You see these two across the room…

[Demonoid]

What’s your opinion?





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Akacoke]

At least that Hublot is not as big and bulky

[ikincooper]

I think the AP looks better, however it’s so much harder for me to see the actual time on it and surely that should be fundamental to any watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[speedfighter]

That Hublot is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better. That ball sack hanging off that creature's chin looks stupid. The case is nice though

[supernova]

The AP Kaws is aimed at Kaws fans and no one else I feel. He does have a large cult following and it’s more of a publicity/marketing move to garner more interest from the younger gen for the future. So it will be a very polarising piece.

I’m a fan of that piece and would definitely be impressed if I saw it across the room! No comment on the Hublot.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[huncho]

Originally Posted by supernova

The AP Kaws is aimed at Kaws fans and no one else I feel. He does have a large cult following and it’s more of a publicity/marketing move to garner more interest from the younger gen for the future. So it will be a very polarising piece.

I’m a fan of that piece and would definitely be impressed if I saw it across the room! No comment on the Hublot.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

yeah the kaws piece tells you a lot more about a person and their interests than the hublot

[Pw92676]

Not often would I choose a Hublot over an AP but in this scenario I would do so in a heartbeat.

[1William]

Not much.

[brandrea]

I think … what time is it

[samson66]

Originally Posted by brandrea

I think … what time is it

[gretch6364]

I would think the hublot wearer is tacky, too loud, but at least the person tried to buy a nice watch and likely loves it.

The Kaws is whimsical, fun and the best part, it pisses off watch nerds that think watch companies can only produce watches that they would personally purchase and that everyone in the world should share their opinion.

[VogelPhoenix]

Originally Posted by gretch6364

I would think the hublot wearer is tacky, too loud, but at least the person tried to buy a nice watch and likely loves it.

The Kaws is whimsical, fun and the best part, it pisses off watch nerds that think watch companies can only produce watches that they would personally purchase and that everyone in the world should share their opinion.

[crispyness87]

Originally Posted by gretch6364

I would think the hublot wearer is tacky, too loud, but at least the person tried to buy a nice watch and likely loves it.

The Kaws is whimsical, fun and the best part, it pisses off watch nerds that think watch companies can only produce watches that they would personally purchase and that everyone in the world should share their opinion.

This comment hits harder than Tyson’s punch.

[supernova]

Originally Posted by crispyness87

This comment hits harder than Tyson’s punch.

28 or 58 year old Tyson?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Napaswar]

Originally Posted by gretch6364

I would think the hublot wearer is tacky, too loud, but at least the person tried to buy a nice watch and likely loves it.

The Kaws is whimsical, fun and the best part, it pisses off watch nerds that think watch companies can only produce watches that they would personally purchase and that everyone in the world should share their opinion.

[singe89]

Originally Posted by gretch6364

I would think the hublot wearer is tacky, too loud, but at least the person tried to buy a nice watch and likely loves it.

The Kaws is whimsical, fun and the best part, it pisses off watch nerds that think watch companies can only produce watches that they would personally purchase and that everyone in the world should share their opinion.

This comment….yes

[speedfighter]

Originally Posted by gretch6364

I would think the hublot wearer is tacky, too loud, but at least the person tried to buy a nice watch and likely loves it.

The Kaws is whimsical, fun and the best part, it pisses off watch nerds that think watch companies can only produce watches that they would personally purchase and that everyone in the world should share their opinion.

Way to stereotype people you don't know in regard to Hublot collectors. Kind of like saying AP fans are stuck up, snotty, driveling, effete hobbyists who lick the various scrotums of AD personnel just to get a watch that they want. See how that works?

[gretch6364]

Originally Posted by speedfighter

Way to stereotype people you don't know in regard to Hublot collectors. Kind of like saying AP fans are stuck up, snotty, driveling, effete hobbyists who lick the various scrotums of AD personnel just to get a watch that they want. See how that works?

Found the Hublot owner!

[speedfighter]

and I found something else

[KatGirl]

I think those are two watches that I wouldn’t want, but each to his own.

Kat


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RRGHOST1]

Originally Posted by KatGirl

I think those are two watches that I wouldn’t want, but each to his own.

Kat


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I tend to agree with you on that !

[avilhena]

Hublot for me, no doubt

[~JJ]

At least they didn’t get pulled into a Cubitus! I’m not a fan of the concept case at all, but the movement, no hands and dial execution on the AP is awesome and well done.

[matthew P]

I dont see either of them as a viable daily
but the AP makes for a significantly better conversation piece IMO.


..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO..

[gretch6364]

Originally Posted by matthew P

I dont see either of them as a viable daily
but the AP makes for a significantly better conversation piece IMO.


..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO..

And this matters because? I would venture to say almost no one is purchasing a $200K AP Concept to be their daily watch. In fact, it being time only helps with not wearing it everyday.

[subtona]

Originally Posted by gretch6364

And this matters because? I would venture to say almost no one is purchasing a $200K AP Concept to be their daily watch. In fact, it being time only helps with not wearing it everyday.

One man’s perspective.

[Pfang56]

Originally Posted by gretch6364

And this matters because? I would venture to say almost no one is purchasing a $200K AP Concept to be their daily watch. In fact, it being time only helps with not wearing it everyday.

Why not?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[subtona]

Is there a Rolex in the house

[gretch6364]

Ok….tou can wear it as a daily but it is likely not your only watch.

[Rebel]

Not my cup of tea.