The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 April 2024, 08:20 AM   #1
ajh77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 138
Is this 18238 Bracelet Stretch Minimal

Is this bracelet stretch minimal on these two different 18238 Day Dates ?
Attached Images
 
ajh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 08:27 AM   #2
piratfisk
"TRF" Member
 
piratfisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: Slam Diego
Watch: 16233, 116619LB
Posts: 2,315
The top one looks better to me. Either one looks like easy work for Mike @ RW.
__________________
What's the time? It's time to get ill.

Wishlist: 128236; 16202BC; 5396G
piratfisk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 08:35 AM   #3
ajh77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 138
But for a 34 yr old watch that isn’t planning on being serviced by Mike at RW and will
Just be worn, is this stretch very minimal ?
ajh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2024, 07:57 PM   #4
JSolution
"TRF" Member
 
JSolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajh77 View Post
But for a 34 yr old watch that isn’t planning on being serviced by Mike at RW and will
Just be worn, is this stretch very minimal ?
In short - yes
JSolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 08:40 AM   #5
piratfisk
"TRF" Member
 
piratfisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: Slam Diego
Watch: 16233, 116619LB
Posts: 2,315
It's fine I guess, what do you want me to tell you? That's too much stretch for my liking & I would send it to be refurb'd, but that's me. I'm also not in the market for a watch that's nearly as old as I am.
__________________
What's the time? It's time to get ill.

Wishlist: 128236; 16202BC; 5396G
piratfisk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 08:47 AM   #6
pk552502
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Real Name: Paul
Location: ohio
Watch: 16570 black
Posts: 513
The first one is minimal and would be fine by me. The second one is more than minimal but less than moderate. I think I'd be fine with either one as long as the watch itself was in sharp/unpolished condition.
pk552502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 08:49 AM   #7
Nello93
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 17
The one on bottom is a lot of stretch. Top one is pretty good. You need to wear it well fitted. Not too loose. Should be good.
Nello93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 08:52 AM   #8
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,178
Both are fine IMHO por a daily wear, the top would be my choice if everything else is equal among both watches


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 08:57 AM   #9
ajh77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 138
The bottom will be my daily wear watch and I don’t want to spend the extra $$ at RW.
What do you all think ? Look for one more tight ?
ajh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 09:06 AM   #10
huncho
2024 Pledge Member
 
huncho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,718
bezel on the top one looks too polished for my liking but stretch is pretty minimal. bottom one has a better bezel but a lot more stretch. keep in mind that the case is also being tilted to the left to lessen the effect of the stretch in the bottom one

what are the prices?
huncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 09:10 AM   #11
ajh77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 138
17,600.00 for bottom with Rolex 2 yr warranty .. was overhauled in 2024 and polished by Rolex.
ajh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 10:08 AM   #12
racerx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajh77 View Post
17,600.00 for bottom with Rolex 2 yr warranty .. was overhauled in 2024 and polished by Rolex.
Too stretched and over priced for my taste.
racerx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 09:11 AM   #13
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,642
With so many to choose from, I’d buy the best condition I could find (neither of those).
thesharkfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 09:12 AM   #14
ajh77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 138
Do you think that is a bad deal ?
I really like the dial.
ajh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 09:28 AM   #15
huncho
2024 Pledge Member
 
huncho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,718
i would pass, you should be able to get one with almost no stretch for 17-18

here's a reference for the price point

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=940533
huncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 09:44 AM   #16
ajh77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 138
Thank you for the advice, much appreciated.
ajh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 09:44 AM   #17
acorn
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: tree
Posts: 118
Top looks like he’s cheating a little, holding it down very slightly will show less flop.
acorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 10:15 AM   #18
ajh77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 138
Thank you for your opinion. I am going to pass on the purchase.
ajh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 10:51 AM   #19
yessir69
2024 Pledge Member
 
yessir69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,289
Bracelets that have stretch are more comfortable.

There. I said it.
yessir69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2024, 11:38 AM   #20
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
So many of those in almost unworn condition. Here is one with described "light stretch".
https://tropicalwatch.com/watches/o4ku
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2024, 12:16 AM   #21
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,756
Top is much better with the watch head pictured vertical.
Bottom one tilted backwards and will look worse if the head is also vertical.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2024, 11:48 AM   #22
StellarisCollection
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 76
Top one looks better.
StellarisCollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.