ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 February 2023, 08:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 18
|
Help dating this submariner?
Hi folks, would anyone know a way to date this sub exactly?
I believe its 2003-2005 due to serial starting F.. Does the engraved rehaut mean its later than 03? Im leaning towards 04.. |
13 February 2023, 08:26 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,367
|
Help dating this submariner?
I think they started engraving rehauts in 2005, but for subs I thought that started with the M serials which wouldve been 2007-2008.
If yours is an F maybe the subs got engraving earlier than I thought. Edit: Yours is a ceramic which would date it past 2010 I believe. |
13 February 2023, 08:36 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Aus
Posts: 435
|
That’s a 116610, so 2010+
|
13 February 2023, 08:36 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 18
|
You could be right.. I think i have mistook a scrambled serial with it happening to have F at the beginning..
Looks like the 116610 was made 2010 onwards like you say. I was looking at 16610.. I will keep digging.. I was told it was around 7-8 years old, but i thought 20 lol |
13 February 2023, 08:39 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub| DJ41| 79540
Posts: 1,415
|
2010+. Do you have the card? If so we see if it is a new card.
|
13 February 2023, 08:43 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 18
|
No card unfortunately :(
|
13 February 2023, 09:31 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 901
|
Where did you get the watch from? The engraving looks slightly off to me- but could just be the photo
|
13 February 2023, 10:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 484
|
Post 2010 up until the 126610 launched.
|
13 February 2023, 10:06 AM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Chocolates and champagne.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
13 February 2023, 07:01 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 18
|
Is the 93150 the correct bracelet for this watch ?
|
14 February 2023, 12:17 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
Can you post a straight on picture of the bezel?
|
14 February 2023, 01:23 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,859
|
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
14 February 2023, 02:53 AM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
No it is not. There are also other flags on the authenticity of this watch. Proceed with caution here.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
14 February 2023, 03:30 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 713
|
|
14 February 2023, 03:31 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: NV
Posts: 271
|
That engraving looks suspect, not the right font.
__________________
2FA Enabled |
14 February 2023, 03:31 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 713
|
Lume dots look sketchy too.
|
14 February 2023, 04:41 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
|
There are plenty of counterfeit Rolex watches which all have the same serial number, for instance F432118 is common. Just do a search for your serial to check if it is one of those.
|
14 February 2023, 05:00 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 36
|
Looks pretty fake to mee. Look at the 6 o clock marker. Way too sharp edges. Or the "hole" in the second hand. My suggestion is to stay away!
Edit: it doesn't look fake. It IS fake. No doubt. Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G781B met Tapatalk |
14 February 2023, 12:05 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
|
It is 100% not genuine
|
14 February 2023, 12:06 PM | #20 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,346
|
Quote:
Steer clear. Unless you already bought. In which case, I’d steer clear. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
14 February 2023, 04:04 PM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
That is a 100% genuine fake rolex.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.