The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 April 2024, 12:32 PM   #1
cdmorenot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
cdmorenot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
Anyone own 5 digit and 6 digit Polar?

Hey gang,

Any insight from those that currently own or have owned both the 5 and 6 digit Explorer II is appreciated!

Which one do you wear most and why?

Context:

It has been a few months since I bought a 5 digit Exp II Polar and it has become my most worn watch. I love almost everything about it. My favorite things are the color of the dial and the bezel.

The only thing I still cannot get used to is the bracelet. It feels annoyingly too light compared to all of my other watches. While something can be said about the added comfort, I’ve grown to like and appreciate the heft of the solid, modern bracelets.

I can pull off 42mm no problem but I’m wondering if I’d be giving up too much “charm” for a more solid bracelet.

__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko |
cdmorenot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2024, 12:53 PM   #2
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,668
I don't own both but I do own the 5 digit polar and a 6 digit piece with a solid bracelet. Since we are talking bracelets specifically, I think my insight is somewhat helpful.

In short... You'd be giving up too much. I get what you say about the bracelets, though. There is a noticeable difference in them, but the wearability of the 5 digit case far outweighs the benefits. Your polar wears similar to my wrist. With the extra 4mm of lug to lug on the 6 digit, you'd be pushing, IMO.

I've tried on both the newer models and if I was a buyer, I'd get the modern in black. It seems to wear smaller.
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2024, 03:19 PM   #3
BillA
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,870
I just sold my 5 digit Polar. I found it to be very comfy. Not sure it is the bracelet you are referring to but the watch is much lighter than a 41 or 42mm watch. I just bought the Sub LV and when you put it next to it, found the Explorer to be puny. The weight difference you can easily feel when holding both watches.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_5861.jpeg (81.0 KB, 744 views)
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2024, 05:24 PM   #4
0nly5iv3Digits
"TRF" Member
 
0nly5iv3Digits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EARTH
Watch: What is "watch"?
Posts: 1,328
16570 Polar owner here - I began my collecting journey with 5 digit pieces so it is what I am used to.

I do own and have owned 6 digit pieces in the past. It's like anything else. Everything these days is a bit "too" perfect. You can thank modern advancements in technology... cnc machining etc. for that.

I understand where you're coming from bracelet-wise. I'd never (not in a million years) trade my 5 digit polar EXP II for a modern one though. I'd regret the hell out of it for sure!

Wear your other modern pieces - enjoy them. Hang onto your polar though. It is one to keep.

My $0.02
__________________
UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎
2FA Enabled
0nly5iv3Digits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 04:05 AM   #5
Polarexplorerii
"TRF" Member
 
Polarexplorerii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SA,TX
Watch: 16570,BLNR,116610
Posts: 2,241
I personally do not like the huge hands and orange gmt on the new one.
Polarexplorerii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 04:19 AM   #6
rmwill
2024 Pledge Member
 
rmwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 907
I did own both. I recently sold my 16570 and kept my 226570. I have big wrists and the 40mm wore small.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600
Rolex Explorer 224270
Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar
Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich
Panerai PAM00111

2 Factor Authentication
rmwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 10:02 AM   #7
rmagoo57
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmagoo57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmwill View Post
I did own both. I recently sold my 16570 and kept my 226570. I have big wrists and the 40mm wore small.
Show off! I owned both and kept the 16570! We should meet for a beer!!
rmagoo57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 05:24 AM   #8
dba
2024 Pledge Member
 
dba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Watch: 16710
Posts: 2,705
I have wrists that are 8 inches in circumference, so I can pull off the 42mm without issue. I've flipped for 3 different Polar 216570 models, but I always seem to come back to the five digit, 40mm sport models. I love that I can adjust the clasp a multitude of ways if needed and it's easy to do. I started with a five digit in 1984 so I guess I'm sort of fixed in my ways. Best of luck to you.
__________________
Current: 16710
Previous: 16760 Fat Lady, 16613 Bluesy, 16800, 14060, 16710 Pepsi, 216570 Polar, 116710LN, 16610, 216570 Polar (again), 16713, 216570 Polar (yet again), 16710 Black w/ Pepsi Insert
Hope is not a strategy.
dba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 05:27 AM   #9
soho
2024 Pledge Member
 
soho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,057
To me the 16570 is one of those pieces that just nails it. Perfect blend of cool, casual and class. I wouldn’t switch.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
soho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 05:41 AM   #10
Swearengen
"TRF" Member
 
Swearengen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,859
I perfer the 5 digit, as do these guys

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_UI...eProdigalGuide
__________________

1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013

Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016
16234
Swearengen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 11:43 AM   #11
cdmorenot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
cdmorenot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by soho View Post
To me the 16570 is one of those pieces that just nails it. Perfect blend of cool, casual and class. I wouldn’t switch.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yours looks flawless!
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko |
cdmorenot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 05:38 AM   #12
KatGirl
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,138
I’m with everyon3 else . Keep it! It’s a bette4 size, and I’d imagine very comfy, the way my 5 digit Sub date was. Lighter weight, and more compact case. Win Win, in my book.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 06:24 AM   #13
jimkar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: GR
Posts: 35
You can use the 97200 bracelet (6 digit sub) on you polar 5 digit and problem solved. I believe yours is with solid endlinks, right?

Στάλθηκε από το SM-S908B μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
jimkar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 11:42 AM   #14
cdmorenot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
cdmorenot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimkar View Post
You can use the 97200 bracelet (6 digit sub) on you polar 5 digit and problem solved. I believe yours is with solid endlinks, right?

