ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Joey_V · 28 October 2009, 08:25 PM

What a nice submariner. If I had the extra cash, I would pick one up.

It's heavy, well built, good looking. A one of a kind Submariner - I haven't seen one on anyone else's wrists.

HEAVY.... feels solid.

Have you guys seen on at your ADs? Is this a rather rare piece?

Psmith · 28 October 2009, 09:54 PM

All of the Melbourne ADs (3) have them... or at least did a few months ago. I tried it myself, along with a full YG GMT IIc. Both impressively hefty, but I'm a stainless steel sort of chap...

Cheers

tifosi · 28 October 2009, 10:23 PM

My AD had one and I had it on. I had to take it off quickly for risk of depleteing my savings account right on the spot. Very impressive watch.

forza1976 · 28 October 2009, 10:27 PM

Yeah what an awesome watch. I love that blue dial and bezel, I have to agree that it felt great on the wrist!

Lol-x · 28 October 2009, 10:33 PM

So how do you guys like that blue dial?

1000ftSub · 10 November 2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lol-x

So how do you guys like that blue dial?

Everybodys gotta love that blue

Singslinger · 10 November 2009, 01:10 PM

I've seen it in most ADs in Singapore so it isn't rare by any means.

That said, I haven't seen it on anyone's wrist - yet!

deserted · 28 October 2009, 10:40 PM

The smurf blue in person is very nice looking , posting pictures on line does it no justice , it's a must see watch , my AD here in illinois has three of them 2 creamic black and gold and the smurf blue..

PeterT · 28 October 2009, 10:43 PM

If the watch is on its own, the blue dial and bezel are OK. On the other hand if it is side by side with a blue 16613, I feel the colour is lacking on the new model. It lack the richness of the older model and the dial does not shimmer as you turn it in the light.

On the other hand, if someone was giving one away I would not say no thanks!!

PeterT

snowbird · 29 October 2009, 12:44 AM

I agree that the new blue sub color looks different (and better) in person than in pictures, it just seems to be a color where pictures and real life are two different things.

alohanakoni · 29 October 2009, 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbird

I agree that the new blue sub color looks different (and better) in person than in pictures, it just seems to be a color where pictures and real life are two different things.

i agree. you notice it right away and know it's WG.

kcmo · 29 October 2009, 12:47 AM

My husband loves the WG blue Sub! I've never really been a blue dial kinda gal but it is quite an impressive piece!

sandytn · 29 October 2009, 12:52 AM

My local AD had one. I tried it on. Feels like a very substantial watch and looks great, but pricey. Wish I had the extra cash. Would upgrade from my TT 16613 to WG blue sub in a minute.

dalip · 29 October 2009, 12:56 AM

it is one hell of a gorgeous watch.... but not top of my list for that cash..

ersnyder · 29 October 2009, 12:58 AM

I tried one on before knowing that a WG Sub had come out but noticed that it appeared different from other Subs in the window. I personally love the new blue but it is certainly different from prior blues used by Rolex. I guess the ceramic is the reason. Felt great though!

Joey_V · 29 October 2009, 04:36 AM

Like everyone said, I would take it in a heartbeat!!

BUT and it's a BIG but.... the price at $29,000 is bit much for me.

Too rich fo' my blood!

Jason71 · 29 October 2009, 07:02 AM

I have been offered one for $23,800.........but that is still A HECKOVALOTTA money. I do love that watch though

scl6118 · 10 November 2009, 12:47 PM

I love that watch, but will wait for SS!

bodybump · 10 November 2009, 01:14 PM

Itsss a ohhhhlllaaaallaaaaa watch!!!

Max · 10 November 2009, 01:31 PM

Definitely a nice watch, but for that price I'd go with an Audemars.

deserted · 10 November 2009, 02:47 PM

My Ad just recieved one, got a call saturday!

Juggernaut · 10 November 2009, 02:50 PM

what serial letter was it?

33JS · 10 November 2009, 08:29 PM

The blue is just 'wrong', it should have been the older, deeper blue that exuded true class rather than just bright 'bling'.

I worry about some of the models being designed for wannabee rappers, there's just something going wrong with some designs. Rolex have some classic, classic designs and some of the upgrades are wonderful, but the Leopard, YM II and the blue of this sub are just gonna look terrible in years to come - hell, they look terrible now.

Perhaps I'm stuck in a time-warp and just don't understand the new designs.

