The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 December 2022, 02:13 AM   #1
Offshore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Feeble lume

Hello - first post.

So, new Explorer 2 (226570)

It's a fantastic watch, The accuracy is out of this world. I've owned it for a month and have not had to alter the second hand yet. It feels great too and it's just the right size for my wrist (which is 7.5 inches)

All good then. Well yes, apart from the feeble lume!

The colour is bright and really pops but it just doesn't last. For comparison I have a Hamilton Khaki Field and I have always been able to see the hands in pitch darkness even after several hours (albeit faintly) With the polar though there is nothing visible if it hasn't seen the light for a while.

It's surprising as the marketing would suggest the opposite!

Any similar experiences? Does the lume need some time to 'run in'? Perhaps the Hamilton just has exceptional lume!
Offshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 02:30 AM   #2
derekhayden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor BBGMT
Posts: 793
On my 126570 the lume didn't last very long either.
__________________
********************************************
Official 2nd Member of The Poor Man's Rolex Club
********************************************
derekhayden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 03:02 AM   #3
Driver8
"TRF" Member
 
Driver8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offshore View Post
Does the lume need some time to 'run in'?
No

Quote:
Originally Posted by Offshore
Perhaps the Hamilton just has exceptional lume!
Maybe it does.
__________________
Rolex - 116710BLNR : 116610LN : 116622 : 116334 : 14060M
(Plus - Glashutte Original, Breitling, Omega, IWC, Tag Heuer, Doxa, Sinn, Seiko, G-Shock + micros)
Driver8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 03:07 AM   #4
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,126
Rolex lume is overstated
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 03:33 AM   #5
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offshore View Post
Hello - first post.

So, new Explorer 2 (226570)

It's a fantastic watch, The accuracy is out of this world. I've owned it for a month and have not had to alter the second hand yet. It feels great too and it's just the right size for my wrist (which is 7.5 inches)

All good then. Well yes, apart from the feeble lume!

The colour is bright and really pops but it just doesn't last. For comparison I have a Hamilton Khaki Field and I have always been able to see the hands in pitch darkness even after several hours (albeit faintly) With the polar though there is nothing visible if it hasn't seen the light for a while.

It's surprising as the marketing would suggest the opposite!

Any similar experiences? Does the lume need some time to 'run in'? Perhaps the Hamilton just has exceptional lume!
OP, welcome to the forum and congrats on the new Exp II. Yes, there are 100s of threads about the seemingly deficient lume chosen by Rolex. Its properties to sustain luminosity has always been a sore point. I have some gym beater dollar seikos and other cheapo watches that trounce Rolex in both the luminosity and duration of their lume. I don’t get it either…I mean surely this lume isn’t an expensive component. Surely, Rolex could either buy or create the worlds most performant lume? Either that or contact Seikos supplier
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 03:46 AM   #6
rmwill
2024 Pledge Member
 
rmwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 907
Lume can be too bright and attention grabbing. I think Rolex got it right on my 226570. I can glance at it on the night stand and see the time perfectly all night. Only I need to see it.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600
Rolex Explorer 224270
Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar
Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich
Panerai PAM00111

2 Factor Authentication
rmwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 03:54 AM   #7
burnthesehills
"TRF" Member
 
burnthesehills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Joe
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,211
I recently posted a thread on this topic. You can search it to review comments on lume.

IMO, Rolex lume is overrated and nothing to write home about. My Breitling was much better in this one area but even then the lume dissipated quickly.

Pretty much across the board with any watch, I have found (non tritium based) lume to be great for about 15 minutes tops. Then it fades and is barely perceptible.

But great watch you have there!
burnthesehills is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 04:07 AM   #8
watch3r
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 189
Whenever I wake up in the night, I can pretty easily tell the time on my 226570. When this comes up, I always have two thoughts:

1) I usually wear it outside for a decent amount during the day, so it gets charged in the sunlight over a long period of time which seems to last longer than a quick "charge" from holding it under a lamp
2) my bedroom is quite dark

I've noticed the hardest setting to tell the time is in situations where there is enough light that my eyes don't adjust, but not enough light to illuminate the face of the watch. If, however, the lume was bright enough to be seen in this setting, I feel like it would be a blinding beacon in a fully dark room.
watch3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 04:32 AM   #9
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
My TAG Heuer Aquaracer has the brightest, longest lasting lume of any watch I've ever owned. None of the Rolexes I have owned come close.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 07:03 AM   #10
Strad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 258
I liked the SuperLuminova more than the Chromolight.
Strad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 07:07 AM   #11
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
We need radioactive lumes back.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 07:19 AM   #12
physicist
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
We need radioactive lumes back.
I totally agree!
physicist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 07:23 AM   #13
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by physicist View Post
I totally agree!
Seriously. What was the big deal? They’re selling watches to people for 300m depths without diving credentials but a Radioactive lume is all a sudden the risk!!!????

Smarten up Rolex!!!
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 12:39 PM   #14
springbar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
Seriously. What was the big deal? They’re selling watches to people for 300m depths without diving credentials but a Radioactive lume is all a sudden the risk!!!????

Smarten up Rolex!!!
Tritium doesn't last long-term. All my tritium Rolexes have dead lume.

Radium has been illegal for sixty years, which is a good thing. It's dangerous and should stay out of the supply chain and waste stream.

