ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 January 2022, 01:57 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 279
|
Unpolished lugs
Hey guys I’m a big into modern Rolex but don’t have a whole lot of vintage experience. I definitely trust my dealer as he’s super reputable but just want a second look. These look to me to be unpolished and uncut. What do you guys think? It’s a snowflake sub from the 70s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 January 2022, 02:00 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 279
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 January 2022, 02:16 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 1665,1675,1680,SD4
Posts: 1,837
|
Looks polished / recut. Brushed marks look too new and chamfers too sharp for a 50 year old watch.
This is an example of how wear would look like from the same era. Sent from my SM-G781U1 using Tapatalk |
26 January 2022, 02:33 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
|
|
26 January 2022, 02:36 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,290
|
If you can't tell the difference, maybe it shouldn't matter to you.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
26 January 2022, 03:38 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 279
|
Good point, I still have a lot to learn. Been doing plenty of research so that can actually point out a unpolished or nos piece in the future. I’ve owned a few vintage pieces but all were well polished. Something I couldn’t get over so I sold them. So I’d like to find a really sharp example to keep as an heirloom. Also thanks for the advice fellas.
|
26 January 2022, 05:27 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,652
|
Quote:
Have you tried lunaroyster or Tropical Watches? These guys are top notch. If you’re looking for something unpolished, they will absolutely have it or find it for you. |
|
26 January 2022, 05:33 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
|
40 years old watch and not a mark on it ?
Your seller is living in fairy tale land
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
26 January 2022, 09:03 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
|
26 January 2022, 03:32 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
[QUOTE=WalterW;11951993]Hey guys I’m a big into modern Rolex but don’t have a whole lot of vintage experience. I definitely trust my dealer as he’s super reputable but just want a second look. These look to me to be unpolished and uncut. What do you guys think? It’s a snowflake sub from the 70s
Very thin for original lugs. They've been worked over at some point.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
27 January 2022, 06:10 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,187
|
Yeah, but are we really all caught up in the fact that the dealer said unpolished? Yes it is clearly polished are but the OP has done the right thing here and come to the group for assistance.
"Unpolished" is ubiquitous these days and we all know the likelihood of an unpolished example out there in the wild is very slim on a 40+yr old piece... I say post a comprehensive group of photos and let us just evaluate it. It looks a little thin but not unbuyable from what I see. Price is right could be fine. |
27 January 2022, 09:47 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
Quote:
If he's a proper dealer rather than a random eBay seller, he must know it's been polished and detailed, but is claiming otherwise. That's a dealbreaker right from the start for me regardless of the condition of the watch. Buy the seller. I'm not buying that one. |
|
27 January 2022, 10:44 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
The Tudor Sub lugs, as depicted below, are way over refinished - or polished if you prefer - and not for the faint of heart! I prefer the factory fat lugs(see the 5513 photo below) before they become overly refinished.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
27 January 2022, 12:41 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,290
|
True, very often the refinished cases have overemphasized chamfers.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
30 January 2022, 03:00 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: Augusta Georgia
Watch: 16600
Posts: 1,058
|
That 5513 is where it’s at for me, thanks for your knowledge fellas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.