The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 24 September 2020, 12:54 AM   #1
Guybrush
"TRF" Member
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Maryland
Watch: 118209
Posts: 697
Why the Submariner should cost $980

This is very scientific--try to keep up. I've just been offered a Sea Dweller by my AD at (of course) msrp, which is $12,600. The watch is rated to 12,800 feet. That shakes out to roughly $0.98 per foot of water resistance. Thusly, apply the same logic to the Submariner, and you arrive at $980. I plan to suggest this pricing scheme to Rolex. Will keep you posted.

In all seriousness, as excited as I am to be offered any ss sports model (a first for me!), I think I'm going to decline this one and hold out for the 43mm or a Sub (any config) whichever comes first. This is too much watch for me---both physically and monetarily, not that the 43 is much less. Hopefully that also signals to the AD that I'm not just looking to flip something.

Some other lucky buyer can harpoon this sea creature. I don't think they'll have any trouble moving it.
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 02:17 AM   #2
stratguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Speedmaster Pro
Posts: 670
In my experience, there is not much physical difference between the Deepsea and the 43mm Sea Dweller. Of the two, I would go with the Deepsea. Much cooler watch.
stratguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 02:20 AM   #3
Rori
"TRF" Member
 
Rori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,592
Funny mathematics here :-)
Talking about mathematics, The SD43 is way more than the sum of its parts.
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.
Rori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 02:39 AM   #4
Zuman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: The Bush
Posts: 44
You could get a Panerai Luminor: 30m water resistance x 98 cents/foot = $96.
I might even get one at that price.
Nah...
Zuman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 02:44 AM   #5
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
Just found an invita for 95$ that you believe should be worth $980. Talk about value.
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 03:43 AM   #6
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuman View Post
You could get a Panerai Luminor: 30m water resistance x 98 cents/foot = $96.
I might even get one at that price.
Nah...
Ahh hahar!
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 03:52 AM   #7
WhiteRhino
"TRF" Member
 
WhiteRhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: SD43
Posts: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by stratguy View Post
In my experience, there is not much physical difference between the Deepsea and the 43mm Sea Dweller. Of the two, I would go with the Deepsea. Much cooler watch.
I disagree. The DSSD is leaps and bounds different as it relates to wearability. The DSSD is an absolute tuna can. Not many can pull it off. The SD43 is much more wearable. Think of it as a slightly beefed up Sub. The DSSD is the better watch IMHO, the thickness is massive though and is a non-starter
WhiteRhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 11:02 AM   #8
mrarchiegoodwin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: California/Malaga
Watch: GShock Frogman
Posts: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brny11 View Post
Just found an invita for 95$ that you believe should be worth $980. Talk about value.
mrarchiegoodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 11:15 AM   #9
donas
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Wade
Location: TN
Watch: 116619
Posts: 2,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteRhino View Post
I disagree. The DSSD is leaps and bounds different as it relates to wearability. The DSSD is an absolute tuna can. Not many can pull it off. The SD43 is much more wearable. Think of it as a slightly beefed up Sub. The DSSD is the better watch IMHO, the thickness is massive though and is a non-starter
It wears different on everyone, but this was my experience as well. I hated my DSSD as soon as I bought it My SD43 wears just a hair bigger than a sub. I notice more weight difference than size difference in 43 vs sub.

Can't find a $10,000 sub in a store, imagine a $980 sub LOL. On the flip side, maybe the ADs would once again be full because it wouldn't have the "investment" following at a reasonable price.
donas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 11:20 AM   #10
wiem0014
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: 126710BLRO
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteRhino View Post
I disagree. The DSSD is leaps and bounds different as it relates to wearability. The DSSD is an absolute tuna can. Not many can pull it off. The SD43 is much more wearable. Think of it as a slightly beefed up Sub. The DSSD is the better watch IMHO, the thickness is massive though and is a non-starter
I was going to say exactly the same thing. After trying both I found the DSSD to be almost unwearable due to how thick and top heavy it is. The SD43 on the other hand (although large for a Rolex) is much more comfortable and sits better on my wrist. This has been the case for others that I know who have tried both as well.

Watches are definitely reliant on personal taste, but relatively speaking the DSSD wears much differently than the SD43.
__________________
Find me on Instagram: MN_Watch_Fanatic

Patek: 5168G (Blue)
Rolex: 126710BLRO, 116515LN, 124060
wiem0014 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:40 PM   #11
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,907
I had the Sd43. Aesthetically its a beautiful watch but I found it top heavy and cumbersome on the wrist. I can’t imagine what the deepsea wears like, but I guess it wouldn’t be for me. I have a 7 3/4 wrist too.
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2020, 02:51 AM   #12
Ketler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 467
I had and wore a Deep Sea for 18 moths exclusively...
Ended up selling it and buying a 126600...
Could not be happier...
Ketler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.