Rolex should use whatever magic material Seiko uses. It works.
springbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 12:54 PM   #15
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by springbar View Post
Tritium doesn't last long-term. All my tritium Rolexes have dead lume.
Tritium T100 lasts 50 years. At least. IMHO Rolex ought to figure out a way to incorporate it in a way that works with their aesthetic principles. Yeah, gluing a gas tube onto a hand probably wouldn't cut it but they have some imaginative folks there. Get busy and make it better. It wouldn't matter really but they go on and on about Chromalight, which frankly is no better than any other glow-in-the-dark paint in the industry. It's not like some other player has figured out how to store photons better but the volume of the material does matter.

It's like the "Superb Chronometer" thing. Many, even higher end watches, don't really advertise heavily their accuracy expectations. Rolex does; prints it on every dial. So hit it, no excuses.
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2022, 10:37 AM   #16
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
Seriously. What was the big deal? They’re selling watches to people for 300m depths without diving credentials but a Radioactive lume is all a sudden the risk!!!????

Smarten up Rolex!!!
I suppose all the watchmakers would be thrilled about that in this modern age with the health and safety issues around the better radioactive lumes.
Then there is the radiation burns issues from the hands one can find on the dials of watches after they've been sitting idle in a drawer which is evident on some vintage watches that adds another dimension to interest around patina.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 09:57 AM   #17
Oystersteel92
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: The South, USA
Posts: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
We need radioactive lumes back.
https://shop.ballwatch.ch/en/luminosity

Way cheaper than Rolex. Watches ready to be ordered and shipped ONLINE. No AD games baby!
Oystersteel92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 12:17 PM   #18
DJ2020
"TRF" Member
 
DJ2020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Wayne
Location: NC
Watch: 226570
Posts: 3,484
+1 for the Breitling lume, Mine will dim somewhat in the 1st 30 minutes or so. But then it will hold for hours.
Attached Images
 
__________________
In the end, it's not the years in your life that count.
It's the life in your years. - Abraham Lincoln
__________________________________________________
Rolex 226570, Explorer II Club
DJ2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2022, 03:27 AM   #19
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oystersteel92 View Post
https://shop.ballwatch.ch/en/luminosity

Way cheaper than Rolex. Watches ready to be ordered and shipped ONLINE. No AD games baby!
Honestly not a bad watch but the biggest pita to search for because all you get are literally watches in the shape of balls or website that are nsfw.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 07:21 AM   #20
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
2 Things:
- Tudor Pelagos lume is incredible. Annihilates Rolex lume on all their watches.
- Seiko lume is actually insane and right alongside the Pelagos in brightness/legibility.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 07:34 AM   #21
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offshore View Post
Feeble lume
yes!
said most luminova watches.

with luminova there is only one way to succeed... larger luminescent surface area on the hands (and markers but as the movado museum watch illustrated, there is really no use for the markers in telling time.)

if you are looking for the best options, here are my top three from experience and after owning a 1991 tritium dialed submariner through its extra radioactive visibility period and the following decline.

1)the aquanaut 5167 is my favorite for its incredible lume, especially for such a modest size watch.

2)Panerai: large watches large hands and markers.

3)Tudor: took great design elements of Rolex and in many ways made significant improvements. compare the hand size of a BB58 to a similarly sized modern Submariner and you will instantly understand.
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2022, 02:41 PM   #22
Radbloke
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 220
Frontside or backside?
Radbloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2022, 03:36 AM   #23
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offshore View Post
Hello - first post.

So, new Explorer 2 (226570)

It's a fantastic watch, The accuracy is out of this world. I've owned it for a month and have not had to alter the second hand yet. It feels great too and it's just the right size for my wrist (which is 7.5 inches)

All good then. Well yes, apart from the feeble lume!

The colour is bright and really pops but it just doesn't last. For comparison I have a Hamilton Khaki Field and I have always been able to see the hands in pitch darkness even after several hours (albeit faintly) With the polar though there is nothing visible if it hasn't seen the light for a while.

It's surprising as the marketing would suggest the opposite!

Any similar experiences? Does the lume need some time to 'run in'? Perhaps the Hamilton just has exceptional lume!
The main problems with the lume on Rolex watches the hour plots and hands have quite small surface area compared to many other watches.Small surface area the smaller the glow will seem,larger surface area the greater the glow will seam.But for myself lume glow is far down my list in priority in any watch.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2022, 11:43 AM   #24
Gab27
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
FWIW, I think part of it is the specific color hue of Chromalight.

SuperLuminova C3 has better visibility IMHO, although I like the color hue of Chromalight more.

After around an hour or so in the dark, though, tritium tubes are king.
Gab27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2022, 02:23 PM   #25
faldoc
"TRF" Member
 
faldoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 216
Lume in my SubC seems decent.

About the same brightness as the Super-LumiNova in my Longines Spirit Zulu Time.

My 1986 Rolex 15038 tritium is essentially gone, barely visible in the darkest room with complete dark adaptation. This watch is a dress watch I really don’t rely upon for lume.
faldoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2022, 02:43 PM   #26
Yacht-Master
"TRF" Member
 
Yacht-Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: California
Posts: 55
All my Seiko divers are crazy bright and last all night.

This one is best and stays all night.



All luminova glows bright at first, but dims. The best ones stay lit all night.
Yacht-Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2022, 09:42 PM   #27
Kap007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 116900
Posts: 323
The lume on my 116900 is totally fine. There isn't a lot of it, but it lasts through the night. I hit it with my flashlight on my phone for 90 seconds before I hit the rack. It fades of course, but I'm able to read it throughout the night while it is on my wrist.
Kap007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2022, 12:39 AM   #28
NachoNeal
"TRF" Member
 
NachoNeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,856
I only care about lume when I'm traveling.
And rolex barely gets me through the night with their feeble lume.
__________________
.
Sub No Date (14060); Tudor Ranger; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak.
NachoNeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.