BlkDTN · 10 November 2009, 05:43 PM

Not worth the money. I'd like to pick a DDII instead

28 October 2009, 08:25 PM	#1
Joey_V "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joey Location: Dallas, TX Watch: SS Sub 16610 M Posts: 3,824	Tried on the WG Blue Sub... What a nice submariner. If I had the extra cash, I would pick one up. It's heavy, well built, good looking. A one of a kind Submariner - I haven't seen one on anyone else's wrists. HEAVY.... feels solid. Have you guys seen on at your ADs? Is this a rather rare piece? __________________ Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD

28 October 2009, 09:54 PM	#2
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	All of the Melbourne ADs (3) have them... or at least did a few months ago. I tried it myself, along with a full YG GMT IIc. Both impressively hefty, but I'm a stainless steel sort of chap... Cheers __________________

28 October 2009, 10:23 PM	#3
tifosi "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Russ Location: Southern NJ Posts: 5,760	My AD had one and I had it on. I had to take it off quickly for risk of depleteing my savings account right on the spot. Very impressive watch. __________________ Russ

28 October 2009, 10:27 PM	#4
forza1976 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: matt Location: Denver Posts: 608	Yeah what an awesome watch. I love that blue dial and bezel, I have to agree that it felt great on the wrist! __________________ Current Collection Rolex SS Daytona WD IWC Big Pilot PAM Black Seal 183 Omega SS Triple Date TW Steel CEO

28 October 2009, 10:33 PM	#5
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,590	So how do you guys like that blue dial? __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

10 November 2009, 01:10 PM	#7
Singslinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 6,424	I've seen it in most ADs in Singapore so it isn't rare by any means. That said, I haven't seen it on anyone's wrist - yet!

28 October 2009, 10:40 PM	#8
deserted Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: fort wayne IN Watch: Patek 1909003 Posts: 2,176	The smurf blue in person is very nice looking , posting pictures on line does it no justice , it's a must see watch , my AD here in illinois has three of them 2 creamic black and gold and the smurf blue..

28 October 2009, 10:43 PM	#9
PeterT "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: England Watch: 16613 16710 16600 Posts: 1,021	If the watch is on its own, the blue dial and bezel are OK. On the other hand if it is side by side with a blue 16613, I feel the colour is lacking on the new model. It lack the richness of the older model and the dial does not shimmer as you turn it in the light. On the other hand, if someone was giving one away I would not say no thanks!! PeterT

29 October 2009, 12:44 AM	#10
snowbird "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: USA Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 2,157	I agree that the new blue sub color looks different (and better) in person than in pictures, it just seems to be a color where pictures and real life are two different things.

29 October 2009, 12:47 AM	#12
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	My husband loves the WG blue Sub! I've never really been a blue dial kinda gal but it is quite an impressive piece!

29 October 2009, 12:52 AM	#13
sandytn Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Sandy Location: NJ Posts: 713	My local AD had one. I tried it on. Feels like a very substantial watch and looks great, but pricey. Wish I had the extra cash. Would upgrade from my TT 16613 to WG blue sub in a minute.

29 October 2009, 12:56 AM	#14
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	it is one hell of a gorgeous watch.... but not top of my list for that cash.. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

29 October 2009, 12:58 AM	#15
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	I tried one on before knowing that a WG Sub had come out but noticed that it appeared different from other Subs in the window. I personally love the new blue but it is certainly different from prior blues used by Rolex. I guess the ceramic is the reason. Felt great though!

29 October 2009, 04:36 AM	#16
Joey_V "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joey Location: Dallas, TX Watch: SS Sub 16610 M Posts: 3,824	Like everyone said, I would take it in a heartbeat!! BUT and it's a BIG but.... the price at $29,000 is bit much for me. Too rich fo' my blood! __________________ Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD

29 October 2009, 07:02 AM	#17
Jason71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jason Location: USA Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers Posts: 7,973	I have been offered one for $23,800.........but that is still A HECKOVALOTTA money. I do love that watch though __________________ Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY

10 November 2009, 12:47 PM	#18
scl6118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Shawn Location: United States Watch: SS GMT IIC Posts: 1,624	I love that watch, but will wait for SS!

10 November 2009, 01:14 PM	#19
bodybump ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Oscar Location: Florida Watch: Me!!! Posts: 23,233	Itsss a ohhhhlllaaaallaaaaa watch!!! __________________

10 November 2009, 01:31 PM	#20
Max Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Chicago Posts: 161	Definitely a nice watch, but for that price I'd go with an Audemars.

10 November 2009, 02:47 PM	#21
deserted Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: fort wayne IN Watch: Patek 1909003 Posts: 2,176	My Ad just recieved one, got a call saturday!

10 November 2009, 02:50 PM	#22
Juggernaut "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 901	what serial letter was it?

10 November 2009, 08:29 PM	#23
33JS "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: John Location: Scotland Watch: SD 50th Ann Posts: 444	The blue is just 'wrong', it should have been the older, deeper blue that exuded true class rather than just bright 'bling'. I worry about some of the models being designed for wannabee rappers, there's just something going wrong with some designs. Rolex have some classic, classic designs and some of the upgrades are wonderful, but the Leopard, YM II and the blue of this sub are just gonna look terrible in years to come - hell, they look terrible now. Perhaps I'm stuck in a time-warp and just don't understand the new designs.

10 November 2009, 05:43 PM	#24
BlkDTN "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NY Posts: 4	Not worth the money. I'd like to pick a DDII instead

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)