The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 August 2021, 06:44 AM   #1
scousejames
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 98
Anyone with a glidelock clasp on a 16710?

Anyone fitted a glidelock clasp or the 97200 bracelet to their 16710?

How does it wear?

I'm having issues with the comfortability of the 16710 in the UK summer with my wrist constantly swelling.

Managed to find a glidelock clasp for sale, but not sure if it'd throw the watch off balance on the 16710?
scousejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 07:56 AM   #2
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Our member here Mike 'Boaters" has one. When he reads this thread maybe he will chime in.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=499986
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 08:35 AM   #3
e dantes
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: US
Posts: 473
Anyone with a glidelock clasp on a 16710?

I have the 97200 on a 16570. I wear it during the hotter months of the year.

The clasp is definitely bigger and heavier than the standard 78790A oyster bracelet clasp. When I switch, the glidelock is very noticeable for the first few days. Then I get used to it again. When it is warm I use the micro adjustments every day so it is worth it to me. When exercising, hiking, etc. it is great.

To me the Explorer II on the 78790A oyster bracelet feels natural. The glidelock is more visible and I can feel it, but it is a small downgrade to get the micro adjustments. I have a 6 3/4” wrist. It might blend in a little better if you have larger wrist.

If your wrist swells and shrink throughout the day, I highly recommend it.

Plus it gives the Red Cross somewhere to tape the tubing without pulling out any of my arm hair.








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
e dantes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 09:14 AM   #4
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
It fits, but the weight distribution will feel just a little weird until you get used it it where it actually feels a bit bottom heavy.
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 11:03 AM   #5
sunnygps
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,145
I have the glidelock 97200 bracelet on my 5 digit explorer II and GMT 16710. I prefer the 5 digits on heavier bracelet as the bracelet balances the lighter watch better on my wrist. I get best of the both worlds.
sunnygps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 11:33 AM   #6
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
It is so nice compared to the oyster clasp.
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 11:44 AM   #7
Bladeshot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Bladeshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,850
I’ve done it very successfully but I don’t seem to have any pics. For a long time, I felt a 97200 bracelet was perfect on the 16710.

But the 97200 is quite heavy and at this point, I do prefer a 93150. All my GMTs ride on a 93150 with one permanent link removed at 6:00. That centers the clasp and fits perfectly. I like that setup so much, I have (2) 93150 bracelets set up that way.

Now, for your situation. I saw you say you may purchase the clasp only… that may be a perfect solution. You won’t have the full, solid links, so you’ll have less total weight in the bracelet. Give it a go. I bet you’ll like it. I do love the glidelock.
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade...
Bladeshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 11:47 AM   #8
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTX I View Post
Our member here Mike 'Boaters" has one. When he reads this thread maybe he will chime in.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=499986
Thanks Flavio it is so much better than the oyster clasp. Glidelock all the way
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 08:29 PM   #9
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boaters View Post
Thanks Flavio it is so much better than the oyster clasp. Glidelock all the way
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2021, 08:39 PM   #10
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTX I View Post
Our member here Mike 'Boaters" has one. When he reads this thread maybe he will chime in.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=499986
Memory like an elephant
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2021, 12:23 AM   #11
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
As much as I love the glidelock design and system, I've grown to find it to be simply too big. I wish the clasp was just shorter with half the adjustability.

That said, I've worn it with my 16710 several times and I feel like the weight balance is off a little. Ironically I do use it to dial in the perfect fit, but I just think it's too heavy for that watch.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2021, 03:18 AM   #12
watchtabs
"TRF" Member
 
watchtabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Charlie
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by e dantes View Post
I have the 97200 on a 16570. I wear it during the hotter months of the year.

The clasp is definitely bigger and heavier than the standard 78790A oyster bracelet clasp. When I switch, the glidelock is very noticeable for the first few days. Then I get used to it again. When it is warm I use the micro adjustments every day so it is worth it to me. When exercising, hiking, etc. it is great.

To me the Explorer II on the 78790A oyster bracelet feels natural. The glidelock is more visible and I can feel it, but it is a small downgrade to get the micro adjustments. I have a 6 3/4” wrist. It might blend in a little better if you have larger wrist.

If your wrist swells and shrink throughout the day, I highly recommend it.

Plus it gives the Red Cross somewhere to tape the tubing without pulling out any of my arm hair.








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa..

Whoa..

Hold it right there!

Whoa.

I NEED THIS. HELP.

I need to upgrade my 5 digits to this. Please illuminate us with your knowledge of how to get this done. Simply search for a '97200 clasp' on ebay? Or is 97200 the whole bracelet?

__________________
I have all the grails I could ever want, but the hunt will always continue .


watchtabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2021, 04:50 AM   #13
chris242
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
chris242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The Bahamas
Watch: 116610lv
Posts: 1,078
i’d love to find a glidelock for my 216570. what’s the best way to source one?
chris242 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.