ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 January 2020, 10:23 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Cleveland
Watch: GMT 16750
Posts: 212
|
Changing 16710 to a 1675/16750
I was curious on general thoughts on trading in my full set 16710 for a good example but naked, matte dial 1675/16750.
I personally like the 1675/16750 over the 16710. The only thing that gives me pause is I'll be losing the full set. Not that the "investment" portion of a full set is super critical to me, I wear my watches, but it was nice to have if that makes sense. If it were you would you keep the nice full set 16710 or roll with a good example 1675/16750??? Sorry, no pictures yet. I haven't found the 1675/16750 example. Taking my time to find the right piece. I understand this all really comes down to personal preference and various variables between the two watches but would still appreciate general thoughts and insight. |
11 January 2020, 10:43 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wayne
Watch: Rolex 5512
Posts: 142
|
To me you said the important thing....you wear your watches....if you are buying this watch to wear, not as an investment, I wouldn’t worry about the box and papers....you can always source a box if you want and while the papers are cool, I’d go with your emotions and get then1675/16750.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 January 2020, 11:40 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 158
|
While I didn’t have a full set 16710, I did in fact sell mine to fund a birth year 1675. The small markers on a 16710 (albeit with white gold surrounds) just don’t have the warmth of the maxi markers on a nicely patinated 1675.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12 January 2020, 01:52 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
|
I had a 16700 that I barely didn't wear, I sold it and then bought a 1675 (+ money on top of course). This one I wear as a daily...both pepsi !
|
12 January 2020, 03:32 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,367
|
Keep the full set and save up your pennies for a 1675.
|
12 January 2020, 05:24 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
|
@greatgoo
Without seeing your current kit, and pics of the specific GMTs you’re thinking of acquiring, it’s difficult to give any meaningful advice. But, taken as a thought experiment I would make the trade. ———— IG: @onthedial Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 January 2020, 08:39 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Yes....would think a bit more about losing the 16710. Am fortunate to have this and the 1675/16750. Whilst both of these are really great watches, I am inclined to be even more cautious when wearing them. My 16710 on the other hand goes just about anywhere.
|
14 January 2020, 09:11 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,574
|
I would keep your full set 16710, more usable for daily wear & tear. But that me.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.