The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Saturday 14 December 2024 @ 7:04:17 pm

Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 February 2024, 07:42 AM   #1
rockysw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 760
Is rolex explorer 39 really understated?

Does any one has experience with rolex explorer 39 (214270) being understated (i.e. doesnt attract attention)?

I want an everyday watch that is simple and understated. Another option I am considering is IWC mark series (16, 18 or 20) in black dial (just to give a referene about kind of understatement I am looking for.

But explorer 39 also seems to fit the bill gievn its matte dial (vs glossy on the new 40mm). 36mm explorer are not an option for me as I like slightly bigger watches.

I also appriciate that this is very subjective. For example, I have heard some people say that sub is understated which I dont agree with (I find it quite flashy given its glossy dial, striking looks and ligth reflection from bezel teeths etc). But any views would be appriciated.
rockysw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 07:46 AM   #2
Dauntless
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 55
I previously had a 39 mm Explorer. I now have a submariner 126610LN. I have had many more people notice my Explorer. I wore it, thinking I would be inconspicuous, and for some reason several people who are not even watch people zeroed right in on the Explorer. Hey is that a Rolex?
Dauntless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 07:48 AM   #3
beachboy17
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Marc
Location: Lynbrook NY
Watch: Tdr Sub 7021 Snflk
Posts: 263
I actually own one ...the discontinued mark I dial..what appealed to me is that it doesn't scream Rolex. Its subtle and can be worn for dress and play. And the 39mm is the perfect case size for me.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
beachboy17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 09:21 PM   #4
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachboy17 View Post
I actually own one ...the discontinued mark I dial..what appealed to me is that it doesn't scream Rolex. Its subtle and can be worn for dress and play. And the 39mm is the perfect case size for me.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
That's not the Mk I dial.
zengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 07:49 AM   #5
Miker86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 280
A 214270 is less conspicuous than your average Rolex imo, no shiny ceramic bezel etc.

Also for me the best iteration of the Explorer, the positioning of the dial text and matte dial are superb.
Miker86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 07:55 AM   #6
nyc2la
"TRF" Member
 
nyc2la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miker86 View Post
A 214270 is less conspicuous than your average Rolex imo, no shiny ceramic bezel etc.

Also for me the best iteration of the Explorer, the positioning of the dial text and matte dial are superb.

Agreed all around.

__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE
nyc2la is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2024, 12:56 AM   #7
Robf52
"TRF" Member
 
Robf52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sunshine State
Watch: lots of Rolex
Posts: 5,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miker86 View Post
A 214270 is less conspicuous than your average Rolex imo, no shiny ceramic bezel etc.

Also for me the best iteration of the Explorer, the positioning of the dial text and matte dial are superb.
+1.
__________________
126610LV//116508 Daytona YG Black/Champagne
116655 YM40 Everose Oysterflex//126622 YM40 Blue//126600 SD43
126710BLNR//126711CHNR
126334 DJ41 Rhodium/Diamonds//126331 DJ41 TT Wimbledon
124300 OP41 Green//126334 DJ41Mint Green
Robf52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:00 AM   #8
TunaTuna
2024 Pledge Member
 
TunaTuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Merica
Posts: 1,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockysw View Post
Does any one has experience with rolex explorer 39 (214270) being understated (i.e. doesnt attract attention)?

I want an everyday watch that is simple and understated. Another option I am considering is IWC mark series (16, 18 or 20) in black dial (just to give a referene about kind of understatement I am looking for.

But explorer 39 also seems to fit the bill gievn its matte dial (vs glossy on the new 40mm). 36mm explorer are not an option for me as I like slightly bigger watches.

I also appriciate that this is very subjective. For example, I have heard some people say that sub is understated which I dont agree with (I find it quite flashy given its glossy dial, striking looks and ligth reflection from bezel teeths etc). But any views would be appriciated.
The explorer 39 is very understated, will attract zero attention. Zero. Buy and enjoy
TunaTuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:07 AM   #9
kkqd1337
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: LONDON
Posts: 232
If discretion is top of your priority list, any Rolex should be at the bottom.

I would suspect your average Joe wouldn't have even heard of IWC.

However - if you want a Rolex - the Explorer is a fantastic, as discrete as it gets, choice.
kkqd1337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:08 AM   #10
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,135
I think it’s about as low key as you can get in the Rolex professional line.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 12:32 PM   #11
pa1113
2024 Pledge Member
 
pa1113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North East
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
I think it’s about as low key as you can get in the Rolex professional line.

I have the 39, love it, and 100% agree with this. Someone would have to WANT to know (and care) what watch you are wearing and if that is the case they'll know the IWC too


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pa1113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:14 AM   #12
Wario406
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Colorado
Watch: 124060
Posts: 144

I love mine for many of the reasons you stated. I’ve yet to have someone walk up and say “nice Rolex”, but I regularly get “nice sub” comments when I wear my 124060.
Wario406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:22 AM   #13
East of Eden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 614
I think a Tudor Ranger would be much more understated than the Exp with its shiny bezel, not really a tool watch. The Ranger also has AR coating on the crystal which makes it less blingy
__________________
Watches: More than I need, not as many as I want.
East of Eden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 12:12 PM   #14
Wario406
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Colorado
Watch: 124060
Posts: 144
Is rolex explorer 39 really understated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by East of Eden View Post
I think a Tudor Ranger would be much more understated than the Exp with its shiny bezel, not really a tool watch. The Ranger also has AR coating on the crystal which makes it less blingy

The Ranger is awesome, but it’s NOT an Explorer. I owned a Ranger prior to the Mk2, and there’s no comparison in my mind as a “keeper”. :-)

MK2 is my EDC. Truly love it.

