ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
17 April 2024, 12:32 PM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
|
Anyone own 5 digit and 6 digit Polar?
Hey gang,
Any insight from those that currently own or have owned both the 5 and 6 digit Explorer II is appreciated! Which one do you wear most and why? Context: It has been a few months since I bought a 5 digit Exp II Polar and it has become my most worn watch. I love almost everything about it. My favorite things are the color of the dial and the bezel. The only thing I still cannot get used to is the bracelet. It feels annoyingly too light compared to all of my other watches. While something can be said about the added comfort, I’ve grown to like and appreciate the heft of the solid, modern bracelets. I can pull off 42mm no problem but I’m wondering if I’d be giving up too much “charm” for a more solid bracelet.
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko | |
17 April 2024, 12:53 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,668
|
I don't own both but I do own the 5 digit polar and a 6 digit piece with a solid bracelet. Since we are talking bracelets specifically, I think my insight is somewhat helpful.
In short... You'd be giving up too much. I get what you say about the bracelets, though. There is a noticeable difference in them, but the wearability of the 5 digit case far outweighs the benefits. Your polar wears similar to my wrist. With the extra 4mm of lug to lug on the 6 digit, you'd be pushing, IMO. I've tried on both the newer models and if I was a buyer, I'd get the modern in black. It seems to wear smaller. |
17 April 2024, 03:19 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,870
|
I just sold my 5 digit Polar. I found it to be very comfy. Not sure it is the bracelet you are referring to but the watch is much lighter than a 41 or 42mm watch. I just bought the Sub LV and when you put it next to it, found the Explorer to be puny. The weight difference you can easily feel when holding both watches.
|
17 April 2024, 05:24 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EARTH
Watch: What is "watch"?
Posts: 1,328
|
16570 Polar owner here - I began my collecting journey with 5 digit pieces so it is what I am used to.
I do own and have owned 6 digit pieces in the past. It's like anything else. Everything these days is a bit "too" perfect. You can thank modern advancements in technology... cnc machining etc. for that. I understand where you're coming from bracelet-wise. I'd never (not in a million years) trade my 5 digit polar EXP II for a modern one though. I'd regret the hell out of it for sure! Wear your other modern pieces - enjoy them. Hang onto your polar though. It is one to keep. My $0.02
__________________
“UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎 2FA Enabled |
19 April 2024, 04:05 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SA,TX
Watch: 16570,BLNR,116610
Posts: 2,241
|
I personally do not like the huge hands and orange gmt on the new one.
|
19 April 2024, 04:19 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 907
|
I did own both. I recently sold my 16570 and kept my 226570. I have big wrists and the 40mm wore small.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 Rolex Explorer 224270 Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich Panerai PAM00111 2 Factor Authentication |
19 April 2024, 10:02 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,550
|
|
19 April 2024, 05:24 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Watch: 16710
Posts: 2,705
|
I have wrists that are 8 inches in circumference, so I can pull off the 42mm without issue. I've flipped for 3 different Polar 216570 models, but I always seem to come back to the five digit, 40mm sport models. I love that I can adjust the clasp a multitude of ways if needed and it's easy to do. I started with a five digit in 1984 so I guess I'm sort of fixed in my ways. Best of luck to you.
__________________
Current: 16710 Previous: 16760 Fat Lady, 16613 Bluesy, 16800, 14060, 16710 Pepsi, 216570 Polar, 116710LN, 16610, 216570 Polar (again), 16713, 216570 Polar (yet again), 16710 Black w/ Pepsi Insert Hope is not a strategy. |
19 April 2024, 05:27 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,057
|
To me the 16570 is one of those pieces that just nails it. Perfect blend of cool, casual and class. I wouldn’t switch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 April 2024, 05:41 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,859
|
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
19 April 2024, 11:43 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
|
Yours looks flawless!
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko | |
19 April 2024, 05:38 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,138
|
I’m with everyon3 else . Keep it! It’s a bette4 size, and I’d imagine very comfy, the way my 5 digit Sub date was. Lighter weight, and more compact case. Win Win, in my book.
Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
19 April 2024, 06:24 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: GR
Posts: 35
|
You can use the 97200 bracelet (6 digit sub) on you polar 5 digit and problem solved. I believe yours is with solid endlinks, right?
Στάλθηκε από το SM-S908B μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk |
19 April 2024, 11:42 AM | #14 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
|
Quote:
I know the right move is to keep the 5 digit so let’s see where this takes me.
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko | |
|
19 April 2024, 02:33 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: .
Posts: 1,581
|
I have had the exact same dilemma as the OP. I find everything perfect about the 5 digit except for the bracelet (relative to modern options). I even bought and sold the 6 digit Polar twice. But if the above bracelet switch is a viable option, then I can make the move on a 5 digit. So, thanks for this suggestion.
|
20 April 2024, 09:54 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SA,TX
Watch: 16570,BLNR,116610
Posts: 2,241
|
|
20 April 2024, 05:07 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: GR
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Post 24. The members claims he has done it. You can try it and confirm it. Στάλθηκε από το SM-S908B μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk |
|
20 April 2024, 09:17 PM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,212
|
|
22 April 2024, 03:14 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SA,TX
Watch: 16570,BLNR,116610
Posts: 2,241
|
|
19 April 2024, 06:34 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Real Name: Jeff
Location: US
Posts: 66
|
What do the terms 5 digit and 6 digit mean? reference # speaking to size?
|
19 April 2024, 07:46 AM | #21 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,187
|
Quote:
The new 6-digit reference #226570 (42mm) https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=941796 The classic 5-digit reference #16570 (40mm) https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=944120 |
|
19 April 2024, 08:29 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,750
|
I own both, 16570 polar and 216570. I wear the 216570 more these days.
|
19 April 2024, 12:03 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 103
|
I don't own either but have been shopping for one for a while. To my eye, the handset on the 6-digit isn't the proper proportion in the white dial configuration (doesn't bother me in the black dial). The hands look too big an bulky on the 216570 polar to my eye. I've settled on tracking down a 5-digit.
|
19 April 2024, 12:03 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Cameron
Location: Canada
Watch: All of them
Posts: 716
|
5 digit, but my wife has stolen it for her use. Y’all be careful out there!
|
19 April 2024, 11:43 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,676
|
The six digit for me.
|
20 April 2024, 09:46 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Raja
Location: Cowboys Nation
Watch: VC 4000V
Posts: 399
|
Below are my tried and tested combinations…
1. 16570 + 97200 (previous generation Sub bracelet) 2. 16570 + 63600 (super jubilee with hidden clasp) Both the bracelets work like a charm.
__________________
AP 15510ST (W) | ✠ 4000V | ♕ 126719BLRO | ♕ 126710BLRO | ♕ 116518LN | ♕ 116500LN (W) | ♕ 116610LV | IWC 328903 |
20 April 2024, 10:40 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 167
|
|
20 April 2024, 11:13 PM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Raja
Location: Cowboys Nation
Watch: VC 4000V
Posts: 399
|
Anyone own 5 digit and 6 digit Polar?
Quote:
Yes absolutely. My AD was able to order both the bracelets for me and did not ask why I needed them. I sold the 16570 long time back but still have retained the 2 bracelets. I now have my Black Ceramic Daytona (116500) on the super jubilee just to differentiate it from the white ceramic. Both watches and shots are mine..
__________________
AP 15510ST (W) | ✠ 4000V | ♕ 126719BLRO | ♕ 126710BLRO | ♕ 116518LN | ♕ 116500LN (W) | ♕ 116610LV | IWC 328903 |
|
20 April 2024, 10:43 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Maui
Posts: 362
|
I have the 6-digit and it's great. If I had only the 5-digit, I would also be totally happy with it vs a 6-digit. For me, the pros/cons of the 5- vs 6-digit offset each other. Enjoy your 5-digit and never look back.
|
21 April 2024, 12:51 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,641
|
I prefer the 5 digit, its a perfect sports watch. My only gripe is I feel the clasp is too short as I'm more used to the size of a 5 digit sub clasp.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.