Στάλθηκε από το SM-S908B μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
Interesting! I might just go down this rabbit hole.

I know the right move is to keep the 5 digit so let’s see where this takes me.
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko |
cdmorenot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 02:33 PM   #15
Armis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: .
Posts: 1,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdmorenot View Post
Interesting! I might just go down this rabbit hole.

I know the right move is to keep the 5 digit so let’s see where this takes me.
I have had the exact same dilemma as the OP. I find everything perfect about the 5 digit except for the bracelet (relative to modern options). I even bought and sold the 6 digit Polar twice. But if the above bracelet switch is a viable option, then I can make the move on a 5 digit. So, thanks for this suggestion.
Armis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2024, 09:54 AM   #16
Polarexplorerii
"TRF" Member
 
Polarexplorerii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SA,TX
Watch: 16570,BLNR,116610
Posts: 2,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimkar View Post
You can use the 97200 bracelet (6 digit sub) on you polar 5 digit and problem solved. I believe yours is with solid endlinks, right?

Στάλθηκε από το SM-S908B μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
Wait what, is this true? I have both and would love to switch bracelets..
Polarexplorerii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2024, 05:07 PM   #17
jimkar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: GR
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarexplorerii View Post
Wait what, is this true? I have both and would love to switch bracelets..
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=887208

Post 24. The members claims he has done it.
You can try it and confirm it.

Στάλθηκε από το SM-S908B μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
jimkar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2024, 09:17 PM   #18
PepsiBezel
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarexplorerii View Post
Wait what, is this true? I have both and would love to switch bracelets..
It works — I’ve done it. Just use the original springbars for the 16570.
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2024, 03:14 AM   #19
Polarexplorerii
"TRF" Member
 
Polarexplorerii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SA,TX
Watch: 16570,BLNR,116610
Posts: 2,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiBezel View Post
It works — I’ve done it. Just use the original springbars for the 16570.
Great, now I just have to buy the tools..
Polarexplorerii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 06:34 AM   #20
BETRNSX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Real Name: Jeff
Location: US
Posts: 66
What do the terms 5 digit and 6 digit mean? reference # speaking to size?
BETRNSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 07:46 AM   #21
TimeLord2
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
TimeLord2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by BETRNSX View Post
What do the terms 5 digit and 6 digit mean? reference # speaking to size?
Reference number is 6 digits on newer models and 5 on older versions. Size has changed on the new model. A few examples

The new 6-digit reference #226570 (42mm)
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=941796

The classic 5-digit reference #16570 (40mm)
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=944120

TimeLord2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 08:29 AM   #22
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,750
I own both, 16570 polar and 216570. I wear the 216570 more these days.
rushca01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 12:03 PM   #23
watchnwine
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 103
I don't own either but have been shopping for one for a while. To my eye, the handset on the 6-digit isn't the proper proportion in the white dial configuration (doesn't bother me in the black dial). The hands look too big an bulky on the 216570 polar to my eye. I've settled on tracking down a 5-digit.
watchnwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 12:03 PM   #24
cdm765
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Cameron
Location: Canada
Watch: All of them
Posts: 716
5 digit, but my wife has stolen it for her use. Y’all be careful out there!
cdm765 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2024, 11:43 PM   #25
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,676
The six digit for me.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2024, 09:46 PM   #26
quantumdna
"TRF" Member
 
quantumdna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Raja
Location: Cowboys Nation
Watch: VC 4000V
Posts: 399
Below are my tried and tested combinations…

1. 16570 + 97200 (previous generation Sub bracelet)
2. 16570 + 63600 (super jubilee with hidden clasp)

Both the bracelets work like a charm.
__________________
AP 15510ST (W) | ✠ 4000V | ♕ 126719BLRO | ♕ 126710BLRO | ♕ 116518LN | ♕ 116500LN (W) | ♕ 116610LV | IWC 328903
quantumdna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2024, 10:40 PM   #27
krounchou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumdna View Post
Below are my tried and tested combinations…

1. 16570 + 97200 (previous generation Sub bracelet)
2. 16570 + 63600 (super jubilee with hidden clasp)

Both the bracelets work like a charm.
Can you buy these bracelets at an AD with a 16570 in your possession ?
krounchou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2024, 11:13 PM   #28
quantumdna
"TRF" Member
 
quantumdna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Raja
Location: Cowboys Nation
Watch: VC 4000V
Posts: 399
Anyone own 5 digit and 6 digit Polar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by krounchou View Post
Can you buy these bracelets at an AD with a 16570 in your possession ?

Yes absolutely. My AD was able to order both the bracelets for me and did not ask why I needed them. I sold the 16570 long time back but still have retained the 2 bracelets. I now have my Black Ceramic Daytona (116500) on the super jubilee just to differentiate it from the white ceramic.

Both watches and shots are mine..


__________________
AP 15510ST (W) | ✠ 4000V | ♕ 126719BLRO | ♕ 126710BLRO | ♕ 116518LN | ♕ 116500LN (W) | ♕ 116610LV | IWC 328903
quantumdna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2024, 10:43 PM   #29
Sgooter
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Maui
Posts: 362
I have the 6-digit and it's great. If I had only the 5-digit, I would also be totally happy with it vs a 6-digit. For me, the pros/cons of the 5- vs 6-digit offset each other. Enjoy your 5-digit and never look back.
Sgooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2024, 12:51 AM   #30
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,641
I prefer the 5 digit, its a perfect sports watch. My only gripe is I feel the clasp is too short as I'm more used to the size of a 5 digit sub clasp.
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.