The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 June 2009, 03:17 AM   #1
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Positioning for accuracy

Ok, someone help me please....

This is related to a recent post about accuracy. Somone was not satisfied with their Rolex (I think it was a GMT) even though it was in COSC limits, and several of you guys that are more intagnl- intelgin- intalgint- SMARTER then me offered suggestions on how he could speed up or slow down the movement by the position he placed the watch in at night.

My Daytona was running over +10 sec a day, so I had it regulated and it is now at about +3. I am completely satisfied with this, but thought if it really made a difference, why not put it in the proper position that would slow it down at night, and make it even more accurate. Right now, I just toss (not literally of course) it on the night stand and whichever position it was in stayed there until morning. So, I asked: "Which position should I place the watch in to slow it down?" (I think it was) Larry, said placing it on it's side, crown up, would acomplish this. I was already to try it when I got another 5,297 PMs from TRFers, telling me up, down, on it's back, at a 47 degree angle to the moon, put it in the freezer, microwave, flush a toilet near it before you go to bed so the vortex of the swirling motion... etc. etc. etc. Although I am open minded, the one about holding the watch in my left hand, standing on one leg, facing East and howling at North star over my right shoulder was a bit much... So...

Can anyone verify, (if it's even true by the way), which particular position placing my Dayton in on the dresser at night would slow the movement down?

Thanks, and as always, Love Live the JJ!
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 03:41 AM   #2
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
Every watch has its own quirks, the best thing to do is test the watch nightly and see what position slows it down or speeds it up.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 03:47 AM   #3
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Ok, someone help me please....

This is related to a recent post about accuracy. Somone was not satisfied with their Rolex (I think it was a GMT) even though it was in COSC limits, and several of you guys that are more intagnl- intelgin- intalgint- SMARTER then me offered suggestions on how he could speed up or slow down the movement by the position he placed the watch in at night.

My Daytona was running over +10 sec a day, so I had it regulated and it is now at about +3. I am completely satisfied with this, but thought if it really made a difference, why not put it in the proper position that would slow it down at night, and make it even more accurate. Right now, I just toss (not literally of course) it on the night stand and whichever position it was in stayed there until morning. So, I asked: "Which position should I place the watch in to slow it down?" (I think it was) Larry, said placing it on it's side, crown up, would acomplish this. I was already to try it when I got another 5,297 PMs from TRFers, telling me up, down, on it's back, at a 47 degree angle to the moon, put it in the freezer, microwave, flush a toilet near it before you go to bed so the vortex of the swirling motion... etc. etc. etc. Although I am open minded, the one about holding the watch in my left hand, standing on one leg, facing East and howling at North star over my right shoulder was a bit much... So...

Can anyone verify, (if it's even true by the way), which particular position placing my Dayton in on the dresser at night would slow the movement down?

Thanks, and as always, Love Live the JJ!
Myself plus a few others have posted this many times in forum.But for just +3 seconds why bother just hack a re-set it once a week.

__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 10:49 PM   #4
frank gama
"TRF" Member
 
frank gama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: ExhibitionOnly
Location: Earth
Posts: 331
is position "4" the default position then?

Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Myself plus a few others have posted this many times in forum.But for just +3 seconds why bother just hack a re-set it once a week.

Interesting the leaflet describes positions 1 , 2 and 3 to gain a few seconds, lose a few seconds and lose more than a few seconds resp. This then leaves us with position 4 ie dial/crystal down which they dont mention. Does this imply that the crystal down is the default or neutral position that every one else whos happy with their accuracy is supposed to leave their watches in?
frank gama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 09:10 AM   #5
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
That was perfect PADI, many thanks to the TRF Executive Officer!

I agree 3 secs a day is more then acceptable, but what the heck? If by placing it in a certain postion every night I can get it spot on, why not try it?
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 09:44 AM   #6
Imtiaz
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: De
Location: Tokyo
Watch: Daytona, Sub, DS,
Posts: 1,046
Paul, does 3 seconds really bother you?

Here, where the bullet trains leave and arrive 800 kM later at the exact minute, we still tolerate a few seconds a day.

