ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 June 2023, 12:26 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Culpeper
Watch: 126613, DJ II
Posts: 40
|
Submariner 41mm 6inch wrist
I’m about to pull the trigger on a new watch, but after more research the new Submariner has a bigger clasp and I’m worried this watch may not fit well or look right on my wrist due to new clasp size. My wrist is only six inches.
I currently wear a DateJust II with a total of 9 links, 6 on one side, and 3 on other side of clasp. Let me know your thoughts before I purchase. Thanks, Britton |
26 June 2023, 12:30 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 245
|
Many ADs should have an exhibition piece you can try on so you can see in person and determine how you feel about it.
Good luck! |
26 June 2023, 12:33 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Plankton
Location: US
Watch: less
Posts: 4,161
|
It would be best to try a display model first. My wrist is 7" and the huge Submariner clasp spans the entire underside of my wrist with little room for movement.
|
26 June 2023, 01:03 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Culpeper
Watch: 126613, DJ II
Posts: 40
|
Thanks for the info. I’ll make a trip to my local AD this week.
|
26 June 2023, 01:09 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
|
I have ~6.5" wrist and the Sub 41 fits very nicely. Looking for a photo to share. I think I have a few posts on this topic.
|
6 July 2023, 11:16 AM | #6 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
Submariner 41mm 6inch wrist
Quote:
I agree with your assessment. I love the 41 especially since it isn't truly 41mm. |
|
26 June 2023, 06:14 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 19
|
I have a 6.5 inch wrist and it works. No biggie!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 June 2023, 08:24 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
A 16610 Submariner would suit you fine.
|
26 June 2023, 08:56 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,035
|
I have a 124060 and a 7.25 inch wrist. For me, if the watch was any bigger, it would certainly be too big!
Only you can decide, but 'on paper' it sounds like it's going to be too big. |
26 June 2023, 09:03 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 614
|
What about a 114060? It works on my 6.75” wrist, the 124060 does not
|
26 June 2023, 10:05 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: USA
Watch: DJ41 126334 Silver
Posts: 156
|
I tried one on recently. 6.5” wrist. Felt large, but wearable.
|
26 June 2023, 11:34 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: ITALY
Watch: 16610LN - 126600
Posts: 335
|
On my wrist (6.5), the DJ looks bigger than the sub.
So I would be tempted to say: if the DJ fits well, also the Sub should fit well. |
27 June 2023, 01:48 AM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,268
|
What DJ do you have? Because I have a Submariner and a DJ41, and the Submariner wears bigger in every way. The Sub is bigger, thicker, and heavier. By comparison, the DJ41 feels light and dainty on my wrist, and it looks smaller too. I have 7.5" wrists, so either way, both fit great on me, but the Sub is definitely bigger in every way.
|
27 June 2023, 04:25 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 614
|
Quote:
|
|
27 June 2023, 08:46 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Culpeper
Watch: 126613, DJ II
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
I did try on my friends 1993 Submariner today and it fit perfectly and not too big. |
|
27 June 2023, 09:02 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,427
|
I think you will like the Sub better as the bezel reduces the size of the dial and the dial is what you see. The DJ with its narrow bezel just appears larger as the dial may be a tad wider.
|
27 June 2023, 10:07 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 614
|
|
27 June 2023, 11:33 AM | #18 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,268
|
Submariner 41mm 6inch wrist
Quote:
The bezel on a Submariner isn’t invisible. You can still see it. It really sticks out. It might not be a part of the dial, but it still counts in terms of the total size and look of the watch. I have both. Submariner is bigger, thicker and heavier. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
27 June 2023, 10:15 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,721
|
5 digit subs wear much smaller than ceramic ones. imo a ceramic sub on a 6 inch wrist looks ridiculous but at the end of the day it's up to you. there are just so many great watches out there for smaller wrists that i'd much rather wear personally
|
27 June 2023, 10:40 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,106
|
Quote:
Even a 5 digit is a large watch on a 6’’ wrist. OP, if you’re stuck on Rolex, get an Explorer 36mm. If you’re stuck on the diver aspect, get a Tudor 54. I have a 7”ish wrist and would not buy a sub if my wrist was much smaller. |
|
13 July 2023, 05:17 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Mont Boron
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
The 124060 is a much larger, heavier watch. It won't look as good on your wrist as your friend's Submariner does, and more importantly, it won't be as comfortable. Choosing the older reference is in no way a "compromise". Many people actually consider the 5-digit models to be the pinnacle of the Submariner-line.
__________________
"I give you the mausoleum of all hope and desire [...] not that you may remember time, but that you might forget it now and then..." |
|
27 June 2023, 11:44 PM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: ITALY
Watch: 16610LN - 126600
Posts: 335
|
Quote:
It was a DJ41, white dial, fluted bezel. Maybe it is the white dial compared to the black, maybe it is the fact that the dial of the Sub is smaller that of the DJ41, but on my wrist that DJ41 looked bigger than the Sub. |
|
28 June 2023, 02:01 AM | #23 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,268
|
Quote:
Post wrist shots. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 July 2023, 11:13 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Culpeper
Watch: 126613, DJ II
Posts: 40
|
Went to a AD dealer this week. I love the Bluesy! Is it a tad big, yes but I love it! I wore a Bentley Motors 44 many years ago, so this is a lot smaller.
|
26 June 2023, 11:37 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
If you don't actually need the Glidelock, are an Explorer 40 or AK clasp the same width? Could always try and obtain one of those and retrofit.
|
26 June 2023, 11:42 PM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
|
I think you’ll find the clasp wears large
|
26 June 2023, 11:43 PM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,700
|
My wrist is 6.5 the 41mm fits absolutely perfect. I do have a lot of wrist surface though both top and bottom ... Best to try in person.
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko | |
27 June 2023, 12:06 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,198
|
The clasp is huge. Here's on my 7in/18cm wrist, 60mm across (TT Sub41).
|
27 June 2023, 01:22 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,221
|
I too have a six inch wrist, and many large watches just look silly on me. However, the aforementioned svelte wrist is quite flat, so a large clasp is not usually an issue.
A lot depends on how you're built, round or flat.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
27 June 2023, 04:03 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
|
I have a 6.3" wrist, have worn many subs from the 16610 to the 126610.
IMHO, the 116610 was the sweet spot due to it being modern looking and felt like a tank. The 116610 had the boxy case, which actually wore well, but the 126610 has a slightly wider bracelet is what killed it for me. You need to try it on, as every wrist is different. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.