Wario406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 04:48 PM   #15
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by East of Eden View Post
I think a Tudor Ranger would be much more understated than the Exp with its shiny bezel, not really a tool watch. The Ranger also has AR coating on the crystal which makes it less blingy
The Tudor Heritage Ranger, which was discontinued a few years ago, is also a good underrated option. DLC black rehaut, 50m deeper depth rating than the Explorer, 99% brushed steel, and looks more similar to the original Explorers with its straight endlinks. Got mine in 2014 and its still running like new. (Sold my Explorer).
Attached Images
 
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 11:01 PM   #16
East of Eden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
The Tudor Heritage Ranger, which was discontinued a few years ago, is also a good underrated option. DLC black rehaut, 50m deeper depth rating than the Explorer, 99% brushed steel, and looks more similar to the original Explorers with its straight endlinks. Got mine in 2014 and its still running like new. (Sold my Explorer).
I was referring to the new Ranger, but yes on both. When I try on the current explorer I see a silly piece of jewelry with the polished bezel and very reflective crystal, the idea of using it on a serious outdoor activity as the originals were seems laughable. I get the same feeling when I see a PM sub
__________________
Watches: More than I need, not as many as I want.
East of Eden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 11:17 PM   #17
espanol
2024 Pledge Member
 
espanol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Mitchell
Location: EST, EAT
Watch: Trusty Explorer
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by East of Eden View Post
I was referring to the new Ranger, but yes on both. When I try on the current explorer I see a silly piece of jewelry with the polished bezel and very reflective crystal, the idea of using it on a serious outdoor activity as the originals were seems laughable. I get the same feeling when I see a PM sub
It’s a watch with legibility, waterproofness, and a darn tough case. It’s capable, yet I cannot see one instance of “serious outdoor activities” that would be required for a single complication watch like the Explorer. What would you have in mind?
espanol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2024, 12:00 AM   #18
East of Eden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by espanol View Post
It’s a watch with legibility, waterproofness, and a darn tough case. It’s capable, yet I cannot see one instance of “serious outdoor activities” that would be required for a single complication watch like the Explorer. What would you have in mind?
I wouldn’t call a scratch magnet polished bezel a darn tough case. I’m referring to the original expeditions these watches marketing efforts use, I don’t think those guys would choose today’s Explorer for those trips. Not that I’m going on one, but I have gone on week long fishing trips to the NW Territories of Canada, and hunting trips where shiny jewelry would be a hindrance, a Ranger would not be. I guess with today’s urban population where an outdoor adventure is a Sunday stroll in a park the Explorer is fine. That being said, I would agree the Explorer is more understated than most models.
__________________
Watches: More than I need, not as many as I want.
East of Eden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:27 AM   #19
TimeAZ
"TRF" Member
 
TimeAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,240
Absolutely the perfect watch. Flawless execution in terms of case, dimensions, movement, dial design/dial elements, bracelet, and on the wrist wearing experience. Also, very under-the-radar, but still somehow conveys high quality even from a distance.
__________________
The perfect blossom is a rare thing. You could spend your life looking for one, and it would not be a wasted life.
TimeAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:31 AM   #20
GrailTime
2024 Pledge Member
 
GrailTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Rich
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 482
Very low key.

Even London watch thieves may not notice one.
GrailTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:32 AM   #21
173rdabn
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: George
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 216570 Explorer II
Posts: 2,423
I had a 39 for several years. Stealthy, never asked about it and great legibility.
173rdabn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:51 AM   #22
JimSnyder
"TRF" Member
 
JimSnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Jim Snyder
Location: Ohio
Watch: Ask me later.....
Posts: 7,726
If I was a one watch guy..... it would be the Explorer, 36mm The 39mm is also a great choice.
__________________
"You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women."
JimSnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:46 AM   #23
BroncoOne
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,335
No nice watch is really understated except in comparison to other nice watches.

Explorer definitely is no bling and a more simple face that is easy to read. Great watch and I think that it will give you what you are looking for as not being a “statement” watch.
BroncoOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:56 AM   #24
davek35
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Ohio
Posts: 355
I always thought the 39mm Explorer had rather large 'Rolex' text on the dial, so I passed on them. Same with the 40mm.

I do have a 124270
davek35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 08:57 AM   #25
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,517
Look off brand. Anything with a ”ROLEX” on it the average person knows what it is. There is no getting around this. Rolex spent way too much to not have unmatched name recognition.
A IWC is unknown.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 09:05 AM   #26
Davidt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: U.K.
Posts: 99
Absolutely understated. I’ve never noticed anyone looking at my Explorer 214270 but frequently notice people ogling my Sub.
Davidt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 09:09 AM   #27
Javierruis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5
The 39mm Mark 2 is my favorite of all explorers. Super understated, classy, rugged and beautiful! You really can wear this watch anywhere as it's perfect for all occasions.
Javierruis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 09:14 AM   #28
Jerrocop
2024 Pledge Member
 
Jerrocop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: EXP 39, GRNR, SeaQ
Posts: 961
Owner here as well. Not only is it stealthy, I think it fits well and has a timeless design that’s tough to get tired of. IWC Mark __ are great watches too but in my opinion if your comparing the two and end up going with the IWC I think there’s a high percentage that you’ll come back and get the Explorer later down the line. It’s such a great watch that it’s tough to forget about it. If you go with the Explorer first IMO you’ll forget about the IWC.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jerrocop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 09:21 AM   #29
matthew P
"TRF" Member
 
matthew P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 470
Even more stealthy of the bracelet




..Explorer & Spring Diver - I’m just here for the photos..
matthew P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2024, 09:41 AM   #30
rockysw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 760
thank you all for the very helpful comments. :)
rockysw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.