sims View Post

Omega-you SUCK
Just try and get a silver snoopy :-)
RolexSimon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 03:53 PM   #19
Cauhauna
"TRF" Member
 
Cauhauna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Cau
Location: Peachtree City
Watch: 116500
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob sims View Post

Omega-you SUCK
I agree. Their watches are cool
The endless supply makes them undesirable to me
Cauhauna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 11:27 PM   #20
Francist
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Singapore
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cauhauna View Post
I agree. Their watches are cool
The endless supply makes them undesirable to me
I like their watches too, especially the Seamasters line.
That is until I went to Japan and saw they were discounted 40-60% in Bic Camera. There was no difference between those packed Omegas & a can of sardine. They had Rolex too but was on sale for above msrp. This was in 2017.

The issue of over-supply will kill any luxury brand.
Francist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 04:25 AM   #21
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
Nice read, thanks for sharing
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 04:59 AM   #22
Timetracker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 178
‘Terrifying’ levels?……….a tad dramatic when discussing anything to do with a watch, don’t you think?��*♂️
Timetracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 08:27 AM   #23
envuks
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
envuks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timetracker View Post
‘Terrifying’ levels?……….a tad dramatic when discussing anything to do with a watch, don’t you think?��*

Well, to the consumer yes.

However, if you’re a watch company providing for the livelihoods of hundreds or thousands of employees and their families through your business terrifying may be the proper word....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Current watches: 116718ln, 116500 black dial, 40mm Breitling Chronomat MOP dial

“A man with one watch always knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.”
envuks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 11:05 PM   #24
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timetracker View Post
‘Terrifying’ levels?……….a tad dramatic when discussing anything to do with a watch, don’t you think?��*♂️
Indeed.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2021, 11:06 AM   #25
NiJaRo1225
"TRF" Member
 
NiJaRo1225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: U.S.
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timetracker View Post
‘Terrifying’ levels?……….a tad dramatic when discussing anything to do with a watch, don’t you think?

Lol, exactly my thought.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NiJaRo1225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 05:05 AM   #26
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,126
Thanks for the article
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 05:10 AM   #27
WestCoastS
"TRF" Member
 
WestCoastS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 541
good post!
__________________
Submariner 116613LB Blusey
Sky Dweller TT Black Dial
DD 40 Silver Dial on [[[Yellow Gold]]]
WestCoastS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 06:06 AM   #28
alphadweller
"TRF" Member
 
alphadweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,198
Thanks for sharing.
alphadweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 08:33 AM   #29
Lu..
"TRF" Member
 
Lu..'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: NJ
Watch: 224270 Exp I 40mm
Posts: 248
not surprised about Rolex, but I would've thought Omega would be second vs Patek...then I read that this survey was based on "20K watch lovers".....

wonder what the second brand would be from random 20K from the street.....pretty sure the Sub would overtake the Daytona as #1.
__________________
♛ Explorer 224270
Ω Moonwatch 3861 Sapphire
🛡️ Black Bay Pro m79470-0001
Lu.. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2021, 08:35 AM   #30
Tavli3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: miami
Watch: GMT II 16760
Posts: 1,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lu.. View Post
not surprised about Rolex, but I would've thought Omega would be second vs Patek...then I read that this survey was based on "20K watch lovers".....

wonder what the second brand would be from random 20K from the street.....pretty sure the Sub would overtake the Daytona as #1.

If it was 20k of non watch lovers I doubt it would be a Rolex


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tavli3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.