The Daytona is an exceptional watch. Enjoy it.
Imtiaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 09:54 AM   #7
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imtiaz View Post
Paul, does 3 seconds really bother you?

Here, where the bullet trains leave and arrive 800 kM later at the exact minute, we still tolerate a few seconds a day.

The Daytona is an exceptional watch. Enjoy it.
I thought you were going to give me one of those algebra questions...

"Train A leaves the station heading East at 59 Miles per Hour, Train B leaves the same station... blah blah blah... ?"
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 10:59 AM   #8
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Can anyone verify, (if it's even true by the way), which particular position placing my Dayton in on the dresser at night would slow the movement down? thumbsup:

No problem, mi Amigo. Place it in a FedEx pouch and send it up to me. I'll make sure it runs within COSC specs for a couple of years or so then I'll ship it back.
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 06:07 AM   #9
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcan View Post
No problem, mi Amigo. Place it in a FedEx pouch and send it up to me. I'll make sure it runs within COSC specs for a couple of years or so then I'll ship it back.
Thanks for the help Al... I really appreciate it. You should have it in a couple days...

TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2009, 10:17 PM   #10
f16570
"TRF" Member
 
f16570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
The accuracy is not the issue, for me it is the fact that something mechanical can be, when regulated so damn accurate. AMAZING.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best.
f
f16570 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 01:37 AM   #11
Mathemagician
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: JJ
Location: PA
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 83
Crystal down is very fast.
Mathemagician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 02:12 AM   #12
al_bongo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
My 14060M doesn't seem to be greatly affected one way or another by any of these positons.
al_bongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 02:28 AM   #13
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by al_bongo View Post
My 14060M doesn't seem to be greatly affected one way or another by any of these positons.
Quite true most of the hi beat movements 28800 BPH today are not so effected,but some will pull back or lose a second or so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathemagician View Post
Crystal down is very fast.
Would hardly call it very fast but in the dial down position
movement would tent to gain the most, but we are talking about a few seconds no more.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 03:24 AM   #14
pdmlynek
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 28
Please forgive my ignorance (I am still pretty new to this Rolex world), but a little bit on an anal retentive tangent: Isn’t the proper term for how well a watch keeps time called the PRECISION of a watch instead of the ACCURACY of a watch? The latter term I think describes how closely the watch tells the actual time, which is a totally different concept from precision. Or are these used interchangeably in the watch universe?
pdmlynek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 04:29 AM   #15
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdmlynek View Post
Please forgive my ignorance (I am still pretty new to this Rolex world), but a little bit on an anal retentive tangent: Isn’t the proper term for how well a watch keeps time called the PRECISION of a watch instead of the ACCURACY of a watch? The latter term I think describes how closely the watch tells the actual time, which is a totally different concept from precision. Or are these used interchangeably in the watch universe?
Yes.......... most Rolex watches are very precise in that they consistently run at a + or - fugure on a regular basis..

If you have a precise watch, then it is easy to adjust it to some degree of accuracy over time..

But we don't stand on such "correctness" here. We like to think that we are intelligent enough to understand what our members are trying to say given the international flavor of the boards, and the fact that language does not always interchange precisely.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 08:12 AM   #16
frank gama
"TRF" Member
 
frank gama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: ExhibitionOnly
Location: Earth
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdmlynek View Post
Please forgive my ignorance (I am still pretty new to this Rolex world), but a little bit on an anal retentive tangent: Isn’t the proper term for how well a watch keeps time called the PRECISION of a watch instead of the ACCURACY of a watch? The latter term I think describes how closely the watch tells the actual time, which is a totally different concept from precision. Or are these used interchangeably in the watch universe?
I agree with you absolutely. What I was trying to do was improve on the accuracy of the watch by positioning it correctly. Positioning should not affect precision beyond the -4/+6 COSC stipulation.
frank gama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2009, 04:00 AM   #17
Mathemagician
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: JJ
Location: PA
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 83
You are correct on the precision vs. accuracy issue. If this is a cause you are brave enough to take up, it's going to be a very uphill battle.
Mathemagician is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.